倡导信息技术和信息安全

V. Zaborovskyy
{"title":"倡导信息技术和信息安全","authors":"V. Zaborovskyy","doi":"10.21779/2224-0241-2021-37-1-131-139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of theoretical and practical problems that arise of the use of information technologies by a lawyer in the course of their professional activities, as well as issues related to ensuring information security of such activities. The purpose of this article is to reveal the complex relationship between the need to use the latest information technologies (analyzing the legal nature of the most common types of such technologies) and ensuring an appropriate level of information security for advocacy in general. To achieve this goal, the author used a set of methods that are characteristic of legal science. So, the use of the system-structural method made it possible to formulate a general structure, contributed to the complete solution of the tasks. The dialectical method made it possible to reveal the essence of information technologies in advocacy and analyze their main types. The method of systems analysis provided an opportunity to comprehensively investigate the legal nature of information security in advocacy and identify possible threats to such security, and the synthesis method was used when formulating conclusions and other theoretical provisions.","PeriodicalId":346018,"journal":{"name":"Law Нerald of Dagestan State University","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SECURITY OF ADVOCACY\",\"authors\":\"V. Zaborovskyy\",\"doi\":\"10.21779/2224-0241-2021-37-1-131-139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the study of theoretical and practical problems that arise of the use of information technologies by a lawyer in the course of their professional activities, as well as issues related to ensuring information security of such activities. The purpose of this article is to reveal the complex relationship between the need to use the latest information technologies (analyzing the legal nature of the most common types of such technologies) and ensuring an appropriate level of information security for advocacy in general. To achieve this goal, the author used a set of methods that are characteristic of legal science. So, the use of the system-structural method made it possible to formulate a general structure, contributed to the complete solution of the tasks. The dialectical method made it possible to reveal the essence of information technologies in advocacy and analyze their main types. The method of systems analysis provided an opportunity to comprehensively investigate the legal nature of information security in advocacy and identify possible threats to such security, and the synthesis method was used when formulating conclusions and other theoretical provisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Нerald of Dagestan State University\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Нerald of Dagestan State University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21779/2224-0241-2021-37-1-131-139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Нerald of Dagestan State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21779/2224-0241-2021-37-1-131-139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于研究律师在其专业活动过程中使用信息技术所产生的理论和实践问题,以及与确保此类活动的信息安全有关的问题。本文的目的是揭示使用最新信息技术的需求(分析此类技术最常见类型的法律性质)与确保适当级别的信息安全之间的复杂关系。为了达到这一目的,笔者运用了一套具有法学特色的方法。因此,系统结构方法的使用使得制定总体结构成为可能,有助于任务的完整解决。辩证的方法揭示了信息技术宣传的本质,分析了信息技术宣传的主要类型。系统分析的方法为全面考察信息安全在倡导中的法律性质和识别信息安全可能面临的威胁提供了机会,并在制定结论和其他理论规定时采用了综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SECURITY OF ADVOCACY
The article is devoted to the study of theoretical and practical problems that arise of the use of information technologies by a lawyer in the course of their professional activities, as well as issues related to ensuring information security of such activities. The purpose of this article is to reveal the complex relationship between the need to use the latest information technologies (analyzing the legal nature of the most common types of such technologies) and ensuring an appropriate level of information security for advocacy in general. To achieve this goal, the author used a set of methods that are characteristic of legal science. So, the use of the system-structural method made it possible to formulate a general structure, contributed to the complete solution of the tasks. The dialectical method made it possible to reveal the essence of information technologies in advocacy and analyze their main types. The method of systems analysis provided an opportunity to comprehensively investigate the legal nature of information security in advocacy and identify possible threats to such security, and the synthesis method was used when formulating conclusions and other theoretical provisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信