作为交易的雇佣

Rachel S. Arnow-Richman
{"title":"作为交易的雇佣","authors":"Rachel S. Arnow-Richman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1154082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This piece offers a fresh perspective on the upper-level employment law class based on the theme of employment as transaction. Like much of law school, employment law is often taught from a public advocacy perspective in which the primary role of the lawyer is to vindicate workers' rights or responsively defend managerial action. As a doctrinal matter, however, courts are showing increased attention to the role of private ordering in defining workplace rights and assessing liability, even in regulatory areas. Courts routinely examine employers' efforts to redress unlawful behavior under antidiscrimination law and consistently sanction the use of arbitration agreements waiving rights to a federal jury trial if they satisfy the requisite contract formalities. At the same time, an evolving branch of employment law scholarship has recognized the role of corporate actors and other intermediaries in achieving the normative goals of workplace regulation. Thus, the way in which employers internally implement and respond to the law is an important site of study for those seeking to ensure the realization of legal rights. These complementary developments in law and theory provide both a unifying theoretical framework for teaching employment law and policy and an opportunity to reconfigure the course to address both recent and long-standing critiques of legal education. A principle insight of the Carnegie Foundation's 2007 report on the quality of legal education is that legal pedagogy artificially segregates instruction in substantive expertise, practical skills, and professional values. Using an actual class exercise as an illustration, the piece demonstrates how a basic employment law course can be redeployed as a skills/doctrine hybrid that not only integrates practical training into the substantive course, but exposes students to the especially neglected area of transactional skills. Incorporating a transactional learning experience is a significant stride toward preparing students for a proactive practice in which they are capable of counseling clients, ensuring regulatory compliance, and managing risk, skills sorely needed in a world of increasingly transactionalized relationships.","PeriodicalId":337841,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employment as Transaction\",\"authors\":\"Rachel S. Arnow-Richman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1154082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This piece offers a fresh perspective on the upper-level employment law class based on the theme of employment as transaction. Like much of law school, employment law is often taught from a public advocacy perspective in which the primary role of the lawyer is to vindicate workers' rights or responsively defend managerial action. As a doctrinal matter, however, courts are showing increased attention to the role of private ordering in defining workplace rights and assessing liability, even in regulatory areas. Courts routinely examine employers' efforts to redress unlawful behavior under antidiscrimination law and consistently sanction the use of arbitration agreements waiving rights to a federal jury trial if they satisfy the requisite contract formalities. At the same time, an evolving branch of employment law scholarship has recognized the role of corporate actors and other intermediaries in achieving the normative goals of workplace regulation. Thus, the way in which employers internally implement and respond to the law is an important site of study for those seeking to ensure the realization of legal rights. These complementary developments in law and theory provide both a unifying theoretical framework for teaching employment law and policy and an opportunity to reconfigure the course to address both recent and long-standing critiques of legal education. A principle insight of the Carnegie Foundation's 2007 report on the quality of legal education is that legal pedagogy artificially segregates instruction in substantive expertise, practical skills, and professional values. Using an actual class exercise as an illustration, the piece demonstrates how a basic employment law course can be redeployed as a skills/doctrine hybrid that not only integrates practical training into the substantive course, but exposes students to the especially neglected area of transactional skills. Incorporating a transactional learning experience is a significant stride toward preparing students for a proactive practice in which they are capable of counseling clients, ensuring regulatory compliance, and managing risk, skills sorely needed in a world of increasingly transactionalized relationships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Education eJournal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Education eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1154082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1154082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文以“就业即交易”为主题,提供了一个新的视角来审视上层就业法课堂。像许多法学院一样,就业法通常是从公共倡导的角度来教授的,其中律师的主要角色是维护工人的权利或响应性地为管理行为辩护。然而,作为一个理论问题,法院越来越重视私人命令在确定工作场所权利和评估责任方面的作用,甚至在管理领域也是如此。法院定期审查雇主根据反歧视法纠正非法行为的努力,并一贯批准使用仲裁协议,如果他们满足必要的合同手续,则放弃联邦陪审团审判的权利。与此同时,一个不断发展的就业法学术分支已经认识到公司行为者和其他中介机构在实现工作场所监管的规范性目标方面的作用。因此,对于那些寻求确保合法权利实现的人来说,雇主如何在内部实施和应对法律是一个重要的研究领域。法律和理论的这些互补发展既为就业法和政策的教学提供了统一的理论框架,也为重新配置课程提供了机会,以解决最近和长期以来对法律教育的批评。卡内基基金会2007年关于法律教育质量的报告的一个主要观点是,法律教育人为地将实质性专业知识、实践技能和专业价值观的教学分开。本文以实际的课堂练习为例,展示了如何将基本的就业法课程重新部署为技能/理论的混合体,不仅将实践训练整合到实质性课程中,而且使学生接触到特别被忽视的交易技能领域。结合事务性学习经验是为学生准备主动实践的重要一步,在这种实践中,他们能够为客户提供咨询,确保法规遵从,并管理风险,这些技能在日益事务性关系的世界中是非常需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Employment as Transaction
This piece offers a fresh perspective on the upper-level employment law class based on the theme of employment as transaction. Like much of law school, employment law is often taught from a public advocacy perspective in which the primary role of the lawyer is to vindicate workers' rights or responsively defend managerial action. As a doctrinal matter, however, courts are showing increased attention to the role of private ordering in defining workplace rights and assessing liability, even in regulatory areas. Courts routinely examine employers' efforts to redress unlawful behavior under antidiscrimination law and consistently sanction the use of arbitration agreements waiving rights to a federal jury trial if they satisfy the requisite contract formalities. At the same time, an evolving branch of employment law scholarship has recognized the role of corporate actors and other intermediaries in achieving the normative goals of workplace regulation. Thus, the way in which employers internally implement and respond to the law is an important site of study for those seeking to ensure the realization of legal rights. These complementary developments in law and theory provide both a unifying theoretical framework for teaching employment law and policy and an opportunity to reconfigure the course to address both recent and long-standing critiques of legal education. A principle insight of the Carnegie Foundation's 2007 report on the quality of legal education is that legal pedagogy artificially segregates instruction in substantive expertise, practical skills, and professional values. Using an actual class exercise as an illustration, the piece demonstrates how a basic employment law course can be redeployed as a skills/doctrine hybrid that not only integrates practical training into the substantive course, but exposes students to the especially neglected area of transactional skills. Incorporating a transactional learning experience is a significant stride toward preparing students for a proactive practice in which they are capable of counseling clients, ensuring regulatory compliance, and managing risk, skills sorely needed in a world of increasingly transactionalized relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信