Agnieszka Narożniak, Marcin Princ
{"title":"Certyfikat szczepionkowy jako instrument prawnej regulacji międzynarodowego ruchu osobowego","authors":"Agnieszka Narożniak, Marcin Princ","doi":"10.14746/spp.2022.2.38.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic affected almost all the inhabitants of the globe, and mi-grants were among those who felt it particularly hard. Their problems were largely related to numerous limitations in the international movement of persons. As part of the fight against these effects, national governments have initiated a discussion on the idea of launching vaccine certificates, sometimes called “Covid passports”. The concept has been developed and has led to the adoption of specific solutions in various countries, as well as on a wider, regional scale, in particular in the form of the EU digital COVID certificate. In the paper, the authors outline individual concepts and consider whether a vac-cine certificate does indeed bear the features of a travel document and whether it is justified to use this term. They go on to contrast the idea of issuing such certificates with national, EU and regional law. Finally, they reflect on what formal and material conditions must be met by such a document in order to enable the holder to cross borders, and whether such tools can be reused in the event of future pandemics. The research allows several conclusions to be formulated. The EU digital COVID certificate or other certificates cannot be regarded as travel documents, in particular, they cannot be called passports. Vaccine certificates are not meant to be a privilege or a restriction, but only an instrument that allows possible restrictions in the international movement of persons to be waived for the holder of the document (assuming that the restrictions themselves are not illegal). They should be consid-ered a temporary measure, applied in extraordinary circumstances as an instrument in the hands of states or state organizations, not private entities. In such a formula, they can also be used in the event of similar epidemic threats in the future.","PeriodicalId":176818,"journal":{"name":"Studia Prawa Publicznego","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Prawa Publicznego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/spp.2022.2.38.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SARS-CoV-2大流行影响了全球几乎所有的居民,而补助金是那些感到特别困难的人之一。他们的问题主要与国际人员流动的许多限制有关。作为对抗这些影响的一部分,各国政府已经开始讨论推出疫苗证书的想法,有时也被称为“Covid护照”。这一概念已经得到发展,并在各国以及更广泛的区域范围内采用了具体的解决方案,特别是以欧盟数字COVID证书的形式。在论文中,作者概述了个别概念,并考虑疫苗证书是否确实具有旅行证件的特征,以及使用这一术语是否合理。他们接着将颁发此类证书的想法与国家、欧盟和地区法律进行了对比。最后,它们反映了此类文件必须满足哪些正式和物质条件才能使持有人能够跨越国界,以及在未来发生大流行病时是否可以重复使用这些工具。这项研究可以得出几个结论。欧盟数字新冠证书或其他证书不能视为旅行证件,特别是不能称为护照。疫苗证书并不是一种特权或限制,而只是一种工具,允许对证件持有人在人员的国际流动方面免除可能的限制(假设这些限制本身不是非法的)。它们应被视为一种临时措施,在特殊情况下作为国家或国家组织手中的工具,而不是私人实体。在这样一个公式中,它们也可以用于未来发生类似流行病威胁的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Certyfikat szczepionkowy jako instrument prawnej regulacji międzynarodowego ruchu osobowego
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic affected almost all the inhabitants of the globe, and mi-grants were among those who felt it particularly hard. Their problems were largely related to numerous limitations in the international movement of persons. As part of the fight against these effects, national governments have initiated a discussion on the idea of launching vaccine certificates, sometimes called “Covid passports”. The concept has been developed and has led to the adoption of specific solutions in various countries, as well as on a wider, regional scale, in particular in the form of the EU digital COVID certificate. In the paper, the authors outline individual concepts and consider whether a vac-cine certificate does indeed bear the features of a travel document and whether it is justified to use this term. They go on to contrast the idea of issuing such certificates with national, EU and regional law. Finally, they reflect on what formal and material conditions must be met by such a document in order to enable the holder to cross borders, and whether such tools can be reused in the event of future pandemics. The research allows several conclusions to be formulated. The EU digital COVID certificate or other certificates cannot be regarded as travel documents, in particular, they cannot be called passports. Vaccine certificates are not meant to be a privilege or a restriction, but only an instrument that allows possible restrictions in the international movement of persons to be waived for the holder of the document (assuming that the restrictions themselves are not illegal). They should be consid-ered a temporary measure, applied in extraordinary circumstances as an instrument in the hands of states or state organizations, not private entities. In such a formula, they can also be used in the event of similar epidemic threats in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信