心脏病风险水平预测:编织机器学习分类器

Kelibone Eva Mamabolo, Moeketsi Mosia
{"title":"心脏病风险水平预测:编织机器学习分类器","authors":"Kelibone Eva Mamabolo, Moeketsi Mosia","doi":"10.1109/IMITEC50163.2020.9334141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary medical diagnosis is a multifaceted process, requiring accurate patient data, clinical expertise acquired over several years and a philosophical perceptive of relevant medical literature. The numerous uncertainty risk factors which characterises heart disease mean that the diagnosis of this disorder is a complex task, even for the experts. In an effort to decrease both the time required for disease diagnosis as well as to enhance the accuracy of the diagnosis, clinical decision support systems (DSS) have been developed that incorporate data mining techniques to enhance the disease diagnosis accuracy. When literature is investigated, it has been observed that different researchers report the classifier's performance based on the overall accuracy of the classifier. That is, most researchers would evaluate the classifier's performance and choose the best classifier based on its overall accuracy. The question raised by this study is “What if the best classifier based on the overall accuracy is not a good predictor of a particular class in question within the dataset?” This paper thus presented the diagnosis of heart disease risk level using classification techniques under the data mining approach. A detailed comparative study focuses on how different classifiers predict each heart-disease class during the process of disease diagnosis. The comparative study is discussed using the confusion matrix of each classifier.","PeriodicalId":349926,"journal":{"name":"2020 2nd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart Disease Risk Level Prediction: Knitting Machine Learning Classifiers\",\"authors\":\"Kelibone Eva Mamabolo, Moeketsi Mosia\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMITEC50163.2020.9334141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contemporary medical diagnosis is a multifaceted process, requiring accurate patient data, clinical expertise acquired over several years and a philosophical perceptive of relevant medical literature. The numerous uncertainty risk factors which characterises heart disease mean that the diagnosis of this disorder is a complex task, even for the experts. In an effort to decrease both the time required for disease diagnosis as well as to enhance the accuracy of the diagnosis, clinical decision support systems (DSS) have been developed that incorporate data mining techniques to enhance the disease diagnosis accuracy. When literature is investigated, it has been observed that different researchers report the classifier's performance based on the overall accuracy of the classifier. That is, most researchers would evaluate the classifier's performance and choose the best classifier based on its overall accuracy. The question raised by this study is “What if the best classifier based on the overall accuracy is not a good predictor of a particular class in question within the dataset?” This paper thus presented the diagnosis of heart disease risk level using classification techniques under the data mining approach. A detailed comparative study focuses on how different classifiers predict each heart-disease class during the process of disease diagnosis. The comparative study is discussed using the confusion matrix of each classifier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 2nd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 2nd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMITEC50163.2020.9334141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 2nd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMITEC50163.2020.9334141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代医学诊断是一个多方面的过程,需要准确的患者数据、多年来获得的临床专业知识以及对相关医学文献的哲学洞察力。心脏病的许多不确定的风险因素意味着这种疾病的诊断是一项复杂的任务,即使对专家来说也是如此。为了减少疾病诊断所需的时间和提高诊断的准确性,临床决策支持系统(DSS)的开发结合了数据挖掘技术来提高疾病诊断的准确性。在研究文献时,可以观察到不同的研究人员根据分类器的整体准确性来报告分类器的性能。也就是说,大多数研究人员会根据分类器的整体准确率来评估分类器的性能,选择最好的分类器。这项研究提出的问题是“如果基于整体准确性的最佳分类器不能很好地预测数据集中有问题的特定类别,该怎么办?”因此,本文提出了基于数据挖掘方法的心脏病风险水平分类诊断方法。详细的比较研究侧重于不同的分类器在疾病诊断过程中如何预测每个心脏病类别。利用各分类器的混淆矩阵进行比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heart Disease Risk Level Prediction: Knitting Machine Learning Classifiers
Contemporary medical diagnosis is a multifaceted process, requiring accurate patient data, clinical expertise acquired over several years and a philosophical perceptive of relevant medical literature. The numerous uncertainty risk factors which characterises heart disease mean that the diagnosis of this disorder is a complex task, even for the experts. In an effort to decrease both the time required for disease diagnosis as well as to enhance the accuracy of the diagnosis, clinical decision support systems (DSS) have been developed that incorporate data mining techniques to enhance the disease diagnosis accuracy. When literature is investigated, it has been observed that different researchers report the classifier's performance based on the overall accuracy of the classifier. That is, most researchers would evaluate the classifier's performance and choose the best classifier based on its overall accuracy. The question raised by this study is “What if the best classifier based on the overall accuracy is not a good predictor of a particular class in question within the dataset?” This paper thus presented the diagnosis of heart disease risk level using classification techniques under the data mining approach. A detailed comparative study focuses on how different classifiers predict each heart-disease class during the process of disease diagnosis. The comparative study is discussed using the confusion matrix of each classifier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信