土地租赁阻碍粮食生产吗?来自中国8个省份的证据

Tongwei Qiu, Qinying He, Shangpu Li, Biliang Luo
{"title":"土地租赁阻碍粮食生产吗?来自中国8个省份的证据","authors":"Tongwei Qiu, Qinying He, Shangpu Li, Biliang Luo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3274058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China’s food security has increasingly been one worldwide concern. And, most researchers argue that land transfer further aggravates the problem of non-grain in rural China. We theoretically pursue the the internal mechanism of the effects of land rental on the grain production and then employ 2,088 household survey data collected in China to assess their relationship. The estimated results indicate that land rental positively affects grain production, especially with the decrease of agricultural labor. Contrarily, land rental has significantly negative impact on grain production with the increase of agricultural labor. Besides, we also find that the reason that land rental stimulates grain production is that the grain production can be more easily mechanized than that of cash crops in rural China, which is conductive to reducing the high labor cost in agriculture and encouraging off-farm employment. Thus, when considering the development of mechanization in grain production and high labor cost in agriculture, grain production has been the voluntary choice of the land leaseholders, and this undoubtedly ensures China’s grain security.","PeriodicalId":365767,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability & Economics eJournal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Land Rental Impede Grain Production? Evidence from 8 Provinces in China\",\"authors\":\"Tongwei Qiu, Qinying He, Shangpu Li, Biliang Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3274058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"China’s food security has increasingly been one worldwide concern. And, most researchers argue that land transfer further aggravates the problem of non-grain in rural China. We theoretically pursue the the internal mechanism of the effects of land rental on the grain production and then employ 2,088 household survey data collected in China to assess their relationship. The estimated results indicate that land rental positively affects grain production, especially with the decrease of agricultural labor. Contrarily, land rental has significantly negative impact on grain production with the increase of agricultural labor. Besides, we also find that the reason that land rental stimulates grain production is that the grain production can be more easily mechanized than that of cash crops in rural China, which is conductive to reducing the high labor cost in agriculture and encouraging off-farm employment. Thus, when considering the development of mechanization in grain production and high labor cost in agriculture, grain production has been the voluntary choice of the land leaseholders, and this undoubtedly ensures China’s grain security.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainability & Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainability & Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3274058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability & Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3274058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国的粮食安全日益成为世界关注的焦点。大多数研究者认为,土地流转进一步加剧了中国农村的非粮食问题。本文从理论上探讨了土地租赁对粮食生产影响的内在机制,并利用在中国收集的2088个农户调查数据来评估二者之间的关系。估算结果表明,土地租金对粮食生产有正向影响,特别是随着农业劳动力的减少。相反,随着农业劳动力的增加,土地租赁对粮食生产的影响呈显著负向。此外,我们还发现土地租赁刺激粮食生产的原因是中国农村粮食生产比经济作物生产更容易机械化,这有利于降低农业高劳动力成本,鼓励非农就业。因此,考虑到粮食生产机械化的发展和农业较高的劳动力成本,粮食生产已经成为土地承租人的自愿选择,这无疑保证了中国的粮食安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Land Rental Impede Grain Production? Evidence from 8 Provinces in China
China’s food security has increasingly been one worldwide concern. And, most researchers argue that land transfer further aggravates the problem of non-grain in rural China. We theoretically pursue the the internal mechanism of the effects of land rental on the grain production and then employ 2,088 household survey data collected in China to assess their relationship. The estimated results indicate that land rental positively affects grain production, especially with the decrease of agricultural labor. Contrarily, land rental has significantly negative impact on grain production with the increase of agricultural labor. Besides, we also find that the reason that land rental stimulates grain production is that the grain production can be more easily mechanized than that of cash crops in rural China, which is conductive to reducing the high labor cost in agriculture and encouraging off-farm employment. Thus, when considering the development of mechanization in grain production and high labor cost in agriculture, grain production has been the voluntary choice of the land leaseholders, and this undoubtedly ensures China’s grain security.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信