利用气泡种群平衡模型预测CO2泡沫在提高采收率过程中的传播距离

M. Izadi, S. Kam
{"title":"利用气泡种群平衡模型预测CO2泡沫在提高采收率过程中的传播距离","authors":"M. Izadi, S. Kam","doi":"10.2118/191202-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A mechanistic foam modeling technique based on bubble population balance, which honors three different foam states (weak-foam, strong-foam, and intermediate states) and two steady-state strong-foam flow regimes (high-quality regime and low-quality regime of the strong-foam state), is developed to investigate how CO2 foam behaves rheologically and propagates in a petroleum reservoir. The model parameters are first obtained from a fit to existing laboratory coreflood experimental data, and then the mechanistic model is applied to different types of CO2 foams, ranging from gaseous to supercritical CO2 foams, represented by various mobilization pressure gradients.\n The results from the fit to existing coreflood data show that a reasonable match can be made satisfying multiple constraints such as hysteresis exerted by three foam states, non-Newtonian flow behavior caused by gas trapping and shear thinning rheology, and bubble stability at different capillary pressure environments. Among different sets of input parameters resulting in equally nice fits, an additional experimental data (for example, the onset of foam generation by increasing the total flow rate step by step at fixed foam quality) can help narrow down the range of input parameters further. When applied to field-scale scenarios, supercritical CO2 foams requiring low mobilization pressure gradient propagate much further than gaseous CO2 foams, far enough to make use of supercritical CO2 foams promising in the fields. This in turn proves theoretically why supercritical CO2 foams should be preferred in the field compared to gaseous CO2 foams. The model shows foams in the low-quality regime can propagate longer distance than foams in the high-quality regime because of better foam stability at lower capillary pressure environment.","PeriodicalId":352851,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, June 25, 2018","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bubble Population Balance Modeling to Predict Propagation Distance of CO2 Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes\",\"authors\":\"M. Izadi, S. Kam\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191202-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A mechanistic foam modeling technique based on bubble population balance, which honors three different foam states (weak-foam, strong-foam, and intermediate states) and two steady-state strong-foam flow regimes (high-quality regime and low-quality regime of the strong-foam state), is developed to investigate how CO2 foam behaves rheologically and propagates in a petroleum reservoir. The model parameters are first obtained from a fit to existing laboratory coreflood experimental data, and then the mechanistic model is applied to different types of CO2 foams, ranging from gaseous to supercritical CO2 foams, represented by various mobilization pressure gradients.\\n The results from the fit to existing coreflood data show that a reasonable match can be made satisfying multiple constraints such as hysteresis exerted by three foam states, non-Newtonian flow behavior caused by gas trapping and shear thinning rheology, and bubble stability at different capillary pressure environments. Among different sets of input parameters resulting in equally nice fits, an additional experimental data (for example, the onset of foam generation by increasing the total flow rate step by step at fixed foam quality) can help narrow down the range of input parameters further. When applied to field-scale scenarios, supercritical CO2 foams requiring low mobilization pressure gradient propagate much further than gaseous CO2 foams, far enough to make use of supercritical CO2 foams promising in the fields. This in turn proves theoretically why supercritical CO2 foams should be preferred in the field compared to gaseous CO2 foams. The model shows foams in the low-quality regime can propagate longer distance than foams in the high-quality regime because of better foam stability at lower capillary pressure environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, June 25, 2018\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, June 25, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191202-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, June 25, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191202-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

基于气泡种群平衡的机械泡沫建模技术,考虑了三种不同的泡沫状态(弱泡沫、强泡沫和中间状态)和两种稳定的强泡沫流动状态(强泡沫状态的高质量状态和低质量状态),旨在研究二氧化碳泡沫在油藏中的流变行为和传播方式。首先通过拟合现有实验室岩心驱油实验数据获得模型参数,然后将该机理模型应用于不同类型的CO2泡沫,从气态到超临界CO2泡沫,并以不同的动员压力梯度为代表。与现有岩心驱油数据的拟合结果表明,在满足三种泡沫状态的滞后性、气体捕获和剪切变薄流变引起的非牛顿流动行为以及不同毛管压力环境下的气泡稳定性等约束条件下,可以进行合理的拟合。在产生同样良好拟合的不同输入参数集中,额外的实验数据(例如,在固定泡沫质量下逐步增加总流量产生泡沫的开始)可以帮助进一步缩小输入参数的范围。当应用于现场规模的场景时,需要低动员压力梯度的超临界CO2泡沫比气态CO2泡沫传播得更远,足以使超临界CO2泡沫在现场得到应用。这反过来从理论上证明了为什么超临界CO2泡沫比气态CO2泡沫在现场更受欢迎。模型表明,低质量区泡沫在较低的毛细压力环境下具有更好的泡沫稳定性,因此泡沫的传播距离比高质量区泡沫的传播距离要长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bubble Population Balance Modeling to Predict Propagation Distance of CO2 Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes
A mechanistic foam modeling technique based on bubble population balance, which honors three different foam states (weak-foam, strong-foam, and intermediate states) and two steady-state strong-foam flow regimes (high-quality regime and low-quality regime of the strong-foam state), is developed to investigate how CO2 foam behaves rheologically and propagates in a petroleum reservoir. The model parameters are first obtained from a fit to existing laboratory coreflood experimental data, and then the mechanistic model is applied to different types of CO2 foams, ranging from gaseous to supercritical CO2 foams, represented by various mobilization pressure gradients. The results from the fit to existing coreflood data show that a reasonable match can be made satisfying multiple constraints such as hysteresis exerted by three foam states, non-Newtonian flow behavior caused by gas trapping and shear thinning rheology, and bubble stability at different capillary pressure environments. Among different sets of input parameters resulting in equally nice fits, an additional experimental data (for example, the onset of foam generation by increasing the total flow rate step by step at fixed foam quality) can help narrow down the range of input parameters further. When applied to field-scale scenarios, supercritical CO2 foams requiring low mobilization pressure gradient propagate much further than gaseous CO2 foams, far enough to make use of supercritical CO2 foams promising in the fields. This in turn proves theoretically why supercritical CO2 foams should be preferred in the field compared to gaseous CO2 foams. The model shows foams in the low-quality regime can propagate longer distance than foams in the high-quality regime because of better foam stability at lower capillary pressure environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信