久坐行为、脑源性神经营养因子和中年脑结构:青年人冠状动脉风险发展的纵向脑MRI亚研究

Xuan Zhang, O. Meirelles, Zhiguang Li, K. Yaffe, R. Bryan, C. Qiu, L. Launer
{"title":"久坐行为、脑源性神经营养因子和中年脑结构:青年人冠状动脉风险发展的纵向脑MRI亚研究","authors":"Xuan Zhang, O. Meirelles, Zhiguang Li, K. Yaffe, R. Bryan, C. Qiu, L. Launer","doi":"10.3389/frdem.2023.1110553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels are higher in those who are physically active and lower in people with cognitive dysfunction. This study investigated whether brain-derived neurotrophic factor mediated or modified the association of sedentary time to MRI-estimated brain volumes in midlife. Methods Baseline (n = 612) and five-year follow-up (n = 418) data were drawn from the multicenter Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Brain MRI sub-study, including Black and White participants (aged 50.3 years, 51.6% females, 38.6% Black). Sedentary time (hours per day) was categorized into quartiles with low ≤ 4.3 (reference) and high > 8.4. Outcomes of the study were total brain, white matter, gray matter, hippocampal volumes, and white matter fractional anisotropy at baseline and 5-year percent change from baseline. The study used general linear regression models to examine the mediation and moderation effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (natural log transformed) on the associations of sedentary time to brain outcomes. The authors adjusted the regression model for age, sex, race, intracranial volume, education, and vascular factors. Results Cross-sectionally, baseline participants with the highest sedentary time had a lower total brain (−12.2 cc; 95%CI: −20.7, −3.7), gray matter (−7.8 cc; 95%CI: −14.3, −1.3), and hippocampal volume (−0.2 cc; 95%CI: −0.3, 0.0) compared with populations with the lowest sedentary time. The brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels did not mediate the associations between brain measures and sedentary time. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor was found to moderate associations of sedentary time to total brain and white matter volume such that the brain volume difference between high and low sedentary time decreased as brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels increased. Longitudinally, higher baseline brain-derived neurotrophic factor level was associated with less brain volume decline. The longitudinal associations did not differ by sedentary time, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor did not mediate or moderate the association of sedentary time to brain measure changes. Conclusions Higher brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels may buffer the negative effects of sedentary time on the brain.","PeriodicalId":408305,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dementia","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedentary behavior, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and brain structure in midlife: A longitudinal brain MRI sub-study of the coronary artery risk development in young adults study\",\"authors\":\"Xuan Zhang, O. Meirelles, Zhiguang Li, K. Yaffe, R. Bryan, C. Qiu, L. Launer\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frdem.2023.1110553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels are higher in those who are physically active and lower in people with cognitive dysfunction. This study investigated whether brain-derived neurotrophic factor mediated or modified the association of sedentary time to MRI-estimated brain volumes in midlife. Methods Baseline (n = 612) and five-year follow-up (n = 418) data were drawn from the multicenter Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Brain MRI sub-study, including Black and White participants (aged 50.3 years, 51.6% females, 38.6% Black). Sedentary time (hours per day) was categorized into quartiles with low ≤ 4.3 (reference) and high > 8.4. Outcomes of the study were total brain, white matter, gray matter, hippocampal volumes, and white matter fractional anisotropy at baseline and 5-year percent change from baseline. The study used general linear regression models to examine the mediation and moderation effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (natural log transformed) on the associations of sedentary time to brain outcomes. The authors adjusted the regression model for age, sex, race, intracranial volume, education, and vascular factors. Results Cross-sectionally, baseline participants with the highest sedentary time had a lower total brain (−12.2 cc; 95%CI: −20.7, −3.7), gray matter (−7.8 cc; 95%CI: −14.3, −1.3), and hippocampal volume (−0.2 cc; 95%CI: −0.3, 0.0) compared with populations with the lowest sedentary time. The brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels did not mediate the associations between brain measures and sedentary time. