{"title":"行为国际贸易法","authors":"G. Dimitropoulos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2799528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes to recast a big part of international trade law as behavioural regulation. The Sanitary and Phytosanitary and Technical Barriers to Trade Agreements of the World Trade Organisation include provisions on disclosure of better information, on legal default rules and on debiasing through law that are similar to the ones proposed in the Behavioural Law and Economics literature to nudge governments towards specific directions. This happens even in the absence of a (centralised) social planner. The article further aims to use behavioural trade regulation to draw some general lessons for Behavioural Law and Economics; most importantly, to show that nudging may have a libertarian rather than a paternalistic result. Finally, the paper proposes that behavioural regulation should be complemented by learning facilities to debias government institutions and lead to social and institutional learning.","PeriodicalId":103245,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","volume":"31 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioural International Trade Law\",\"authors\":\"G. Dimitropoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2799528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article proposes to recast a big part of international trade law as behavioural regulation. The Sanitary and Phytosanitary and Technical Barriers to Trade Agreements of the World Trade Organisation include provisions on disclosure of better information, on legal default rules and on debiasing through law that are similar to the ones proposed in the Behavioural Law and Economics literature to nudge governments towards specific directions. This happens even in the absence of a (centralised) social planner. The article further aims to use behavioural trade regulation to draw some general lessons for Behavioural Law and Economics; most importantly, to show that nudging may have a libertarian rather than a paternalistic result. Finally, the paper proposes that behavioural regulation should be complemented by learning facilities to debias government institutions and lead to social and institutional learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"31 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2799528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2799528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文建议将国际贸易法的很大一部分重新塑造为行为规范。世界贸易组织(wto)的《卫生、植物检疫和技术贸易壁垒协定》(Sanitary and Phytosanitary and Technical Barriers to Trade Agreements)包括了有关披露更好信息、法律违约规则和通过法律消除偏见的条款,这些条款类似于行为法和经济学文献中提出的、旨在推动政府向特定方向发展的条款。即使在没有(集中的)社会计划者的情况下,这种情况也会发生。本文进一步旨在利用行为交易规制为行为法学和经济学提供一些普遍的借鉴;最重要的是,这表明轻推可能会产生自由意志主义而不是家长式的结果。最后,本文提出行为监管应辅以学习设施,以消除政府机构的偏见,并导致社会和制度学习。
This article proposes to recast a big part of international trade law as behavioural regulation. The Sanitary and Phytosanitary and Technical Barriers to Trade Agreements of the World Trade Organisation include provisions on disclosure of better information, on legal default rules and on debiasing through law that are similar to the ones proposed in the Behavioural Law and Economics literature to nudge governments towards specific directions. This happens even in the absence of a (centralised) social planner. The article further aims to use behavioural trade regulation to draw some general lessons for Behavioural Law and Economics; most importantly, to show that nudging may have a libertarian rather than a paternalistic result. Finally, the paper proposes that behavioural regulation should be complemented by learning facilities to debias government institutions and lead to social and institutional learning.