公共空间是公共利益。安全与公民共存

Vicenç Aguado i Cudolà
{"title":"公共空间是公共利益。安全与公民共存","authors":"Vicenç Aguado i Cudolà","doi":"10.18847/1.17.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public space constitutes the scope for the general use and enjoyment of all people, in the exercise of their rights and freedoms. However, the traditional regulation has been oriented to conceive it from essentially productive coordinates, a situation that has led to the exclusion of poverty, its criminalization and stigmatization. In this sense, zero tolerance policies should be framed, the result of the theoretical framework promoted under the metaphor of \"broken windows\", as the basis for the repression of low-intensity offenses, as well as the legal framework of citizen coexistence ordinances. This paper defends the need to configure public space within the framework of a city of care, building public policies that allow the recovery of the city for all citizens. In this sense, the configuration of public space becomes relevant, not only from the idea of public property or ownership that the public domain entails, but also from its conception as a common good that allows the participation of citizens in its management. The assumption of responsibilities of the citizenry, shared with the Administration, can constitute an instrument for the public space to constitute a safe and respectful environment for the exercise of rights and freedoms. It is proposed to provide concrete content to the right to public space as a manifestation of the right to the city, which allows giving tools to citizens to guarantee its functionality. Correlatively, the idea of responsibility also entails the assumption of duties by the citizenry that should be incorporated into local legislation. Likewise, the role that local ordinances can carry out to guarantee this right to public space is examined. Finally, it alludes to the experience that is being implemented in the municipalities of civic officers as means that can contribute to the realization of this right to public space.","PeriodicalId":411681,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El espacio público como bien común. Seguridad y convivencia ciudadana\",\"authors\":\"Vicenç Aguado i Cudolà\",\"doi\":\"10.18847/1.17.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public space constitutes the scope for the general use and enjoyment of all people, in the exercise of their rights and freedoms. However, the traditional regulation has been oriented to conceive it from essentially productive coordinates, a situation that has led to the exclusion of poverty, its criminalization and stigmatization. In this sense, zero tolerance policies should be framed, the result of the theoretical framework promoted under the metaphor of \\\"broken windows\\\", as the basis for the repression of low-intensity offenses, as well as the legal framework of citizen coexistence ordinances. This paper defends the need to configure public space within the framework of a city of care, building public policies that allow the recovery of the city for all citizens. In this sense, the configuration of public space becomes relevant, not only from the idea of public property or ownership that the public domain entails, but also from its conception as a common good that allows the participation of citizens in its management. The assumption of responsibilities of the citizenry, shared with the Administration, can constitute an instrument for the public space to constitute a safe and respectful environment for the exercise of rights and freedoms. It is proposed to provide concrete content to the right to public space as a manifestation of the right to the city, which allows giving tools to citizens to guarantee its functionality. Correlatively, the idea of responsibility also entails the assumption of duties by the citizenry that should be incorporated into local legislation. Likewise, the role that local ordinances can carry out to guarantee this right to public space is examined. Finally, it alludes to the experience that is being implemented in the municipalities of civic officers as means that can contribute to the realization of this right to public space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18847/1.17.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18847/1.17.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共空间是所有人在行使其权利和自由时普遍利用和享受的空间。然而,传统的规定的方向是从基本上是生产性的坐标出发,这种情况导致排除贫穷,将贫穷定为犯罪和污名化。从这个意义上说,零容忍政策应该作为“破窗”隐喻下推动的理论框架的结果,作为镇压低强度违法行为的基础,以及公民共存条例的法律框架。本文认为,需要在关怀城市的框架内配置公共空间,制定公共政策,为所有公民恢复城市。从这个意义上说,公共空间的配置变得相关,不仅来自公共领域所需要的公共财产或所有权的概念,而且来自其作为一种允许公民参与其管理的共同利益的概念。与行政当局共同承担公民的责任,可以成为公共空间的一种工具,为行使权利和自由创造一个安全和受尊重的环境。建议为公共空间权提供具体内容,作为城市权的一种表现形式,为公民提供保障其功能的工具。相应的,责任的概念也要求公民承担应纳入地方立法的义务。同样,对地方法令在保障这一公共空间权利方面可以发挥的作用进行了审查。最后,它提到了市政官员正在实施的经验,作为有助于实现这一公共空间权利的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El espacio público como bien común. Seguridad y convivencia ciudadana
Public space constitutes the scope for the general use and enjoyment of all people, in the exercise of their rights and freedoms. However, the traditional regulation has been oriented to conceive it from essentially productive coordinates, a situation that has led to the exclusion of poverty, its criminalization and stigmatization. In this sense, zero tolerance policies should be framed, the result of the theoretical framework promoted under the metaphor of "broken windows", as the basis for the repression of low-intensity offenses, as well as the legal framework of citizen coexistence ordinances. This paper defends the need to configure public space within the framework of a city of care, building public policies that allow the recovery of the city for all citizens. In this sense, the configuration of public space becomes relevant, not only from the idea of public property or ownership that the public domain entails, but also from its conception as a common good that allows the participation of citizens in its management. The assumption of responsibilities of the citizenry, shared with the Administration, can constitute an instrument for the public space to constitute a safe and respectful environment for the exercise of rights and freedoms. It is proposed to provide concrete content to the right to public space as a manifestation of the right to the city, which allows giving tools to citizens to guarantee its functionality. Correlatively, the idea of responsibility also entails the assumption of duties by the citizenry that should be incorporated into local legislation. Likewise, the role that local ordinances can carry out to guarantee this right to public space is examined. Finally, it alludes to the experience that is being implemented in the municipalities of civic officers as means that can contribute to the realization of this right to public space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信