德国基本法规定的海外军事行动

A. Peters
{"title":"德国基本法规定的海外军事行动","authors":"A. Peters","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190653330.013.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The German regime on the use of military force is unique for its dense legalization and concomitant complexity, and provides an important reference point for legal comparison. The constitution of 1949 (the Basic Law) allows the deployment of the military abroad for purposes of defense only and within the framework of a system of collective security. Under the latter heading, the German army since the 1990s has contributed to numerous collective military operations. The contours of the constitutional regime are judge-made and based, so far, on four lead judgments. In the seminal judgment of 1994, the Constitutional Court identified a constitution-based requirement for each military deployment to have parliamentary approval. The formalities of the involvement of the Bundestag were, in 2005, codified in a statute. Recent German participation in coalitions of the willing against pirates and terrorists have raised the question whether such operations are still covered by the constitutional bases, and participation in anti-Islamic State action in Syria is currently under review by the Constitutional Court. The Chapter concludes that the tension between the need to effectively integrate military forces into multinational operations, democratic accountability, and judicial oversight has been uniquely resolved in the German constitution and statutory and case law. It illustrates the feasibility of upholding standards of democracy and the rule of law in foreign and military affairs.","PeriodicalId":237106,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Military Operations Abroad Under the German Basic Law\",\"authors\":\"A. Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190653330.013.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The German regime on the use of military force is unique for its dense legalization and concomitant complexity, and provides an important reference point for legal comparison. The constitution of 1949 (the Basic Law) allows the deployment of the military abroad for purposes of defense only and within the framework of a system of collective security. Under the latter heading, the German army since the 1990s has contributed to numerous collective military operations. The contours of the constitutional regime are judge-made and based, so far, on four lead judgments. In the seminal judgment of 1994, the Constitutional Court identified a constitution-based requirement for each military deployment to have parliamentary approval. The formalities of the involvement of the Bundestag were, in 2005, codified in a statute. Recent German participation in coalitions of the willing against pirates and terrorists have raised the question whether such operations are still covered by the constitutional bases, and participation in anti-Islamic State action in Syria is currently under review by the Constitutional Court. The Chapter concludes that the tension between the need to effectively integrate military forces into multinational operations, democratic accountability, and judicial oversight has been uniquely resolved in the German constitution and statutory and case law. It illustrates the feasibility of upholding standards of democracy and the rule of law in foreign and military affairs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190653330.013.44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190653330.013.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国使用军事力量的制度以其密集的法制化和随之而来的复杂性而独具特色,为法律比较提供了一个重要的参考点。1949年的宪法(《基本法》)允许在集体安全体系的框架内,仅以防御为目的在国外部署军队。在后一个标题下,德国军队自20世纪90年代以来为许多集体军事行动做出了贡献。到目前为止,宪法制度的轮廓是由法官制定的,并以四个主要判决为基础。在1994年的开创性判决中,宪法法院确定了一项基于宪法的要求,即每次军事部署都必须得到议会的批准。2005年,联邦议院参与的手续被写入了法规。德国最近参与的打击海盗和恐怖分子的自愿联盟引发了这样一个问题,即此类行动是否仍受宪法基础的保护,而参与叙利亚的反伊斯兰国行动目前正在接受宪法法院的审查。本章的结论是,德国宪法、成文法和判例法独特地解决了有效地将军事力量纳入多国行动的需要、民主问责制和司法监督之间的紧张关系。它说明了在外交和军事事务中坚持民主和法治标准的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Military Operations Abroad Under the German Basic Law
The German regime on the use of military force is unique for its dense legalization and concomitant complexity, and provides an important reference point for legal comparison. The constitution of 1949 (the Basic Law) allows the deployment of the military abroad for purposes of defense only and within the framework of a system of collective security. Under the latter heading, the German army since the 1990s has contributed to numerous collective military operations. The contours of the constitutional regime are judge-made and based, so far, on four lead judgments. In the seminal judgment of 1994, the Constitutional Court identified a constitution-based requirement for each military deployment to have parliamentary approval. The formalities of the involvement of the Bundestag were, in 2005, codified in a statute. Recent German participation in coalitions of the willing against pirates and terrorists have raised the question whether such operations are still covered by the constitutional bases, and participation in anti-Islamic State action in Syria is currently under review by the Constitutional Court. The Chapter concludes that the tension between the need to effectively integrate military forces into multinational operations, democratic accountability, and judicial oversight has been uniquely resolved in the German constitution and statutory and case law. It illustrates the feasibility of upholding standards of democracy and the rule of law in foreign and military affairs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信