{"title":"安全相关汽车控制系统冗余结构的比较","authors":"J. Guldner, Irina Theis","doi":"10.23919/ECC.1999.7099754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses a methodology for calculating the probability of a redundant system to fail in a specified time interval after a first fault has occurred. Four different redundant system configurations of a safety relevant automotive control system are discussed and compared with respect to their reliability characteristics. The four configurations differ in system topologies as well as the intelligence of the system components for self-monitoring.","PeriodicalId":117668,"journal":{"name":"1999 European Control Conference (ECC)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of redundancy structures for safety relevant automotive control systems\",\"authors\":\"J. Guldner, Irina Theis\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/ECC.1999.7099754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses a methodology for calculating the probability of a redundant system to fail in a specified time interval after a first fault has occurred. Four different redundant system configurations of a safety relevant automotive control system are discussed and compared with respect to their reliability characteristics. The four configurations differ in system topologies as well as the intelligence of the system components for self-monitoring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1999 European Control Conference (ECC)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1999 European Control Conference (ECC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.1999.7099754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1999 European Control Conference (ECC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.1999.7099754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of redundancy structures for safety relevant automotive control systems
This paper discusses a methodology for calculating the probability of a redundant system to fail in a specified time interval after a first fault has occurred. Four different redundant system configurations of a safety relevant automotive control system are discussed and compared with respect to their reliability characteristics. The four configurations differ in system topologies as well as the intelligence of the system components for self-monitoring.