教育领域民族平等原则与政策的差异——中美两国相关优惠政策的比较分析

Q. Lang
{"title":"教育领域民族平等原则与政策的差异——中美两国相关优惠政策的比较分析","authors":"Q. Lang","doi":"10.2991/iceiem-19.2019.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National equality is a basic principle that persists in China's legal and social development. Equality in education is also the foundation. Economic development has not reduced ethnic differences. Although the right to equality in education is legally stipulated, de facto inequality still exists. Although the implementation of a series of preferential policies plays a certain role in educational equality, it breeds the emergence of \"reverse discrimination\". Under the trend of the popularization of education, how to balance the formal equality and the substantive equality of education is a transition inclination or an appropriate guarantee. This paper attempts to draw inspiration for the equality of ethnic education in China by comparing the policies and measures adopted by China and the United States in higher education for ethnic minorities. Keywords—National education; Equality; Preferential policies; China and the United States","PeriodicalId":448323,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Education Innovation and Economic Management (ICEIEM 2019)","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in the Principles and Policies of National Equality in the Field of Education—Comparative analysis of relevant preferential policies between China and the United States\",\"authors\":\"Q. Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/iceiem-19.2019.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"National equality is a basic principle that persists in China's legal and social development. Equality in education is also the foundation. Economic development has not reduced ethnic differences. Although the right to equality in education is legally stipulated, de facto inequality still exists. Although the implementation of a series of preferential policies plays a certain role in educational equality, it breeds the emergence of \\\"reverse discrimination\\\". Under the trend of the popularization of education, how to balance the formal equality and the substantive equality of education is a transition inclination or an appropriate guarantee. This paper attempts to draw inspiration for the equality of ethnic education in China by comparing the policies and measures adopted by China and the United States in higher education for ethnic minorities. Keywords—National education; Equality; Preferential policies; China and the United States\",\"PeriodicalId\":448323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Education Innovation and Economic Management (ICEIEM 2019)\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Education Innovation and Economic Management (ICEIEM 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/iceiem-19.2019.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Education Innovation and Economic Management (ICEIEM 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/iceiem-19.2019.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

民族平等是中国法律和社会发展的一项基本原则。教育平等也是基础。经济发展并没有减少种族差异。虽然法律规定了教育平等权,但事实上的不平等仍然存在。一系列优惠政策的实施虽然对教育公平起到了一定的促进作用,但也滋生了“反向歧视”的出现。在教育大众化的趋势下,如何平衡教育的形式平等与实质平等是一种过渡倾向或适当的保障。本文试图通过比较中美两国在少数民族高等教育中所采取的政策和措施,为中国民族教育的平等提供启示。Keywords-National教育;平等;优惠政策;中国和美国
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in the Principles and Policies of National Equality in the Field of Education—Comparative analysis of relevant preferential policies between China and the United States
National equality is a basic principle that persists in China's legal and social development. Equality in education is also the foundation. Economic development has not reduced ethnic differences. Although the right to equality in education is legally stipulated, de facto inequality still exists. Although the implementation of a series of preferential policies plays a certain role in educational equality, it breeds the emergence of "reverse discrimination". Under the trend of the popularization of education, how to balance the formal equality and the substantive equality of education is a transition inclination or an appropriate guarantee. This paper attempts to draw inspiration for the equality of ethnic education in China by comparing the policies and measures adopted by China and the United States in higher education for ethnic minorities. Keywords—National education; Equality; Preferential policies; China and the United States
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信