地理空间数据库中的关键字搜索

Kavita V. V. Ganeshan, N. L. Sarda, Sanchit Gupta
{"title":"地理空间数据库中的关键字搜索","authors":"Kavita V. V. Ganeshan, N. L. Sarda, Sanchit Gupta","doi":"10.1145/1869790.1869886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geospatial databases usually contain features of different geometries, associated with thematic attributes. The features have implicit spatial relationships which are not explicitly captured (unless the relationships have their own attributes, which is rare), and hence geospatial databases contain a few or no foreign keys. As geospatial data becomes more widely available and used by people, their keyword based querying will become an important interface. Keyword queries in geospatial data may be related to features and their attributes, or with multiple features, their spatial relationships, and their attributes. The keywords may refer to feature types as well as feature instances (e.g., \"India capital\" - here, capital is really a schema level data, i.e., metadata). We must note that keyword queries are not natural language queries. They just contain keywords that the user thinks characterize their expected result. Consequently, analyzing and disambiguating the keyword queries is important before answering them. Spatial relationships to be taken into account may have to be based and ranked on nearest-neighborhood. Finally, the query results need to be shown both textually as well as visually on a map. These requirements make keyword searching in geospatial data quite different from normal data. This paper describes our approach to supporting keyword queries. We describe query interpretation, query translation into one or more SQL queries, and query execution and result ranking. We describe how geo-spatial ontologies can be used in understanding implicit relationships between query objects, and how R-tree based indexes can be effectively used for result ranking based on spatial relationships.","PeriodicalId":359068,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems","volume":"46 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keyword search in geospatial database\",\"authors\":\"Kavita V. V. Ganeshan, N. L. Sarda, Sanchit Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1869790.1869886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Geospatial databases usually contain features of different geometries, associated with thematic attributes. The features have implicit spatial relationships which are not explicitly captured (unless the relationships have their own attributes, which is rare), and hence geospatial databases contain a few or no foreign keys. As geospatial data becomes more widely available and used by people, their keyword based querying will become an important interface. Keyword queries in geospatial data may be related to features and their attributes, or with multiple features, their spatial relationships, and their attributes. The keywords may refer to feature types as well as feature instances (e.g., \\\"India capital\\\" - here, capital is really a schema level data, i.e., metadata). We must note that keyword queries are not natural language queries. They just contain keywords that the user thinks characterize their expected result. Consequently, analyzing and disambiguating the keyword queries is important before answering them. Spatial relationships to be taken into account may have to be based and ranked on nearest-neighborhood. Finally, the query results need to be shown both textually as well as visually on a map. These requirements make keyword searching in geospatial data quite different from normal data. This paper describes our approach to supporting keyword queries. We describe query interpretation, query translation into one or more SQL queries, and query execution and result ranking. We describe how geo-spatial ontologies can be used in understanding implicit relationships between query objects, and how R-tree based indexes can be effectively used for result ranking based on spatial relationships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"46 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1869790.1869886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1869790.1869886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

地理空间数据库通常包含与主题属性相关的不同几何形状的特征。这些特征具有隐式的空间关系,这些关系没有被显式捕获(除非这些关系有自己的属性,这种情况很少见),因此地理空间数据库包含很少的外键或不包含外键。随着地理空间数据的广泛获取和使用,基于关键字的查询将成为一个重要的接口。地理空间数据中的关键字查询可能与特征及其属性相关,也可能与多个特征及其空间关系和属性相关。关键字可以引用特征类型和特征实例(例如,“India capital”——这里的capital实际上是一个模式级别的数据,也就是元数据)。我们必须注意,关键字查询不是自然语言查询。它们只包含用户认为表征其预期结果的关键字。因此,在回答关键字查询之前,分析和消除歧义是很重要的。要考虑的空间关系可能必须以最近邻居为基础并进行排名。最后,查询结果需要在地图上以文本和视觉两种方式显示。这些要求使得地理空间数据中的关键字搜索与普通数据中的关键字搜索有很大的不同。本文描述了我们支持关键字查询的方法。我们描述了查询解释、查询转换为一个或多个SQL查询、查询执行和结果排序。我们描述了如何使用地理空间本体来理解查询对象之间的隐式关系,以及如何将基于r树的索引有效地用于基于空间关系的结果排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Keyword search in geospatial database
Geospatial databases usually contain features of different geometries, associated with thematic attributes. The features have implicit spatial relationships which are not explicitly captured (unless the relationships have their own attributes, which is rare), and hence geospatial databases contain a few or no foreign keys. As geospatial data becomes more widely available and used by people, their keyword based querying will become an important interface. Keyword queries in geospatial data may be related to features and their attributes, or with multiple features, their spatial relationships, and their attributes. The keywords may refer to feature types as well as feature instances (e.g., "India capital" - here, capital is really a schema level data, i.e., metadata). We must note that keyword queries are not natural language queries. They just contain keywords that the user thinks characterize their expected result. Consequently, analyzing and disambiguating the keyword queries is important before answering them. Spatial relationships to be taken into account may have to be based and ranked on nearest-neighborhood. Finally, the query results need to be shown both textually as well as visually on a map. These requirements make keyword searching in geospatial data quite different from normal data. This paper describes our approach to supporting keyword queries. We describe query interpretation, query translation into one or more SQL queries, and query execution and result ranking. We describe how geo-spatial ontologies can be used in understanding implicit relationships between query objects, and how R-tree based indexes can be effectively used for result ranking based on spatial relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信