优先考虑患者安全工作在办公室实践设置。

S. Kravet, Melissa Bhatnagar, M. Dwyer, K. Kjaer, J. Evanko, Hardeep Singh
{"title":"优先考虑患者安全工作在办公室实践设置。","authors":"S. Kravet, Melissa Bhatnagar, M. Dwyer, K. Kjaer, J. Evanko, Hardeep Singh","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000000652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nOutpatient care settings face unique risks of adverse events and medico-legal liability, often worsened by inconsistent processes and fragmented care. Health systems are increasingly providing integrated care that includes outpatient care, but models of how to systematically target medico-legal risk in office practices are largely absent. Innovative and scalable efforts are needed to guide large health systems in their approach to outpatient safety.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA malpractice consortium consisting of five large health care delivery systems identified that its ambulatory care cases (including office practices, outpatient hospital settings, and emergency departments) account for 30% to 35% of annual medical malpractice costs, and missed or delayed diagnoses account for approximately 50% of office practice liability risk. To further understand risks and opportunities in office-based practices, a team of patient safety and loss prevention professionals conducted site visits to seven outpatient-affiliated sites of the five health systems from January to March 2016 and interviewed several key informant members of physician, nursing, and administrative leadership.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe identified eight common patient safety risk domains based on analysis of eight sets of group interviews. Risk domains were then prioritized by members of the consortium leadership using scoring criteria that we developed based on existing risk assessment and prioritization approaches. The method helped identify communication and follow-up of diagnostic test results in the outpatient setting as the single most important risk area to target improvement efforts.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nA targeted approach to identify a single high-risk area led to development of dedicated teams to conduct local patient safety improvement projects at the affiliated health systems and for sharing lessons learned. Similar efforts elsewhere could lead to safety improvements in office practices at other large health systems.","PeriodicalId":206245,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Patient Safety","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing Patient Safety Efforts in Office Practice Settings.\",\"authors\":\"S. Kravet, Melissa Bhatnagar, M. Dwyer, K. Kjaer, J. Evanko, Hardeep Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000000652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\nOutpatient care settings face unique risks of adverse events and medico-legal liability, often worsened by inconsistent processes and fragmented care. Health systems are increasingly providing integrated care that includes outpatient care, but models of how to systematically target medico-legal risk in office practices are largely absent. Innovative and scalable efforts are needed to guide large health systems in their approach to outpatient safety.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA malpractice consortium consisting of five large health care delivery systems identified that its ambulatory care cases (including office practices, outpatient hospital settings, and emergency departments) account for 30% to 35% of annual medical malpractice costs, and missed or delayed diagnoses account for approximately 50% of office practice liability risk. To further understand risks and opportunities in office-based practices, a team of patient safety and loss prevention professionals conducted site visits to seven outpatient-affiliated sites of the five health systems from January to March 2016 and interviewed several key informant members of physician, nursing, and administrative leadership.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWe identified eight common patient safety risk domains based on analysis of eight sets of group interviews. Risk domains were then prioritized by members of the consortium leadership using scoring criteria that we developed based on existing risk assessment and prioritization approaches. The method helped identify communication and follow-up of diagnostic test results in the outpatient setting as the single most important risk area to target improvement efforts.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nA targeted approach to identify a single high-risk area led to development of dedicated teams to conduct local patient safety improvement projects at the affiliated health systems and for sharing lessons learned. Similar efforts elsewhere could lead to safety improvements in office practices at other large health systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的门诊护理机构面临着独特的不良事件和医疗法律责任风险,往往因不一致的流程和碎片化的护理而恶化。卫生系统越来越多地提供包括门诊在内的综合护理,但如何系统地针对办公室实践中的医疗法律风险的模型在很大程度上是缺失的。需要创新和可扩展的努力来指导大型卫生系统采取门诊安全措施。方法一个由5个大型医疗服务系统组成的医疗事故联盟发现,其门诊病例(包括门诊、医院门诊和急诊科)占年度医疗事故成本的30%至35%,漏诊或延迟诊断约占办公室执业责任风险的50%。为了进一步了解办公室实践的风险和机遇,一个由患者安全和损失预防专业人员组成的团队于2016年1月至3月对五个卫生系统的七个门诊附属站点进行了实地考察,并采访了医生、护理和行政领导的几位关键线人。结果通过对8组小组访谈的分析,我们确定了8个常见的患者安全风险域。然后由联盟领导的成员使用我们基于现有风险评估和优先排序方法开发的评分标准对风险领域进行优先排序。该方法有助于确定沟通和随访诊断测试结果在门诊设置为目标改进工作的最重要的风险领域。结论:通过有针对性的方法确定单一高风险区域,建立了专门的团队,在附属卫生系统开展当地患者安全改善项目,并分享经验教训。其他地方的类似努力可能会导致其他大型医疗系统的办公室安全措施得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritizing Patient Safety Efforts in Office Practice Settings.
OBJECTIVES Outpatient care settings face unique risks of adverse events and medico-legal liability, often worsened by inconsistent processes and fragmented care. Health systems are increasingly providing integrated care that includes outpatient care, but models of how to systematically target medico-legal risk in office practices are largely absent. Innovative and scalable efforts are needed to guide large health systems in their approach to outpatient safety. METHODS A malpractice consortium consisting of five large health care delivery systems identified that its ambulatory care cases (including office practices, outpatient hospital settings, and emergency departments) account for 30% to 35% of annual medical malpractice costs, and missed or delayed diagnoses account for approximately 50% of office practice liability risk. To further understand risks and opportunities in office-based practices, a team of patient safety and loss prevention professionals conducted site visits to seven outpatient-affiliated sites of the five health systems from January to March 2016 and interviewed several key informant members of physician, nursing, and administrative leadership. RESULTS We identified eight common patient safety risk domains based on analysis of eight sets of group interviews. Risk domains were then prioritized by members of the consortium leadership using scoring criteria that we developed based on existing risk assessment and prioritization approaches. The method helped identify communication and follow-up of diagnostic test results in the outpatient setting as the single most important risk area to target improvement efforts. CONCLUSIONS A targeted approach to identify a single high-risk area led to development of dedicated teams to conduct local patient safety improvement projects at the affiliated health systems and for sharing lessons learned. Similar efforts elsewhere could lead to safety improvements in office practices at other large health systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信