R. Juwita, Erlina Marfianti, Ana Fauziyati, B. Hisyam
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间混合式学习对医学院见习项目内科阶段能力的影响[j]","authors":"R. Juwita, Erlina Marfianti, Ana Fauziyati, B. Hisyam","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.210930.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on all aspects of life including medical education at the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Islam Indonesia. Clinical learning was modified into combination of online and offline learning or blended learning. This study aimed to see the learning outcomes of students at the Internal Medicine stage between those who underwent conventional learning i.e. 11 weeks full of offline education in the hospital and those who underwent blended learning, namely 4 weeks online followed by 7 weeks offline. Method This study was a case control study that aimed to compare the competency attainment of the Internal Medicine stage in a group of students who underwent blended learning versus those who underwent full offline learning. Competency achievement was seen from assessment scores (Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEx), Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS), clinical tutorials, journal reading, case reflection, Objective Structured Long Examination Record (OSLER), written test scores and final scores. The statistical analysis used was descriptive analysis and the Mann Whitney sample test. The difference was significant if p <0.05. This study had received ethical clearance from the Ethics Committee of FK UII. Result Initially we selected 30 students for each group, but data that met the inclusion criteria were obtained for 13 students who underwent blended learning and 18 students who had an offline stage. The data that were excluded were incomplete assessment data. The study was conducted in December 2020 January 2021. There were significant differences in the case reflection scores, written examinations and final scores between the two groups with a p value < 0.05 in sequence; 0.00, 0.03, and 0.001. Meanwhile, the scores for Mini-CEx, DOPS, journal reading, clinical tutorial, and OSLER were not significantly different. The mean value obtained by the offline group was better than the blended learning group. Conclusions The competency achievement shown by the assessment results in the blended learning method group was lower than the offline method group for the medical professional education program during the Covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":239200,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Blended Learning in Covid-19 Pandemic with the Achievement of Internal Medicine Stage Competencies at the Clerkship Program of the Faculty of Medicine UII\",\"authors\":\"R. Juwita, Erlina Marfianti, Ana Fauziyati, B. Hisyam\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.210930.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on all aspects of life including medical education at the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Islam Indonesia. Clinical learning was modified into combination of online and offline learning or blended learning. This study aimed to see the learning outcomes of students at the Internal Medicine stage between those who underwent conventional learning i.e. 11 weeks full of offline education in the hospital and those who underwent blended learning, namely 4 weeks online followed by 7 weeks offline. Method This study was a case control study that aimed to compare the competency attainment of the Internal Medicine stage in a group of students who underwent blended learning versus those who underwent full offline learning. Competency achievement was seen from assessment scores (Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEx), Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS), clinical tutorials, journal reading, case reflection, Objective Structured Long Examination Record (OSLER), written test scores and final scores. The statistical analysis used was descriptive analysis and the Mann Whitney sample test. The difference was significant if p <0.05. This study had received ethical clearance from the Ethics Committee of FK UII. Result Initially we selected 30 students for each group, but data that met the inclusion criteria were obtained for 13 students who underwent blended learning and 18 students who had an offline stage. The data that were excluded were incomplete assessment data. The study was conducted in December 2020 January 2021. There were significant differences in the case reflection scores, written examinations and final scores between the two groups with a p value < 0.05 in sequence; 0.00, 0.03, and 0.001. Meanwhile, the scores for Mini-CEx, DOPS, journal reading, clinical tutorial, and OSLER were not significantly different. The mean value obtained by the offline group was better than the blended learning group. Conclusions The competency achievement shown by the assessment results in the blended learning method group was lower than the offline method group for the medical professional education program during the Covid-19 pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210930.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210930.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
新冠肺炎大流行对生活的各个方面都产生了影响,包括印度尼西亚伊斯兰大学医学院的医学教育。临床学习改进为线上线下结合学习或混合式学习。本研究旨在观察内科阶段学生接受常规学习即在医院进行11周的线下教育与进行混合学习即4周在线后7周线下教育的学习效果。方法本研究采用病例对照研究的方法,比较采用混合学习和完全离线学习的一组学生在内科阶段的能力获得情况。从评估成绩(Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise, Mini-CEx)、程序技能直接观察(Direct Observation of Procedural Skills, DOPS)、临床辅导、期刊阅读、案例反思、客观结构化长考试记录(Objective Structured Long Examination Record, OSLER)、笔试成绩和期末成绩)来看胜任力成就。统计分析采用描述性分析和Mann - Whitney样本检验。p <0.05,差异有统计学意义。本研究获得了FK ii伦理委员会的伦理许可。最初,我们为每组选择了30名学生,但在13名混合学习的学生和18名离线阶段的学生中获得了符合纳入标准的数据。排除的资料为不完整的评估资料。该研究于2020年12月至2021年1月进行。两组病例反思评分、笔试评分、期末评分差异有统计学意义,p值依次< 0.05;0.00, 0.03和0.001。同时,Mini-CEx、DOPS、期刊阅读、临床指导和OSLER的得分无显著差异。离线学习组的平均值优于混合学习组。结论新冠肺炎疫情期间医学专业教育混合学习方式组学生胜任力测评结果低于离线学习方式组。
The Effect of Blended Learning in Covid-19 Pandemic with the Achievement of Internal Medicine Stage Competencies at the Clerkship Program of the Faculty of Medicine UII
Background The Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on all aspects of life including medical education at the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Islam Indonesia. Clinical learning was modified into combination of online and offline learning or blended learning. This study aimed to see the learning outcomes of students at the Internal Medicine stage between those who underwent conventional learning i.e. 11 weeks full of offline education in the hospital and those who underwent blended learning, namely 4 weeks online followed by 7 weeks offline. Method This study was a case control study that aimed to compare the competency attainment of the Internal Medicine stage in a group of students who underwent blended learning versus those who underwent full offline learning. Competency achievement was seen from assessment scores (Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEx), Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS), clinical tutorials, journal reading, case reflection, Objective Structured Long Examination Record (OSLER), written test scores and final scores. The statistical analysis used was descriptive analysis and the Mann Whitney sample test. The difference was significant if p <0.05. This study had received ethical clearance from the Ethics Committee of FK UII. Result Initially we selected 30 students for each group, but data that met the inclusion criteria were obtained for 13 students who underwent blended learning and 18 students who had an offline stage. The data that were excluded were incomplete assessment data. The study was conducted in December 2020 January 2021. There were significant differences in the case reflection scores, written examinations and final scores between the two groups with a p value < 0.05 in sequence; 0.00, 0.03, and 0.001. Meanwhile, the scores for Mini-CEx, DOPS, journal reading, clinical tutorial, and OSLER were not significantly different. The mean value obtained by the offline group was better than the blended learning group. Conclusions The competency achievement shown by the assessment results in the blended learning method group was lower than the offline method group for the medical professional education program during the Covid-19 pandemic.