安全相关汽车控制系统冗余结构的比较

J. Guldner, Irina Theis
{"title":"安全相关汽车控制系统冗余结构的比较","authors":"J. Guldner, Irina Theis","doi":"10.23919/ECC.1999.7099754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses a methodology for calculating the probability of a redundant system to fail in a specified time interval after a first fault has occurred. Four different redundant system configurations of a safety relevant automotive control system are discussed and compared with respect to their reliability characteristics. The four configurations differ in system topologies as well as the intelligence of the system components for self-monitoring.","PeriodicalId":117668,"journal":{"name":"1999 European Control Conference (ECC)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of redundancy structures for safety relevant automotive control systems\",\"authors\":\"J. Guldner, Irina Theis\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/ECC.1999.7099754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses a methodology for calculating the probability of a redundant system to fail in a specified time interval after a first fault has occurred. Four different redundant system configurations of a safety relevant automotive control system are discussed and compared with respect to their reliability characteristics. The four configurations differ in system topologies as well as the intelligence of the system components for self-monitoring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1999 European Control Conference (ECC)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1999 European Control Conference (ECC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.1999.7099754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1999 European Control Conference (ECC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.1999.7099754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文讨论了一种计算冗余系统在第一次故障发生后在指定时间间隔内失效概率的方法。讨论了与安全相关的汽车控制系统的四种不同冗余系统配置,并对其可靠性特性进行了比较。这四种配置在系统拓扑和用于自我监控的系统组件的智能方面有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of redundancy structures for safety relevant automotive control systems
This paper discusses a methodology for calculating the probability of a redundant system to fail in a specified time interval after a first fault has occurred. Four different redundant system configurations of a safety relevant automotive control system are discussed and compared with respect to their reliability characteristics. The four configurations differ in system topologies as well as the intelligence of the system components for self-monitoring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信