衡量创伤严重程度的最常见工具:一项综述研究

A. Tafti, K. Nasiriani, M. Hajimaghsoudi, M. Maki, S. Mirzaei, A. Eftekhari
{"title":"衡量创伤严重程度的最常见工具:一项综述研究","authors":"A. Tafti, K. Nasiriani, M. Hajimaghsoudi, M. Maki, S. Mirzaei, A. Eftekhari","doi":"10.18502/jder.v2i2.1517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Due to the increasing mortality rate from trauma, determining the severity of injury has a very important role in the prognosis of the injured person. On the other hand, the quality of medical care provided to the casualties is evaluated using the Trauma Scoring System. Various scales were used to determine the trauma severity of injured. In this study, the most commonly used tools are investigated. \nMethods: This review was conducted by searching throughout the Persian data bases of Magiran, Barakat, SID and English databases of Scopus, Web of sciences, PubMed, and Google scholar. To conduct the search, the following keywords were used: \"Severity of Trauma\", \"Trauma scoring\", and \"Trauma Scoring System\" without considering any time intervals. Our early search resulted in 2125 articles. Finally, 17 articles were analyzed and different functions of traumatic assessment tools were compared and studied. \nResults: Traumatic assessment methods vary based on the anatomical and physiological parameters and composition of these two methods. In this study, the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) were considered as anatomical parameters; Revised Trauma Score (RTS) as physiological parameters; Trauma Score Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOST) were mentioned as a hybrid ranking system. \nConclusion: Application of accurate scientific evaluations in trauma severity assessment methods and application of each method in its appropriate position would result in appropriate improvements in the development of trauma care.  In addition, these systems can play an important role in providing care to patients with traumatic injuries in the present and future.","PeriodicalId":261201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Disaster and Emergency Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Most Common Tools to Measure Trauma Severity: A review Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Tafti, K. Nasiriani, M. Hajimaghsoudi, M. Maki, S. Mirzaei, A. Eftekhari\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jder.v2i2.1517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Due to the increasing mortality rate from trauma, determining the severity of injury has a very important role in the prognosis of the injured person. On the other hand, the quality of medical care provided to the casualties is evaluated using the Trauma Scoring System. Various scales were used to determine the trauma severity of injured. In this study, the most commonly used tools are investigated. \\nMethods: This review was conducted by searching throughout the Persian data bases of Magiran, Barakat, SID and English databases of Scopus, Web of sciences, PubMed, and Google scholar. To conduct the search, the following keywords were used: \\\"Severity of Trauma\\\", \\\"Trauma scoring\\\", and \\\"Trauma Scoring System\\\" without considering any time intervals. Our early search resulted in 2125 articles. Finally, 17 articles were analyzed and different functions of traumatic assessment tools were compared and studied. \\nResults: Traumatic assessment methods vary based on the anatomical and physiological parameters and composition of these two methods. In this study, the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) were considered as anatomical parameters; Revised Trauma Score (RTS) as physiological parameters; Trauma Score Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOST) were mentioned as a hybrid ranking system. \\nConclusion: Application of accurate scientific evaluations in trauma severity assessment methods and application of each method in its appropriate position would result in appropriate improvements in the development of trauma care.  In addition, these systems can play an important role in providing care to patients with traumatic injuries in the present and future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Disaster and Emergency Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Disaster and Emergency Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jder.v2i2.1517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Disaster and Emergency Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jder.v2i2.1517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:由于创伤死亡率的不断上升,确定损伤的严重程度对伤者的预后具有非常重要的作用。另一方面,使用创伤评分系统对提供给伤员的医疗服务质量进行评估。采用不同的量表来判断伤者的创伤严重程度。在这项研究中,最常用的工具进行了调查。方法:检索Magiran、Barakat、SID等波斯语数据库和Scopus、Web of sciences、PubMed、Google scholar等英文数据库。为了进行搜索,我们使用了以下关键词:“创伤严重程度”、“创伤评分”和“创伤评分系统”,不考虑任何时间间隔。我们早期的搜索结果是2125篇文章。最后,对17篇文献进行了分析,并对创伤评估工具的不同功能进行了比较研究。结果:创伤评估方法因解剖和生理参数及两种方法的组成而异。本研究以简略损伤量表(AIS)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和新损伤严重程度评分(NISS)作为解剖参数;修订创伤评分(RTS)作为生理参数;创伤评分损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)和创伤严重程度表征(ASCOST)被认为是一种混合评分系统。结论:在创伤严重程度评估方法中应用准确、科学的评价方法,并将各种方法应用于适当的位置,将有助于创伤护理的发展。此外,这些系统可以在现在和将来为创伤性损伤患者提供护理方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Most Common Tools to Measure Trauma Severity: A review Study
Introduction: Due to the increasing mortality rate from trauma, determining the severity of injury has a very important role in the prognosis of the injured person. On the other hand, the quality of medical care provided to the casualties is evaluated using the Trauma Scoring System. Various scales were used to determine the trauma severity of injured. In this study, the most commonly used tools are investigated. Methods: This review was conducted by searching throughout the Persian data bases of Magiran, Barakat, SID and English databases of Scopus, Web of sciences, PubMed, and Google scholar. To conduct the search, the following keywords were used: "Severity of Trauma", "Trauma scoring", and "Trauma Scoring System" without considering any time intervals. Our early search resulted in 2125 articles. Finally, 17 articles were analyzed and different functions of traumatic assessment tools were compared and studied. Results: Traumatic assessment methods vary based on the anatomical and physiological parameters and composition of these two methods. In this study, the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) were considered as anatomical parameters; Revised Trauma Score (RTS) as physiological parameters; Trauma Score Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOST) were mentioned as a hybrid ranking system. Conclusion: Application of accurate scientific evaluations in trauma severity assessment methods and application of each method in its appropriate position would result in appropriate improvements in the development of trauma care.  In addition, these systems can play an important role in providing care to patients with traumatic injuries in the present and future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信