1996年《通信规范法》:对高校的影响

ACM Siguccs Newsletter Pub Date : 1996-06-01 DOI:10.1145/240831.240833

Brent G. Paterson, Rodney Peterson

{"title":"1996年《通信规范法》:对高校的影响","authors":"Brent G. Paterson, Rodney Peterson","doi":"10.1145/240831.240833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Just mentioning the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) sends shivers through the spines of campus computer system managers and judicial officers alike. Most troublesome is the determination of what qualifies as \"decent\" and to what extent colleges and universities should protect students under 18 and other minors from accessing certain areas of the Internet and campus computer networks that contain adult material.","PeriodicalId":168438,"journal":{"name":"ACM Siguccs Newsletter","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Communications Decency Act of 1996: implications for colleges and universities\",\"authors\":\"Brent G. Paterson, Rodney Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/240831.240833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Just mentioning the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) sends shivers through the spines of campus computer system managers and judicial officers alike. Most troublesome is the determination of what qualifies as \\\"decent\\\" and to what extent colleges and universities should protect students under 18 and other minors from accessing certain areas of the Internet and campus computer networks that contain adult material.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Siguccs Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Siguccs Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/240831.240833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Siguccs Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/240831.240833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

只要一提到1996年的《通信规范法案》(CDA)，校园计算机系统管理人员和司法官员就会不寒而栗。最棘手的问题是确定什么是“体面”，以及高校应该在多大程度上保护18岁以下的学生和其他未成年人不访问包含成人内容的互联网和校园计算机网络的某些区域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Communications Decency Act of 1996: implications for colleges and universities

Just mentioning the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) sends shivers through the spines of campus computer system managers and judicial officers alike. Most troublesome is the determination of what qualifies as "decent" and to what extent colleges and universities should protect students under 18 and other minors from accessing certain areas of the Internet and campus computer networks that contain adult material.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACM Siguccs Newsletter

自引率

0.00%

发文量