{"title":"经验模态分解与离散小波变换作为听觉脑干响应去噪方法的比较分析","authors":"Allen Lois Lanuza, Roxanne De Leon, C. R. Lucas","doi":"10.1109/ICCSCE54767.2022.9935643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peak latency measurement of the patient's Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) essential wave components (Waves I-V) is the usual method in hearing screening to determine the likelihood of hearing impairment. To visualize the peaks of Waves I-V, averaging about 2000 ABR sweeps is necessary for reducing the background noise caused by power line interference and myogenic activity; however, this method is time-consuming and inconvenient for patients and healthcare workers. The study aims to use signal denoising methods to denoise ABRs averaged with fewer sweeps without affecting their functionality. Two deterministic signal denoising approaches, Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), were evaluated and compared to determine which could produce functional denoised ABRs using fewer sweeps. For the 1 kHz stimulus frequency, DWT produced functional ABRs with fewer sweeps than EMD for stimulus intensities of 75, 65, 55 and 50 dB peSPL. For the 4 kHz stimulus frequency, only the DWT method could produce functional ABRs with fewer sweeps. DWT method performs better than EMD in producing clinically relevant denoised ABR for most stimulus descriptions. The findings can help audiologists use the DWT denoising approach when averaging noisy ABRs with fewer sweeps to address the problems caused by the time-consuming conventional averaging method.","PeriodicalId":346014,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 12th International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)","volume":"272 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Empirical Mode Decomposition and Discrete Wavelet Transform as Denoising Methods for Auditory Brainstem Response\",\"authors\":\"Allen Lois Lanuza, Roxanne De Leon, C. R. Lucas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCSCE54767.2022.9935643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peak latency measurement of the patient's Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) essential wave components (Waves I-V) is the usual method in hearing screening to determine the likelihood of hearing impairment. To visualize the peaks of Waves I-V, averaging about 2000 ABR sweeps is necessary for reducing the background noise caused by power line interference and myogenic activity; however, this method is time-consuming and inconvenient for patients and healthcare workers. The study aims to use signal denoising methods to denoise ABRs averaged with fewer sweeps without affecting their functionality. Two deterministic signal denoising approaches, Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), were evaluated and compared to determine which could produce functional denoised ABRs using fewer sweeps. For the 1 kHz stimulus frequency, DWT produced functional ABRs with fewer sweeps than EMD for stimulus intensities of 75, 65, 55 and 50 dB peSPL. For the 4 kHz stimulus frequency, only the DWT method could produce functional ABRs with fewer sweeps. DWT method performs better than EMD in producing clinically relevant denoised ABR for most stimulus descriptions. The findings can help audiologists use the DWT denoising approach when averaging noisy ABRs with fewer sweeps to address the problems caused by the time-consuming conventional averaging method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 12th International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)\",\"volume\":\"272 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 12th International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSCE54767.2022.9935643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 12th International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSCE54767.2022.9935643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
听觉脑干反应(ABR)基本波分量(波I-V)的峰值潜伏期测量是听力筛查中确定听力障碍可能性的常用方法。为了可视化波I-V的峰值,平均约2000 ABR扫描是必要的,以减少由电力线干扰和肌生成活动引起的背景噪声;然而,这种方法耗时长,对患者和医护人员不方便。本研究旨在利用信号去噪方法,在不影响abr功能的情况下,对扫描次数较少的平均abr进行去噪。对两种确定性信号去噪方法——经验模态分解(EMD)和离散小波变换(DWT)进行了评估和比较,以确定哪种方法可以使用更少的扫描产生功能去噪的abr。对于1 kHz的刺激频率,在75、65、55和50 dB peSPL的刺激强度下,DWT产生的功能性abr比EMD产生的扫描次数少。对于4 kHz的刺激频率,只有DWT方法可以产生较少扫描次数的功能性abr。对于大多数刺激描述,DWT方法在产生与临床相关的去噪ABR方面优于EMD方法。该研究结果可以帮助听力学家使用DWT去噪方法,以较少的扫描次数平均有噪声的abr,以解决耗时的传统平均方法所带来的问题。
Comparative Analysis of Empirical Mode Decomposition and Discrete Wavelet Transform as Denoising Methods for Auditory Brainstem Response
Peak latency measurement of the patient's Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) essential wave components (Waves I-V) is the usual method in hearing screening to determine the likelihood of hearing impairment. To visualize the peaks of Waves I-V, averaging about 2000 ABR sweeps is necessary for reducing the background noise caused by power line interference and myogenic activity; however, this method is time-consuming and inconvenient for patients and healthcare workers. The study aims to use signal denoising methods to denoise ABRs averaged with fewer sweeps without affecting their functionality. Two deterministic signal denoising approaches, Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), were evaluated and compared to determine which could produce functional denoised ABRs using fewer sweeps. For the 1 kHz stimulus frequency, DWT produced functional ABRs with fewer sweeps than EMD for stimulus intensities of 75, 65, 55 and 50 dB peSPL. For the 4 kHz stimulus frequency, only the DWT method could produce functional ABRs with fewer sweeps. DWT method performs better than EMD in producing clinically relevant denoised ABR for most stimulus descriptions. The findings can help audiologists use the DWT denoising approach when averaging noisy ABRs with fewer sweeps to address the problems caused by the time-consuming conventional averaging method.