Weiguo Ma, S. Jin, Lili Ma, Rui Fang, Tong-fang Zhang
{"title":"输尿管结石的临床路径模式与传统模式的比较","authors":"Weiguo Ma, S. Jin, Lili Ma, Rui Fang, Tong-fang Zhang","doi":"10.3109/23256176.2014.926114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjective. To compare the differences between the clinical pathway mode and the traditional mode implemented in the treatment of ureteral calculus by referring to different parameters, and to analyze the reasons. Method. A total of 164 cases of ureteral calculus fall into four groups: group A: treating only the calculus with clinical pathway; group B: treating the calculus and other diseases with clinical pathway; group C; treating only the calculus with the traditional mode; group D: treating the calculus and other diseases with the traditional mode. All patients were treated with ureteroscopic ballistic lithotripsy under various types of anesthesia. There were 56 cases in group A, 30 cases in group B, 46 cases in group C, and 32 cases in group D. The statistical methods were used for comparing the following parameters: preoperative average length of stay, average length of stay, total hospitalization expense, drug expense proportion, antibacterial drug expense proportion, and patient satisfactio...","PeriodicalId":163748,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Clinical Pathway Mode with Traditional Mode in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculus\",\"authors\":\"Weiguo Ma, S. Jin, Lili Ma, Rui Fang, Tong-fang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/23256176.2014.926114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractObjective. To compare the differences between the clinical pathway mode and the traditional mode implemented in the treatment of ureteral calculus by referring to different parameters, and to analyze the reasons. Method. A total of 164 cases of ureteral calculus fall into four groups: group A: treating only the calculus with clinical pathway; group B: treating the calculus and other diseases with clinical pathway; group C; treating only the calculus with the traditional mode; group D: treating the calculus and other diseases with the traditional mode. All patients were treated with ureteroscopic ballistic lithotripsy under various types of anesthesia. There were 56 cases in group A, 30 cases in group B, 46 cases in group C, and 32 cases in group D. The statistical methods were used for comparing the following parameters: preoperative average length of stay, average length of stay, total hospitalization expense, drug expense proportion, antibacterial drug expense proportion, and patient satisfactio...\",\"PeriodicalId\":163748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Medical Record English Edition\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Medical Record English Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/23256176.2014.926114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/23256176.2014.926114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Clinical Pathway Mode with Traditional Mode in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculus
AbstractObjective. To compare the differences between the clinical pathway mode and the traditional mode implemented in the treatment of ureteral calculus by referring to different parameters, and to analyze the reasons. Method. A total of 164 cases of ureteral calculus fall into four groups: group A: treating only the calculus with clinical pathway; group B: treating the calculus and other diseases with clinical pathway; group C; treating only the calculus with the traditional mode; group D: treating the calculus and other diseases with the traditional mode. All patients were treated with ureteroscopic ballistic lithotripsy under various types of anesthesia. There were 56 cases in group A, 30 cases in group B, 46 cases in group C, and 32 cases in group D. The statistical methods were used for comparing the following parameters: preoperative average length of stay, average length of stay, total hospitalization expense, drug expense proportion, antibacterial drug expense proportion, and patient satisfactio...