加州、巴西和智利的电力危机:给智利市场的教训

D. Watts, R. Ariztía
{"title":"加州、巴西和智利的电力危机:给智利市场的教训","authors":"D. Watts, R. Ariztía","doi":"10.1109/LESCPE.2002.1020659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many countries have deregulated their electricity markets, boosting competition and participation of private enterprises in generation. The recent electricity crises of Chile, California and Brazil, and the problems that other countries have faced, have interrupted the development of these reforms. In this paper the fundamentals of each market are analyzed, as well as each deregulated legislation. The authors also studied the crises, and the influence on them of each legislation. They found that besides circumstantial situations in each case, there are common aspects in the three crises. In all of them they found that the price signals in shortage situations were wrong, and that the performance of the regulators was deficient. They conclude that a deregulated electricity market will not work properly in a scarcity situation if consumers are isolated from the real cost of energy, and if it does not have independent regulators, that are not influenced by short-term political interests. Finally, based on the study, they propose improvements to the Chilean electricity legislation.","PeriodicalId":127699,"journal":{"name":"LESCOPE'02. 2002 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering. Conference Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The electricity crises of California, Brazil and Chile: lessons to the Chilean market\",\"authors\":\"D. Watts, R. Ariztía\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LESCPE.2002.1020659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many countries have deregulated their electricity markets, boosting competition and participation of private enterprises in generation. The recent electricity crises of Chile, California and Brazil, and the problems that other countries have faced, have interrupted the development of these reforms. In this paper the fundamentals of each market are analyzed, as well as each deregulated legislation. The authors also studied the crises, and the influence on them of each legislation. They found that besides circumstantial situations in each case, there are common aspects in the three crises. In all of them they found that the price signals in shortage situations were wrong, and that the performance of the regulators was deficient. They conclude that a deregulated electricity market will not work properly in a scarcity situation if consumers are isolated from the real cost of energy, and if it does not have independent regulators, that are not influenced by short-term political interests. Finally, based on the study, they propose improvements to the Chilean electricity legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LESCOPE'02. 2002 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering. Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LESCOPE'02. 2002 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering. Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LESCPE.2002.1020659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LESCOPE'02. 2002 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering. Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LESCPE.2002.1020659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

许多国家放松了对电力市场的管制,促进了私营企业在发电领域的竞争和参与。最近智利、加利福尼亚和巴西的电力危机,以及其他国家所面临的问题,已经中断了这些改革的发展。本文分析了每个市场的基本原理,以及每个放松管制的立法。作者还研究了危机,以及每项立法对危机的影响。他们发现,除了各自的具体情况外,三次危机还有一些共同之处。在所有这些案例中,他们都发现短缺情况下的价格信号是错误的,监管机构的表现是有缺陷的。他们得出的结论是,如果消费者与能源的实际成本隔绝,如果没有不受短期政治利益影响的独立监管机构,那么放松管制的电力市场将无法在短缺的情况下正常运作。最后,在研究的基础上,他们提出了改进智利电力立法的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The electricity crises of California, Brazil and Chile: lessons to the Chilean market
Many countries have deregulated their electricity markets, boosting competition and participation of private enterprises in generation. The recent electricity crises of Chile, California and Brazil, and the problems that other countries have faced, have interrupted the development of these reforms. In this paper the fundamentals of each market are analyzed, as well as each deregulated legislation. The authors also studied the crises, and the influence on them of each legislation. They found that besides circumstantial situations in each case, there are common aspects in the three crises. In all of them they found that the price signals in shortage situations were wrong, and that the performance of the regulators was deficient. They conclude that a deregulated electricity market will not work properly in a scarcity situation if consumers are isolated from the real cost of energy, and if it does not have independent regulators, that are not influenced by short-term political interests. Finally, based on the study, they propose improvements to the Chilean electricity legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信