机器学习预测股票收益的承诺和陷阱

E. Leung, Harald Lohre, David Mischlich, Yifei Shea, Maximilian Stroh
{"title":"机器学习预测股票收益的承诺和陷阱","authors":"E. Leung, Harald Lohre, David Mischlich, Yifei Shea, Maximilian Stroh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3546725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research suggests that machine learning models dominate traditional linear models in predicting cross-sectional stock returns. The authors confirm this finding when predicting one-month-forward-looking returns based on a set of common stock characteristics, including predictors such as short-term reversal. Despite the statistical advantage of machine learning model predictions, the authors demonstrate that the economic gains tend to be more limited and critically dependent on the ability to take risk and implement trades efficiently. Unlike traditional models, machine learning models have been somewhat more effective over the past decade at discerning valuable predictions from cross-sectional equity characteristics. TOPICS: Security analysis and valuation, big data/machine learning Key Findings ▪ The authors compare a nonlinear machine learning model called gradient boosting machine (GBM) with traditional linear models in predicting cross-sectional stock returns based on well-known equity characteristics. ▪ They demonstrate how to rationalize the mechanics and outcome of GBM to alleviate its black-box characteristics. ▪ The extent to which the statistical advantage of GBM’s performance over that of linear models can be translated into economic gains depends critically on one’s ability to take risk and implement trades efficiently.","PeriodicalId":199045,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Promises and Pitfalls of Machine Learning for Predicting Stock Returns\",\"authors\":\"E. Leung, Harald Lohre, David Mischlich, Yifei Shea, Maximilian Stroh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3546725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent research suggests that machine learning models dominate traditional linear models in predicting cross-sectional stock returns. The authors confirm this finding when predicting one-month-forward-looking returns based on a set of common stock characteristics, including predictors such as short-term reversal. Despite the statistical advantage of machine learning model predictions, the authors demonstrate that the economic gains tend to be more limited and critically dependent on the ability to take risk and implement trades efficiently. Unlike traditional models, machine learning models have been somewhat more effective over the past decade at discerning valuable predictions from cross-sectional equity characteristics. TOPICS: Security analysis and valuation, big data/machine learning Key Findings ▪ The authors compare a nonlinear machine learning model called gradient boosting machine (GBM) with traditional linear models in predicting cross-sectional stock returns based on well-known equity characteristics. ▪ They demonstrate how to rationalize the mechanics and outcome of GBM to alleviate its black-box characteristics. ▪ The extent to which the statistical advantage of GBM’s performance over that of linear models can be translated into economic gains depends critically on one’s ability to take risk and implement trades efficiently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3546725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3546725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

最近的研究表明,机器学习模型在预测横截面股票收益方面主导了传统的线性模型。在基于一系列普通股特征(包括短期反转等预测因素)预测一个月的前瞻性回报时,作者证实了这一发现。尽管机器学习模型预测具有统计优势,但作者证明,经济收益往往更加有限,并且严重依赖于承担风险和有效实施交易的能力。与传统模型不同,在过去十年中,机器学习模型在从横截面股票特征中识别有价值的预测方面更加有效。作者将一种称为梯度提升机(GBM)的非线性机器学习模型与传统的线性模型进行了比较,以预测基于众所周知的股票特征的横截面股票回报。他们演示了如何合理化GBM的机制和结果,以减轻其黑箱特征。▪GBM相对于线性模型的统计优势在多大程度上可以转化为经济收益,关键取决于一个人承担风险和有效实施交易的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Promises and Pitfalls of Machine Learning for Predicting Stock Returns
Recent research suggests that machine learning models dominate traditional linear models in predicting cross-sectional stock returns. The authors confirm this finding when predicting one-month-forward-looking returns based on a set of common stock characteristics, including predictors such as short-term reversal. Despite the statistical advantage of machine learning model predictions, the authors demonstrate that the economic gains tend to be more limited and critically dependent on the ability to take risk and implement trades efficiently. Unlike traditional models, machine learning models have been somewhat more effective over the past decade at discerning valuable predictions from cross-sectional equity characteristics. TOPICS: Security analysis and valuation, big data/machine learning Key Findings ▪ The authors compare a nonlinear machine learning model called gradient boosting machine (GBM) with traditional linear models in predicting cross-sectional stock returns based on well-known equity characteristics. ▪ They demonstrate how to rationalize the mechanics and outcome of GBM to alleviate its black-box characteristics. ▪ The extent to which the statistical advantage of GBM’s performance over that of linear models can be translated into economic gains depends critically on one’s ability to take risk and implement trades efficiently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信