{"title":"人工智能可以有个性吗?","authors":"Umarpreet Singh, Parham Aarabhi","doi":"10.1109/CAI54212.2023.00097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we evaluated several large language models (including ChatGPT, GPT3 and LLAMA) by running standardized personality tests on their results. Generally, we found that each large language model has an internal consistent personality. We further found that LLama tends to score more highly on Neuroticism than other models, whereas ChatGPT/GPT3 tends to score more highly on Conscientiousness and Agreeableness.","PeriodicalId":129324,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can AI have a personality?\",\"authors\":\"Umarpreet Singh, Parham Aarabhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CAI54212.2023.00097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we evaluated several large language models (including ChatGPT, GPT3 and LLAMA) by running standardized personality tests on their results. Generally, we found that each large language model has an internal consistent personality. We further found that LLama tends to score more highly on Neuroticism than other models, whereas ChatGPT/GPT3 tends to score more highly on Conscientiousness and Agreeableness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAI54212.2023.00097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAI54212.2023.00097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper, we evaluated several large language models (including ChatGPT, GPT3 and LLAMA) by running standardized personality tests on their results. Generally, we found that each large language model has an internal consistent personality. We further found that LLama tends to score more highly on Neuroticism than other models, whereas ChatGPT/GPT3 tends to score more highly on Conscientiousness and Agreeableness.