Misato Oi, M. Yamada, Fumiya Okubo, Atsushi Shimada, H. Ogata
{"title":"教育大数据研究结果的可重复性:初步研究","authors":"Misato Oi, M. Yamada, Fumiya Okubo, Atsushi Shimada, H. Ogata","doi":"10.1145/3027385.3029445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we examined whether previous findings on educational big data consisting of e-book logs from a given academic course can be reproduced with different data from other academic courses. The previous findings showed that (1) students who attained consistently good achievement more frequently browsed different e-books and their pages than low achievers and that (2) this difference was found only for logs of preparation for course sessions (preview), not for reviewing material (review). Preliminarily, we analyzed e-book logs from four courses. The results were reproduced in only one course and only partially, that is, (1) high achievers more frequently changed e-books than low achievers (2) for preview. This finding suggests that to allow effective usage of learning and teaching analyses, we need to carefully construct an educational environment to ensure reproducibility.","PeriodicalId":160897,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of findings from educational big data: a preliminary study\",\"authors\":\"Misato Oi, M. Yamada, Fumiya Okubo, Atsushi Shimada, H. Ogata\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3027385.3029445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we examined whether previous findings on educational big data consisting of e-book logs from a given academic course can be reproduced with different data from other academic courses. The previous findings showed that (1) students who attained consistently good achievement more frequently browsed different e-books and their pages than low achievers and that (2) this difference was found only for logs of preparation for course sessions (preview), not for reviewing material (review). Preliminarily, we analyzed e-book logs from four courses. The results were reproduced in only one course and only partially, that is, (1) high achievers more frequently changed e-books than low achievers (2) for preview. This finding suggests that to allow effective usage of learning and teaching analyses, we need to carefully construct an educational environment to ensure reproducibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":160897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3029445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3029445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reproducibility of findings from educational big data: a preliminary study
In this paper, we examined whether previous findings on educational big data consisting of e-book logs from a given academic course can be reproduced with different data from other academic courses. The previous findings showed that (1) students who attained consistently good achievement more frequently browsed different e-books and their pages than low achievers and that (2) this difference was found only for logs of preparation for course sessions (preview), not for reviewing material (review). Preliminarily, we analyzed e-book logs from four courses. The results were reproduced in only one course and only partially, that is, (1) high achievers more frequently changed e-books than low achievers (2) for preview. This finding suggests that to allow effective usage of learning and teaching analyses, we need to carefully construct an educational environment to ensure reproducibility.