{"title":"右翼民族地方主义的思想根源与公民共和主义批判","authors":"Alberto Spektorowski","doi":"10.1177/1743453X0700300208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of regional identities in Europe is a process largely welcomed by liberals and especially applauded by radical democratic and postcolonial theorists. Yet this trend towards post-nation-state identity is not only attractive to democratic and postcolonial theories, but is also an integral part of current neo-fascist ideologies. This article examines the intellectual origins of right-wing ethnoregionalism and the idea of ‘exclusionist multiculturalism” through the works of Pierre Drieu La Rochelle and Alain de Benoist. It also compares the idea of exclusionist ‘regional’ multiculturalism with liberal multiculturalism and defends a democratic, civic republicanism as an alternative to both.","PeriodicalId":381236,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Ethics Review","volume":"29 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ideological Roots of Right-Wing Ethnoregionalism and the Civic Republican Critique\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Spektorowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1743453X0700300208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rise of regional identities in Europe is a process largely welcomed by liberals and especially applauded by radical democratic and postcolonial theorists. Yet this trend towards post-nation-state identity is not only attractive to democratic and postcolonial theories, but is also an integral part of current neo-fascist ideologies. This article examines the intellectual origins of right-wing ethnoregionalism and the idea of ‘exclusionist multiculturalism” through the works of Pierre Drieu La Rochelle and Alain de Benoist. It also compares the idea of exclusionist ‘regional’ multiculturalism with liberal multiculturalism and defends a democratic, civic republicanism as an alternative to both.\",\"PeriodicalId\":381236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics and Ethics Review\",\"volume\":\"29 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics and Ethics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453X0700300208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Ethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453X0700300208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
欧洲地区认同的兴起在很大程度上受到自由主义者的欢迎,尤其是激进民主和后殖民理论家的称赞。然而,这种后民族国家认同的趋势不仅对民主和后殖民理论具有吸引力,而且也是当前新法西斯主义意识形态的一个组成部分。本文通过拉罗谢尔(Pierre Drieu La Rochelle)和贝诺瓦(Alain de Benoist)的作品,考察右翼民族地区主义和“排外主义多元文化主义”思想的思想渊源。它还比较了排外主义的“区域”多元文化主义与自由主义的多元文化主义,并捍卫了民主的、公民的共和主义,作为两者的替代品。
The Ideological Roots of Right-Wing Ethnoregionalism and the Civic Republican Critique
The rise of regional identities in Europe is a process largely welcomed by liberals and especially applauded by radical democratic and postcolonial theorists. Yet this trend towards post-nation-state identity is not only attractive to democratic and postcolonial theories, but is also an integral part of current neo-fascist ideologies. This article examines the intellectual origins of right-wing ethnoregionalism and the idea of ‘exclusionist multiculturalism” through the works of Pierre Drieu La Rochelle and Alain de Benoist. It also compares the idea of exclusionist ‘regional’ multiculturalism with liberal multiculturalism and defends a democratic, civic republicanism as an alternative to both.