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor was found to moderate associations of sedentary time to total brain and white matter volume such that the brain volume difference between high and low sedentary time decreased as brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels increased. Longitudinally, higher baseline brain-derived neurotrophic factor level was associated with less brain volume decline. The longitudinal associations did not differ by sedentary time, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor did not mediate or moderate the association of sedentary time to brain measure changes. Conclusions Higher brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels may buffer the negative effects of sedentary time on the brain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Dementia\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2023.1110553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2023.1110553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑源性神经营养因子水平在体力活动的人群中较高,而在认知功能障碍的人群中较低。这项研究调查了脑源性神经营养因子是否介导或改变了久坐时间与中年人核磁共振成像估计的脑容量之间的关系。方法基线(n = 612)和5年随访(n = 418)数据来自青年人脑MRI多中心冠状动脉风险发展亚研究,包括黑人和白人参与者(年龄50.3岁,51.6%女性,38.6%黑人)。久坐时间(每天小时数)分为低≤4.3(参考)和高> 8.4的四分位数。该研究的结果包括基线时的脑总量、白质、灰质、海马体积和白质分数各向异性,以及与基线相比的5年变化百分比。本研究采用一般线性回归模型来检验脑源性神经营养因子(自然对数转换)在久坐时间与脑预后之间的中介和调节作用。作者根据年龄、性别、种族、颅内容积、教育程度和血管因素调整了回归模型。横断面上,久坐时间最长的基线参与者的总脑容量较低(- 12.2 cc;95%CI:−20.7,−3.7),灰质(−7.8 cc;95%CI:−14.3,−1.3),海马体积(−0.2 cc;95%CI:−0.3,0.0),与久坐时间最少的人群相比。脑源性神经营养因子水平并没有调节大脑测量和久坐时间之间的关联。研究发现,脑源性神经营养因子对久坐时间与脑和白质总量之间的关系起调节作用,久坐时间长和久坐时间短之间的脑容量差异随着脑源性神经营养因子水平的增加而减小。纵向上,较高的基线脑源性神经营养因子水平与较小的脑容量下降相关。久坐时间对纵向关联没有影响,脑源性神经营养因子也没有调节或缓和久坐时间对大脑测量变化的关联。结论较高的脑源性神经营养因子水平可以缓冲久坐时间对大脑的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sedentary behavior, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and brain structure in midlife: A longitudinal brain MRI sub-study of the coronary artery risk development in young adults study
Background Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels are higher in those who are physically active and lower in people with cognitive dysfunction. This study investigated whether brain-derived neurotrophic factor mediated or modified the association of sedentary time to MRI-estimated brain volumes in midlife. Methods Baseline (n = 612) and five-year follow-up (n = 418) data were drawn from the multicenter Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Brain MRI sub-study, including Black and White participants (aged 50.3 years, 51.6% females, 38.6% Black). Sedentary time (hours per day) was categorized into quartiles with low ≤ 4.3 (reference) and high > 8.4. Outcomes of the study were total brain, white matter, gray matter, hippocampal volumes, and white matter fractional anisotropy at baseline and 5-year percent change from baseline. The study used general linear regression models to examine the mediation and moderation effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (natural log transformed) on the associations of sedentary time to brain outcomes. The authors adjusted the regression model for age, sex, race, intracranial volume, education, and vascular factors. Results Cross-sectionally, baseline participants with the highest sedentary time had a lower total brain (−12.2 cc; 95%CI: −20.7, −3.7), gray matter (−7.8 cc; 95%CI: −14.3, −1.3), and hippocampal volume (−0.2 cc; 95%CI: −0.3, 0.0) compared with populations with the lowest sedentary time. The brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels did not mediate the associations between brain measures and sedentary time. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor was found to moderate associations of sedentary time to total brain and white matter volume such that the brain volume difference between high and low sedentary time decreased as brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels increased. Longitudinally, higher baseline brain-derived neurotrophic factor level was associated with less brain volume decline. The longitudinal associations did not differ by sedentary time, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor did not mediate or moderate the association of sedentary time to brain measure changes. Conclusions Higher brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels may buffer the negative effects of sedentary time on the brain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信