人工神经网络与GEP模型在水运系统压降预测中的比较研究

R. Chakraborty, U. Mandal, R. Barman
{"title":"人工神经网络与GEP模型在水运系统压降预测中的比较研究","authors":"R. Chakraborty, U. Mandal, R. Barman","doi":"10.5815/ijieeb.2020.05.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, the parameter responsible to find out pressure drops in a pipeline network system has been modeled by Gene Expression Programming Based on the experimental data. The different factors like Pipe diameter, Particle diameter, liquid density, Solid density liquid Viscosity, Volume fraction, Velocity, Solid concentration are taken into consideration as the input parameter. GEP model was developed to predict the pressure drop within the pipeline system. GEP model predicts the pressure drop with an accuracy of mean R-Square 0.999153373.As the input parameter is responsible for the selection of soft computing method and both ANN and GEP model is considered in order to validate the output parameters. The result of GEP has been compared with an ANN model, to observe the level of accuracy of the predicted pressure drop with a correlation to predict pressure drop shown by equation 6. The obtained results of both GEP and ANN models are being compared and GEP predicted results are found to be better in predicting the output parameter. The mean absolute error is found to be 15.566 % by the ANN model wherein the GEP model predicts with an accuracy of 8.993 %.The results indicate that the GEP is better tool to predict pressure drop with more accuracy.","PeriodicalId":427770,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of ANN and GEP Model to Predict the Pressure Drop in the Water Transportation System\",\"authors\":\"R. Chakraborty, U. Mandal, R. Barman\",\"doi\":\"10.5815/ijieeb.2020.05.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present study, the parameter responsible to find out pressure drops in a pipeline network system has been modeled by Gene Expression Programming Based on the experimental data. The different factors like Pipe diameter, Particle diameter, liquid density, Solid density liquid Viscosity, Volume fraction, Velocity, Solid concentration are taken into consideration as the input parameter. GEP model was developed to predict the pressure drop within the pipeline system. GEP model predicts the pressure drop with an accuracy of mean R-Square 0.999153373.As the input parameter is responsible for the selection of soft computing method and both ANN and GEP model is considered in order to validate the output parameters. The result of GEP has been compared with an ANN model, to observe the level of accuracy of the predicted pressure drop with a correlation to predict pressure drop shown by equation 6. The obtained results of both GEP and ANN models are being compared and GEP predicted results are found to be better in predicting the output parameter. The mean absolute error is found to be 15.566 % by the ANN model wherein the GEP model predicts with an accuracy of 8.993 %.The results indicate that the GEP is better tool to predict pressure drop with more accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2020.05.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2020.05.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文在实验数据的基础上,利用基因表达式编程对管网系统中负责确定压降的参数进行建模。以管径、颗粒直径、液体密度、固体密度、液体粘度、体积分数、速度、固体浓度等因素作为输入参数。建立了预测管道系统内压降的GEP模型。GEP模型预测压降的平均r平方精度为0.999153373。由于输入参数负责软计算方法的选择,并且同时考虑了ANN和GEP模型以验证输出参数。将GEP的结果与ANN模型进行比较,观察预测压降的准确度与预测压降的相关性,如式6所示。比较了GEP模型和ANN模型的预测结果,发现GEP模型对输出参数的预测效果更好。ANN模型的平均绝对误差为15.566%,而GEP模型的预测精度为8.993%。结果表明,GEP是预测压降的较好工具,具有较高的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of ANN and GEP Model to Predict the Pressure Drop in the Water Transportation System
In the present study, the parameter responsible to find out pressure drops in a pipeline network system has been modeled by Gene Expression Programming Based on the experimental data. The different factors like Pipe diameter, Particle diameter, liquid density, Solid density liquid Viscosity, Volume fraction, Velocity, Solid concentration are taken into consideration as the input parameter. GEP model was developed to predict the pressure drop within the pipeline system. GEP model predicts the pressure drop with an accuracy of mean R-Square 0.999153373.As the input parameter is responsible for the selection of soft computing method and both ANN and GEP model is considered in order to validate the output parameters. The result of GEP has been compared with an ANN model, to observe the level of accuracy of the predicted pressure drop with a correlation to predict pressure drop shown by equation 6. The obtained results of both GEP and ANN models are being compared and GEP predicted results are found to be better in predicting the output parameter. The mean absolute error is found to be 15.566 % by the ANN model wherein the GEP model predicts with an accuracy of 8.993 %.The results indicate that the GEP is better tool to predict pressure drop with more accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信