最博学的法官

The Green Bag Pub Date : 2015-08-18 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2647032
Brian L. Frye
{"title":"最博学的法官","authors":"Brian L. Frye","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2647032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supreme Court justices both use and produce legal scholarship. This article identifies the ten most scholarly justices, based on both productivity and impact. The results suggest that scholarly productivity and scholarly impact are only partially correlated. They also suggest that scholarly productivity peaked in the mid-20th Century, but scholarly impact is broadly distributed.","PeriodicalId":245319,"journal":{"name":"The Green Bag","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Most Scholarly Justices\",\"authors\":\"Brian L. Frye\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2647032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supreme Court justices both use and produce legal scholarship. This article identifies the ten most scholarly justices, based on both productivity and impact. The results suggest that scholarly productivity and scholarly impact are only partially correlated. They also suggest that scholarly productivity peaked in the mid-20th Century, but scholarly impact is broadly distributed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Green Bag\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Green Bag\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2647032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Green Bag","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2647032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最高法院的法官们既使用也产生法律奖学金。本文根据生产力和影响力确定了十位最具学术性的大法官。研究结果表明,学术生产力与学术影响仅部分相关。他们还认为,学术生产力在20世纪中期达到顶峰,但学术影响是广泛分布的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Most Scholarly Justices
Supreme Court justices both use and produce legal scholarship. This article identifies the ten most scholarly justices, based on both productivity and impact. The results suggest that scholarly productivity and scholarly impact are only partially correlated. They also suggest that scholarly productivity peaked in the mid-20th Century, but scholarly impact is broadly distributed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信