胫骨骨折Ilizarov固定架中Schanz螺钉与k -丝钉钉位感染率的比较

Ziyad Ahmad, Imdad Ullah, M. Izhar, Arsalan Hakim, Wajid Ullah, N. Ahmad
{"title":"胫骨骨折Ilizarov固定架中Schanz螺钉与k -丝钉钉位感染率的比较","authors":"Ziyad Ahmad, Imdad Ullah, M. Izhar, Arsalan Hakim, Wajid Ullah, N. Ahmad","doi":"10.18535/cmhrj.v2i6.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Comparison of pin site infection rate between schanz screws and k-wires in ilizarov fixator for tibial fracture\nMethodology: It was a randomized control trial, conducted at department of Orthopedics, Khyber Teaching Hospital, MTI, and Peshawar from July 2021 to June 2022. Sampling Technique was Non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients were divided into two groups using computer generated random sequence number. Patients in group A were stabilized using K-wires and patients in group B were stabilized using k-wire and schanz screws. Data were entered in specially designed proforma.\nResult: Mean age in group A patients was 35±2.77 years, while in group B it was 38±3.12 years. Gender distribution between two groups was analyzed. In Group A 72.3% were males and 27.7 % females while in Group B patients, 70% were males and 30% were females. Mean duration from injury to surgery was 5 days with SD±2.12 in group A, while 5.5±2.37 days in Group B. Analysis of PSI among both groups shows that Group B, in whom Schanz pins technique was used, had significantly high rates of pin site infection (24.1%) compared to group A (9.6%) in whom K-wires technique was used (p 0.012).\nConclusion: Our study concludes that the frequency of pin site infection is significantly less in Ilizarov fixator using K-wires (9.6%) as compared to Ilizarov fixator using Schanz pins(24.1%).","PeriodicalId":155428,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine And Health Research Journal","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Pin Site Infection Rate between Schanz Screws and K-Wires in Ilizarov Fixator for Tibial Fracture\",\"authors\":\"Ziyad Ahmad, Imdad Ullah, M. Izhar, Arsalan Hakim, Wajid Ullah, N. Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.18535/cmhrj.v2i6.121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Comparison of pin site infection rate between schanz screws and k-wires in ilizarov fixator for tibial fracture\\nMethodology: It was a randomized control trial, conducted at department of Orthopedics, Khyber Teaching Hospital, MTI, and Peshawar from July 2021 to June 2022. Sampling Technique was Non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients were divided into two groups using computer generated random sequence number. Patients in group A were stabilized using K-wires and patients in group B were stabilized using k-wire and schanz screws. Data were entered in specially designed proforma.\\nResult: Mean age in group A patients was 35±2.77 years, while in group B it was 38±3.12 years. Gender distribution between two groups was analyzed. In Group A 72.3% were males and 27.7 % females while in Group B patients, 70% were males and 30% were females. Mean duration from injury to surgery was 5 days with SD±2.12 in group A, while 5.5±2.37 days in Group B. Analysis of PSI among both groups shows that Group B, in whom Schanz pins technique was used, had significantly high rates of pin site infection (24.1%) compared to group A (9.6%) in whom K-wires technique was used (p 0.012).\\nConclusion: Our study concludes that the frequency of pin site infection is significantly less in Ilizarov fixator using K-wires (9.6%) as compared to Ilizarov fixator using Schanz pins(24.1%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":155428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine And Health Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine And Health Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18535/cmhrj.v2i6.121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine And Health Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18535/cmhrj.v2i6.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较胫骨骨折ilizarov固定架中schanz螺钉和k-钢丝的钉位感染率。方法:这是一项随机对照试验,于2021年7月至2022年6月在开伯尔教学医院骨科、MTI和白沙瓦进行。抽样技术为非概率连续抽样。采用计算机生成的随机序列号将患者分为两组。A组采用k-丝固定,B组采用k-丝和schanz螺钉固定。数据是以特别设计的形式输入的。结果:A组患者平均年龄35±2.77岁,B组患者平均年龄38±3.12岁。分析两组间的性别分布。A组患者中男性占72.3%,女性占27.7%;B组患者中男性占70%,女性占30%。从损伤到手术的平均时间为5 d, A组SD±2.12,B组SD为5.5±2.37 d。两组间PSI分析显示,使用Schanz针技术的B组针部感染率(24.1%)明显高于使用k针技术的A组(9.6%)(p 0.012)。结论:使用k针的Ilizarov固定器的针部感染频率(9.6%)明显低于使用Schanz针的Ilizarov固定器(24.1%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Pin Site Infection Rate between Schanz Screws and K-Wires in Ilizarov Fixator for Tibial Fracture
Objective: Comparison of pin site infection rate between schanz screws and k-wires in ilizarov fixator for tibial fracture Methodology: It was a randomized control trial, conducted at department of Orthopedics, Khyber Teaching Hospital, MTI, and Peshawar from July 2021 to June 2022. Sampling Technique was Non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients were divided into two groups using computer generated random sequence number. Patients in group A were stabilized using K-wires and patients in group B were stabilized using k-wire and schanz screws. Data were entered in specially designed proforma. Result: Mean age in group A patients was 35±2.77 years, while in group B it was 38±3.12 years. Gender distribution between two groups was analyzed. In Group A 72.3% were males and 27.7 % females while in Group B patients, 70% were males and 30% were females. Mean duration from injury to surgery was 5 days with SD±2.12 in group A, while 5.5±2.37 days in Group B. Analysis of PSI among both groups shows that Group B, in whom Schanz pins technique was used, had significantly high rates of pin site infection (24.1%) compared to group A (9.6%) in whom K-wires technique was used (p 0.012). Conclusion: Our study concludes that the frequency of pin site infection is significantly less in Ilizarov fixator using K-wires (9.6%) as compared to Ilizarov fixator using Schanz pins(24.1%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信