传统扁桃体切除术与激光辅助扁桃体切除术临床效果的比较研究

Vijayasundaram Sundararajan, S. Rao, B. R. Preetham, Junior Resident
{"title":"传统扁桃体切除术与激光辅助扁桃体切除术临床效果的比较研究","authors":"Vijayasundaram Sundararajan, S. Rao, B. R. Preetham, Junior Resident","doi":"10.17511/jooo.2019.i04.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A number of published studies have compared the KTP laser with standard dissection technique for tonsillectomy and safety of the laser is well described. This study aims to have a comprehensive insight into the comparative clinical outcomes for conventional tonsillectomy with KTP-532 laser assisted tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods : Prospective, comparative study enrolling 60 patients with chronic adenotonsillitis who visited the department of ENT, NRI Medical college and General hospital of a Tertiary referral centre from June 2018 to July 2019. After confirming the diagnosis, the patients were subjected to a detailed history and clinical examination and the patients were divided into two groups – The patients (30 cases) in the first half of this period underwent conventional tonsillectomy whereas the rest (30 cases) underwent laser tonsillectomy. All patients in this study were assessed for operative time, blood loss, post-operative pain, tonsillar fossa healing and incidence of haemorrhage. The differences between studied groups less than 0.5 (p<0.05) considered significant statically. Results: It was observed that total time taken for surgery, mean blood loss, intra-op blood loss, and post-op pain at Day 0 were comparatively less in Group B. While post-op pain at Day 14 was less in Group A. Moreover, Post -op Pain at Day 7, incidence of haemorrhage and healing of tonsillar fossa showed no significant difference in both groups. Conclusion: Laser assisted tonsillectomy is a safe alternative to conventional tonsillectomy associated with low intraoperative bleeding and less time-consuming surgery when compared to conventional tonsillectomy.","PeriodicalId":112259,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of clinical outcomes following conventional versus laser assisted tonsillectomy\",\"authors\":\"Vijayasundaram Sundararajan, S. Rao, B. R. Preetham, Junior Resident\",\"doi\":\"10.17511/jooo.2019.i04.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: A number of published studies have compared the KTP laser with standard dissection technique for tonsillectomy and safety of the laser is well described. This study aims to have a comprehensive insight into the comparative clinical outcomes for conventional tonsillectomy with KTP-532 laser assisted tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods : Prospective, comparative study enrolling 60 patients with chronic adenotonsillitis who visited the department of ENT, NRI Medical college and General hospital of a Tertiary referral centre from June 2018 to July 2019. After confirming the diagnosis, the patients were subjected to a detailed history and clinical examination and the patients were divided into two groups – The patients (30 cases) in the first half of this period underwent conventional tonsillectomy whereas the rest (30 cases) underwent laser tonsillectomy. All patients in this study were assessed for operative time, blood loss, post-operative pain, tonsillar fossa healing and incidence of haemorrhage. The differences between studied groups less than 0.5 (p<0.05) considered significant statically. Results: It was observed that total time taken for surgery, mean blood loss, intra-op blood loss, and post-op pain at Day 0 were comparatively less in Group B. While post-op pain at Day 14 was less in Group A. Moreover, Post -op Pain at Day 7, incidence of haemorrhage and healing of tonsillar fossa showed no significant difference in both groups. Conclusion: Laser assisted tonsillectomy is a safe alternative to conventional tonsillectomy associated with low intraoperative bleeding and less time-consuming surgery when compared to conventional tonsillectomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17511/jooo.2019.i04.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17511/jooo.2019.i04.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多已发表的研究比较了KTP激光与标准解剖技术用于扁桃体切除术,并对激光的安全性进行了很好的描述。本研究旨在全面了解传统扁桃体切除术与KTP-532激光辅助扁桃体切除术的临床效果对比。材料与方法:前瞻性比较研究,纳入2018年6月至2019年7月在某三级转诊中心耳鼻喉科、NRI医学院和总医院就诊的60例慢性腺扁桃体炎患者。确诊后,对患者进行详细的病史和临床检查,并将患者分为两组,前半期患者(30例)行常规扁桃体切除术,其余患者(30例)行激光扁桃体切除术。本研究对所有患者进行手术时间、出血量、术后疼痛、扁桃体窝愈合和出血发生率的评估。研究组间差异小于0.5 (p<0.05)认为具有统计学意义。结果:b组手术总时间、平均出血量、术中出血量、术后第0天疼痛相对较少,a组术后第14天疼痛相对较少,两组术后第7天疼痛、扁桃体窝出血发生率及愈合情况无显著差异。结论:与传统扁桃体切除术相比,激光辅助扁桃体切除术是一种安全的选择,术中出血少,手术时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of clinical outcomes following conventional versus laser assisted tonsillectomy
Introduction: A number of published studies have compared the KTP laser with standard dissection technique for tonsillectomy and safety of the laser is well described. This study aims to have a comprehensive insight into the comparative clinical outcomes for conventional tonsillectomy with KTP-532 laser assisted tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods : Prospective, comparative study enrolling 60 patients with chronic adenotonsillitis who visited the department of ENT, NRI Medical college and General hospital of a Tertiary referral centre from June 2018 to July 2019. After confirming the diagnosis, the patients were subjected to a detailed history and clinical examination and the patients were divided into two groups – The patients (30 cases) in the first half of this period underwent conventional tonsillectomy whereas the rest (30 cases) underwent laser tonsillectomy. All patients in this study were assessed for operative time, blood loss, post-operative pain, tonsillar fossa healing and incidence of haemorrhage. The differences between studied groups less than 0.5 (p<0.05) considered significant statically. Results: It was observed that total time taken for surgery, mean blood loss, intra-op blood loss, and post-op pain at Day 0 were comparatively less in Group B. While post-op pain at Day 14 was less in Group A. Moreover, Post -op Pain at Day 7, incidence of haemorrhage and healing of tonsillar fossa showed no significant difference in both groups. Conclusion: Laser assisted tonsillectomy is a safe alternative to conventional tonsillectomy associated with low intraoperative bleeding and less time-consuming surgery when compared to conventional tonsillectomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信