“弃儿村”的重新安置

Michael J. Wenzl
{"title":"“弃儿村”的重新安置","authors":"Michael J. Wenzl","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1974.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"His mind resembled a fertile, but thin soil.\" This was Boswell's opinion of Goldsmith, and though Johnson urged that he be remembered for his virtues rather than his faults, the verdict has pretty well stood.1 Goldsmith was the odd member of the circle of interesting types that gathered around Johnson, and though he was no less interesting than the rest, he was considered a second-class intellectual citizen. He was chided for not being a systematic thinker, for being overly concerned with \"imaginary consequence,\" and for not having an especially large commitment to truth. The impression that comes down to us is of a bumbling, erratic man—a man with little disposition toward logic, unsystematic in his life and his thought, the perfect picture of the incompetent misfit who would have perished were it not for the concern of his friends, especially \"the Great Cham of Literature.\" But as an artist, the impression is certainly different. The same praise paid by Johnson to Gray might also be said to apply to some of Goldsmith's productions: he wrote few works which survive, but those which we have are excellent. The Deserted Village\" is such a work. That a man so disorganized and unsystematic in his personal life might rise to heights of literary organization is demonstrated by the treatment The Deserted Village\" has received from subsequent critics. It has not been neglected by those who admire the coherence and logical progression of its structure, and it has been upon its logical structure that the most informed studies have been based. One such study has been done by Richard Eversole in which he concentrates on what he calls the \"oratorical design\" of the poem. In Eversole's view, Goldsmith's primary poetic problem in composing \"The Deserted Village\" was the effective presentation of controversial material. Goldsmith was aware that the views he was espousing in the poem were controversial, and that he would need the most oratorically effective presentation. To meet this difficulty, he chose the form of the classical oration. An examination of the poem will reveal that it falls into the traditional seven divisions of the classical oration: exordium, narratio, propositio, confirmatio, reprehensio, and peroratio.2 Ricardo Quintana takes what is perhaps a more useful approach to the poem when he suggests that the structure of \"The Deserted Village\" is that of an argument. He proceeds through the poem, section by section, and demonstrates how the argument develops. In the course of his study, he does nod in passing to the idea that in this poem the logical and the poetical","PeriodicalId":344945,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1974-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Populating \\\"The Deserted Village\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Wenzl\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/RMR.1974.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"His mind resembled a fertile, but thin soil.\\\" This was Boswell's opinion of Goldsmith, and though Johnson urged that he be remembered for his virtues rather than his faults, the verdict has pretty well stood.1 Goldsmith was the odd member of the circle of interesting types that gathered around Johnson, and though he was no less interesting than the rest, he was considered a second-class intellectual citizen. He was chided for not being a systematic thinker, for being overly concerned with \\\"imaginary consequence,\\\" and for not having an especially large commitment to truth. The impression that comes down to us is of a bumbling, erratic man—a man with little disposition toward logic, unsystematic in his life and his thought, the perfect picture of the incompetent misfit who would have perished were it not for the concern of his friends, especially \\\"the Great Cham of Literature.\\\" But as an artist, the impression is certainly different. The same praise paid by Johnson to Gray might also be said to apply to some of Goldsmith's productions: he wrote few works which survive, but those which we have are excellent. The Deserted Village\\\" is such a work. That a man so disorganized and unsystematic in his personal life might rise to heights of literary organization is demonstrated by the treatment The Deserted Village\\\" has received from subsequent critics. It has not been neglected by those who admire the coherence and logical progression of its structure, and it has been upon its logical structure that the most informed studies have been based. One such study has been done by Richard Eversole