古典就业理论的若干要素与凯恩斯主义视角

Primera Argoti, George Samuleson
{"title":"古典就业理论的若干要素与凯恩斯主义视角","authors":"Primera Argoti, George Samuleson","doi":"10.54783/endlessjournal.v5i2.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental aim of this paper is to lay out essential elements concerning classical economic theory about employment, and compare them with the Keynesian approach. In other words, this document shows a comparative-contrasting study of the classical and more modern theoretical claims, concerning employment. Since employment is a crucial variable related to economic growth and development, this paper is focused on a revision of conceptual issues concerning such a critical indicator. The approach presented here is important not only for professional economists but also for other social scientists. One of the major conclusions of this study is referred to the evidence that the Keynesian “General Theory” is not precisely the most completed and updated theoretical approach to solve problems of employment, but it has a particular richness in its contents that is important to rescue; in fact that theory was extremely useful to undertake unemployment and economic growth problems during the Great Recession in the United States.","PeriodicalId":142050,"journal":{"name":"ENDLESS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE STUDIES","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Elements About the Classical Employment Theory and the Keynesian Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Primera Argoti, George Samuleson\",\"doi\":\"10.54783/endlessjournal.v5i2.86\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fundamental aim of this paper is to lay out essential elements concerning classical economic theory about employment, and compare them with the Keynesian approach. In other words, this document shows a comparative-contrasting study of the classical and more modern theoretical claims, concerning employment. Since employment is a crucial variable related to economic growth and development, this paper is focused on a revision of conceptual issues concerning such a critical indicator. The approach presented here is important not only for professional economists but also for other social scientists. One of the major conclusions of this study is referred to the evidence that the Keynesian “General Theory” is not precisely the most completed and updated theoretical approach to solve problems of employment, but it has a particular richness in its contents that is important to rescue; in fact that theory was extremely useful to undertake unemployment and economic growth problems during the Great Recession in the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENDLESS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENDLESS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54783/endlessjournal.v5i2.86\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENDLESS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54783/endlessjournal.v5i2.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的基本目的是阐述经典经济就业理论的基本要素,并将其与凯恩斯方法进行比较。换句话说,这份文件展示了一个关于就业的古典和现代理论主张的比较对比研究。由于就业是与经济增长和发展有关的一个关键变量,本文的重点是修订有关这一关键指标的概念问题。这里提出的方法不仅对专业经济学家很重要,对其他社会科学家也很重要。本研究的一个主要结论是,有证据表明,凯恩斯主义的“通论”并不是解决就业问题最完整和最新的理论方法,但它的内容特别丰富,对拯救就业问题很重要;事实上,这一理论对于研究美国大衰退期间的失业和经济增长问题极为有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some Elements About the Classical Employment Theory and the Keynesian Perspective
The fundamental aim of this paper is to lay out essential elements concerning classical economic theory about employment, and compare them with the Keynesian approach. In other words, this document shows a comparative-contrasting study of the classical and more modern theoretical claims, concerning employment. Since employment is a crucial variable related to economic growth and development, this paper is focused on a revision of conceptual issues concerning such a critical indicator. The approach presented here is important not only for professional economists but also for other social scientists. One of the major conclusions of this study is referred to the evidence that the Keynesian “General Theory” is not precisely the most completed and updated theoretical approach to solve problems of employment, but it has a particular richness in its contents that is important to rescue; in fact that theory was extremely useful to undertake unemployment and economic growth problems during the Great Recession in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信