双重过程理论:语境中的计算认知

A. Robins
{"title":"双重过程理论:语境中的计算认知","authors":"A. Robins","doi":"10.1145/3487055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores a major theoretical framework from psychology, Dual Process Theory (DPT), which has received surprisingly little attention in the computing education literature. DPT postulates the existence of two qualitatively different kinds of cognitive systems, a fast, intuitive “System 1” and a slow, reflective “System 2”. System 1 is associated with cognitive factors such as crystallized intelligence, long-term memory and associative learning; System 2 with fluid intelligence, working memory, and rule learning. This paper summarizes DPT and the way it has been expressed and explored in literatures relating to intelligence, memory, learning, attention, cognitive load, and more. It proposes a summary model, the Dual Process Cycle (DPC). It then considers example concepts from computing education within the context of this model. Examples include programming expertise, mental models of programs, the notional machine, code reading and code writing, and the theory of Learning Edge Momentum (LEM). In conclusion, it is argued that the DPC (and the framework of DPTs in general) provides a useful context for defining such concepts more richly and exactly, and for generating interesting questions about them.","PeriodicalId":352564,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual Process Theories: Computing Cognition in Context\",\"authors\":\"A. Robins\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3487055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores a major theoretical framework from psychology, Dual Process Theory (DPT), which has received surprisingly little attention in the computing education literature. DPT postulates the existence of two qualitatively different kinds of cognitive systems, a fast, intuitive “System 1” and a slow, reflective “System 2”. System 1 is associated with cognitive factors such as crystallized intelligence, long-term memory and associative learning; System 2 with fluid intelligence, working memory, and rule learning. This paper summarizes DPT and the way it has been expressed and explored in literatures relating to intelligence, memory, learning, attention, cognitive load, and more. It proposes a summary model, the Dual Process Cycle (DPC). It then considers example concepts from computing education within the context of this model. Examples include programming expertise, mental models of programs, the notional machine, code reading and code writing, and the theory of Learning Edge Momentum (LEM). In conclusion, it is argued that the DPC (and the framework of DPTs in general) provides a useful context for defining such concepts more richly and exactly, and for generating interesting questions about them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3487055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3487055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文探讨了一个主要的心理学理论框架,双过程理论(DPT),它在计算教育文献中很少受到关注。DPT假设存在两种性质不同的认知系统,快速、直观的“系统1”和缓慢、反思的“系统2”。系统1与认知因素有关,如结晶智力、长期记忆和联想学习;第二系统,具有流动智力、工作记忆和规则学习能力。本文综述了DPT及其在智力、记忆、学习、注意力、认知负荷等方面的表达方式和探索。提出了一个总结模型——双过程周期(Dual Process Cycle, DPC)。然后在该模型的上下文中考虑计算教育中的示例概念。例子包括编程专业知识、程序的心智模型、概念机器、代码阅读和代码编写,以及学习边缘动量(LEM)理论。总之,本文认为,DPC(以及一般的dpt框架)提供了一个有用的上下文,可以更丰富、更准确地定义这些概念,并产生关于它们的有趣问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual Process Theories: Computing Cognition in Context
This paper explores a major theoretical framework from psychology, Dual Process Theory (DPT), which has received surprisingly little attention in the computing education literature. DPT postulates the existence of two qualitatively different kinds of cognitive systems, a fast, intuitive “System 1” and a slow, reflective “System 2”. System 1 is associated with cognitive factors such as crystallized intelligence, long-term memory and associative learning; System 2 with fluid intelligence, working memory, and rule learning. This paper summarizes DPT and the way it has been expressed and explored in literatures relating to intelligence, memory, learning, attention, cognitive load, and more. It proposes a summary model, the Dual Process Cycle (DPC). It then considers example concepts from computing education within the context of this model. Examples include programming expertise, mental models of programs, the notional machine, code reading and code writing, and the theory of Learning Edge Momentum (LEM). In conclusion, it is argued that the DPC (and the framework of DPTs in general) provides a useful context for defining such concepts more richly and exactly, and for generating interesting questions about them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信