in which he concentrates on what he calls the \\\"oratorical design\\\" of the poem. In Eversole's view, Goldsmith's primary poetic problem in composing \\\"The Deserted Village\\\" was the effective presentation of controversial material. Goldsmith was aware that the views he was espousing in the poem were controversial, and that he would need the most oratorically effective presentation. To meet this difficulty, he chose the form of the classical oration. An examination of the poem will reveal that it falls into the traditional seven divisions of the classical oration: exordium, narratio, propositio, confirmatio, reprehensio, and peroratio.2 Ricardo Quintana takes what is perhaps a more useful approach to the poem when he suggests that the structure of \\\"The Deserted Village\\\" is that of an argument. He proceeds through the poem, section by section, and demonstrates how the argument develops. In the course of his study, he does nod in passing to the idea that in this poem the logical and the poetical\",\"PeriodicalId\":344945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1974-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1974.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1974.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“他的思想就像一块肥沃而稀薄的土壤。”这是博斯韦尔对戈德史密斯的看法,尽管约翰逊敦促人们记住戈德史密斯的优点,而不是缺点,但这个结论还是很有说服力的在聚集在约翰逊周围的一群有趣的人当中,戈德史密斯是一个奇怪的成员,尽管他和其他人一样有趣,但他被认为是一个二等知识公民。他被指责不是一个系统的思想家,过于关注“想象的结果”,对真理没有特别大的承诺。留给我们的印象是一个笨手笨脚、反复无常的人——一个缺乏逻辑倾向的人,他的生活和思想没有条理,这是一个无能的不合群者的完美形象,要不是他的朋友们,尤其是“文学巨子”的关心,他早就完蛋了。但作为一个艺术家,这种印象肯定是不同的。约翰逊对格雷的称赞可以说也同样适用于戈德史密斯的一些作品:他写的作品流传下来的很少,但我们拥有的那些都是优秀的。《荒村》就是这样一部作品。一个在个人生活中如此无组织、无系统的人可能会上升到文学组织的高度,这一点从后来的评论家对《荒村》的处理中得到了证明。那些欣赏其结构的连贯性和逻辑进展的人并没有忽视它,而最明智的研究正是基于它的逻辑结构。理查德·埃弗索尔(Richard Eversole)就做过这样一项研究,他把注意力集中在他所谓的诗歌“修辞设计”上。在埃弗索尔看来,戈德史密斯在创作《荒凉的村庄》时面临的主要诗意问题是如何有效地呈现有争议的材料。戈德史密斯意识到他在这首诗中所支持的观点是有争议的,他需要最有效的演讲。为了克服这个困难,他选择了古典演讲的形式。对这首诗的考察将揭示,它属于传统的古典演说的七个部分:引言,叙述,命题,确认,谴责和表演里卡多·金塔纳采用了一种或许更有用的方法来解读这首诗,他认为《荒村》的结构是一种争论。他一节一节地读这首诗,并展示了论点是如何发展的。在他的研究过程中,他确实顺便提到了这首诗的逻辑和诗意
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-Populating "The Deserted Village"
"His mind resembled a fertile, but thin soil." This was Boswell's opinion of Goldsmith, and though Johnson urged that he be remembered for his virtues rather than his faults, the verdict has pretty well stood.1 Goldsmith was the odd member of the circle of interesting types that gathered around Johnson, and though he was no less interesting than the rest, he was considered a second-class intellectual citizen. He was chided for not being a systematic thinker, for being overly concerned with "imaginary consequence," and for not having an especially large commitment to truth. The impression that comes down to us is of a bumbling, erratic man—a man with little disposition toward logic, unsystematic in his life and his thought, the perfect picture of the incompetent misfit who would have perished were it not for the concern of his friends, especially "the Great Cham of Literature." But as an artist, the impression is certainly different. The same praise paid by Johnson to Gray might also be said to apply to some of Goldsmith's productions: he wrote few works which survive, but those which we have are excellent. The Deserted Village" is such a work. That a man so disorganized and unsystematic in his personal life might rise to heights of literary organization is demonstrated by the treatment The Deserted Village" has received from subsequent critics. It has not been neglected by those who admire the coherence and logical progression of its structure, and it has been upon its logical structure that the most informed studies have been based. One such study has been done by Richard Eversole in which he concentrates on what he calls the "oratorical design" of the poem. In Eversole's view, Goldsmith's primary poetic problem in composing "The Deserted Village" was the effective presentation of controversial material. Goldsmith was aware that the views he was espousing in the poem were controversial, and that he would need the most oratorically effective presentation. To meet this difficulty, he chose the form of the classical oration. An examination of the poem will reveal that it falls into the traditional seven divisions of the classical oration: exordium, narratio, propositio, confirmatio, reprehensio, and peroratio.2 Ricardo Quintana takes what is perhaps a more useful approach to the poem when he suggests that the structure of "The Deserted Village" is that of an argument. He proceeds through the poem, section by section, and demonstrates how the argument develops. In the course of his study, he does nod in passing to the idea that in this poem the logical and the poetical
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信