评估在测试活动中支持技术债务管理的概念框架-可行性研究

Verusca Rocha, Sávio Freire, Manoel G. Mendonça, R. Spínola
{"title":"评估在测试活动中支持技术债务管理的概念框架-可行性研究","authors":"Verusca Rocha, Sávio Freire, Manoel G. Mendonça, R. Spínola","doi":"10.1145/3559744.3559753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Test-related technical debt (TRTD) refers to debt items that affect software testing activities, compromising their quality. Having information on indicators of their presence, causes, effects, and preventive practices can support the management of TRTD items. Although several works have investigated TD indicators, causes, effects, and prevention, there is a need to investigate how to use this information for supporting the management of debt items in the context of testing activities. Aims: This work (i) presents an updated version of a conceptual framework that organizes a set of indicators, causes, effects, and preventive practices of TRTD and (ii) evaluates it with respect to its ease of use, usefulness, and possible future use. Method: We analyzed 46 answers given to a global family of industrial surveys to assemble a conceptual framework for TRTD management and evaluate it by applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) in a feasibility study with 95 participants. Results: The conceptual framework can be useful for supporting the management of TRTD items, as pointed out by 89% of the participants. Most of the participants also indicated that they would gain productivity, performance, agility, and effectiveness by using the conceptual framework. Conclusion: Results indicate that the data embedded into the conceptual framework and the conceptual framework itself are promising to support the management of TRTD items.","PeriodicalId":187140,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a Conceptual Framework for Supporting Technical Debt Management in Testing Activities - A Feasibility Study\",\"authors\":\"Verusca Rocha, Sávio Freire, Manoel G. Mendonça, R. Spínola\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3559744.3559753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Test-related technical debt (TRTD) refers to debt items that affect software testing activities, compromising their quality. Having information on indicators of their presence, causes, effects, and preventive practices can support the management of TRTD items. Although several works have investigated TD indicators, causes, effects, and prevention, there is a need to investigate how to use this information for supporting the management of debt items in the context of testing activities. Aims: This work (i) presents an updated version of a conceptual framework that organizes a set of indicators, causes, effects, and preventive practices of TRTD and (ii) evaluates it with respect to its ease of use, usefulness, and possible future use. Method: We analyzed 46 answers given to a global family of industrial surveys to assemble a conceptual framework for TRTD management and evaluate it by applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) in a feasibility study with 95 participants. Results: The conceptual framework can be useful for supporting the management of TRTD items, as pointed out by 89% of the participants. Most of the participants also indicated that they would gain productivity, performance, agility, and effectiveness by using the conceptual framework. Conclusion: Results indicate that the data embedded into the conceptual framework and the conceptual framework itself are promising to support the management of TRTD items.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3559744.3559753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3559744.3559753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:与测试相关的技术债务(TRTD)指的是影响软件测试活动,损害其质量的债务项。拥有关于其存在、原因、影响和预防措施的指标的信息可以支持TRTD项目的管理。尽管一些工作已经调查了TD指标、原因、影响和预防,但是仍然需要调查如何在测试活动的背景下使用这些信息来支持债务项目的管理。目的:这项工作(i)提出了一个概念框架的更新版本,该框架组织了一套TRTD的指标、原因、影响和预防措施;(ii)对其易用性、有用性和未来可能的使用进行了评估。方法:我们分析了来自全球一系列行业调查的46个答案,以构建TRTD管理的概念框架,并通过在95名参与者的可行性研究中应用技术接受模型(TAM)对其进行评估。结果:89%的参与者指出,概念框架可用于支持TRTD项目的管理。大多数参与者还表示,通过使用概念框架,他们将获得生产力、性能、敏捷性和有效性。结论:结果表明,概念框架内嵌入的数据和概念框架本身都有望支持TRTD项目的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating a Conceptual Framework for Supporting Technical Debt Management in Testing Activities - A Feasibility Study
Context: Test-related technical debt (TRTD) refers to debt items that affect software testing activities, compromising their quality. Having information on indicators of their presence, causes, effects, and preventive practices can support the management of TRTD items. Although several works have investigated TD indicators, causes, effects, and prevention, there is a need to investigate how to use this information for supporting the management of debt items in the context of testing activities. Aims: This work (i) presents an updated version of a conceptual framework that organizes a set of indicators, causes, effects, and preventive practices of TRTD and (ii) evaluates it with respect to its ease of use, usefulness, and possible future use. Method: We analyzed 46 answers given to a global family of industrial surveys to assemble a conceptual framework for TRTD management and evaluate it by applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) in a feasibility study with 95 participants. Results: The conceptual framework can be useful for supporting the management of TRTD items, as pointed out by 89% of the participants. Most of the participants also indicated that they would gain productivity, performance, agility, and effectiveness by using the conceptual framework. Conclusion: Results indicate that the data embedded into the conceptual framework and the conceptual framework itself are promising to support the management of TRTD items.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信