学习风格的概念框架。对于学生在初始培训教师化学概念- [framework of learning styles。化学教师初级培训学生的案例]

Michal Elías Godoy, Flavio Zamorano Pontiggia, Javiera Pérez Cáceres, Marijana Tomljenovic Niksic, Elisa Zúñiga Garay
{"title":"学习风格的概念框架。对于学生在初始培训教师化学概念- [framework of learning styles。化学教师初级培训学生的案例]","authors":"Michal Elías Godoy, Flavio Zamorano Pontiggia, Javiera Pérez Cáceres, Marijana Tomljenovic Niksic, Elisa Zúñiga Garay","doi":"10.26754/cinaic.2021.0111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- Knowing student’s preference in how to learn would allow them to use motivating educational means and contribute to development of competencies committed in their Graduate Profile. The objective of this work is to determine the Learning Styles (LS) that students in Chemistry Teacher training declare. A conceptual framework to AE was developed through a bibliographic review following by the criteria of Correlation, Contemporaneity Substantiality. A conceptual framework is presented with a historical and dialogical evaluation of great contributions (Aristotle, Vygotsky, Piaget, Kolb, Fleming, and Gardner). The determination of LS was carried out from a mixed paradigm, with a systematic design around a quasi-experimental methodology, with a naturally constituted groups of students (cohorts 2020 y 2021), applying the Honey-Alonso Learning Styles Questionnaire. The responses to the questionnaire showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient between 0.8 and 0.9) and a mean variance between 0.7 and 0.1. A mostly Assimilatory profile is exhibited, then Divergent and Accommodator type, in addition to showing between 20% and 10% of preferences with mixed profiles, in all cases they were not observed gender differences.","PeriodicalId":369305,"journal":{"name":"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marco conceptual de los Estilos de Aprendizaje. El caso de los estudiantes en formación inicial de profesores de química - [Conceptual framework of learning styles. The case of students in initial training of chemistry teachers]\",\"authors\":\"Michal Elías Godoy, Flavio Zamorano Pontiggia, Javiera Pérez Cáceres, Marijana Tomljenovic Niksic, Elisa Zúñiga Garay\",\"doi\":\"10.26754/cinaic.2021.0111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"- Knowing student’s preference in how to learn would allow them to use motivating educational means and contribute to development of competencies committed in their Graduate Profile. The objective of this work is to determine the Learning Styles (LS) that students in Chemistry Teacher training declare. A conceptual framework to AE was developed through a bibliographic review following by the criteria of Correlation, Contemporaneity Substantiality. A conceptual framework is presented with a historical and dialogical evaluation of great contributions (Aristotle, Vygotsky, Piaget, Kolb, Fleming, and Gardner). The determination of LS was carried out from a mixed paradigm, with a systematic design around a quasi-experimental methodology, with a naturally constituted groups of students (cohorts 2020 y 2021), applying the Honey-Alonso Learning Styles Questionnaire. The responses to the questionnaire showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient between 0.8 and 0.9) and a mean variance between 0.7 and 0.1. A mostly Assimilatory profile is exhibited, then Divergent and Accommodator type, in addition to showing between 20% and 10% of preferences with mixed profiles, in all cases they were not observed gender differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26754/cinaic.2021.0111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26754/cinaic.2021.0111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

-了解学生对学习方式的偏好将使他们能够使用激励的教育手段,并有助于培养他们在研究生档案中承诺的能力。本研究的目的是确定化学教师培训学生的学习风格(LS)。AE的概念框架是通过参考文献回顾,按照相关性、时代性、实质性的标准发展起来的。一个概念框架提出了历史和对话评价的伟大贡献(亚里士多德,维果茨基,皮亚杰,科尔布,弗莱明和加德纳)。LS的确定采用混合范式,围绕准实验方法进行系统设计,使用Honey-Alonso学习风格问卷,对自然组成的学生群体(2020 - 2021队列)进行研究。问卷结果具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α系数在0.8 ~ 0.9之间),平均方差在0.7 ~ 0.1之间。在所有的情况下,他们都没有观察到性别差异,除了显示出20%到10%的混合偏好外,主要表现为同化型,然后是发散型和迁就型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marco conceptual de los Estilos de Aprendizaje. El caso de los estudiantes en formación inicial de profesores de química - [Conceptual framework of learning styles. The case of students in initial training of chemistry teachers]
- Knowing student’s preference in how to learn would allow them to use motivating educational means and contribute to development of competencies committed in their Graduate Profile. The objective of this work is to determine the Learning Styles (LS) that students in Chemistry Teacher training declare. A conceptual framework to AE was developed through a bibliographic review following by the criteria of Correlation, Contemporaneity Substantiality. A conceptual framework is presented with a historical and dialogical evaluation of great contributions (Aristotle, Vygotsky, Piaget, Kolb, Fleming, and Gardner). The determination of LS was carried out from a mixed paradigm, with a systematic design around a quasi-experimental methodology, with a naturally constituted groups of students (cohorts 2020 y 2021), applying the Honey-Alonso Learning Styles Questionnaire. The responses to the questionnaire showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient between 0.8 and 0.9) and a mean variance between 0.7 and 0.1. A mostly Assimilatory profile is exhibited, then Divergent and Accommodator type, in addition to showing between 20% and 10% of preferences with mixed profiles, in all cases they were not observed gender differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信