软件从业员在支付技术债务方面有哪些做法?一项国际家庭调查的结果

B. Pérez, C. Castellanos, D. Correal, Nicolli Rios, Sávio Freire, R. Spínola, C. Seaman
{"title":"软件从业员在支付技术债务方面有哪些做法?一项国际家庭调查的结果","authors":"B. Pérez, C. Castellanos, D. Correal, Nicolli Rios, Sávio Freire, R. Spínola, C. Seaman","doi":"10.1145/3387906.3388632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Technical debt (TD) is a metaphor used to describe technical decisions that can give the company a benefit in the short term but possibly hurting the overall quality of the software in the long term.Objective: This study aims to characterize the current state of practices related to TD payment from the point of view of software practitioners.Method: We used a survey research method to collect and analyze - both quantitatively and qualitatively - a corpus of responses from a survey of 432 software practitioners from Colombia, Chile, Brazil, and the United States, as a part of the InsighTD project.Results: We were able to identify that refactoring (24.3%) was the main practice related to TD payment, along with improving testing (6.2%) and improve design (5.8%). Also, we identify that small-sized systems and big-sized systems, along with young systems (less than one year) tend to use more refactoring. As a part of these results, we also could identify that some practices do not eliminate the debt by itself, but support a favorable scenario for TD payment or prevention. Additionally, after comparing the three major TD types cited (code debt, test debt and design debt) we could discover an important similarity of TD payment practices between code debt and design debt. Lastly, we identified that no matter the cause leading to TD occurrence, refactoring remained the most common practice.Conclusion: Definition of practices related to TD payment is an essential activity for software development teams. Developing healthy software systems that can be maintained in the future requires that companies find the right approaches for TD payment.","PeriodicalId":345508,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the Practices used by Software Practitioners on Technical Debt Payment? Results From an International Family of Surveys\",\"authors\":\"B. Pérez, C. Castellanos, D. Correal, Nicolli Rios, Sávio Freire, R. Spínola, C. Seaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3387906.3388632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Technical debt (TD) is a metaphor used to describe technical decisions that can give the company a benefit in the short term but possibly hurting the overall quality of the software in the long term.Objective: This study aims to characterize the current state of practices related to TD payment from the point of view of software practitioners.Method: We used a survey research method to collect and analyze - both quantitatively and qualitatively - a corpus of responses from a survey of 432 software practitioners from Colombia, Chile, Brazil, and the United States, as a part of the InsighTD project.Results: We were able to identify that refactoring (24.3%) was the main practice related to TD payment, along with improving testing (6.2%) and improve design (5.8%). Also, we identify that small-sized systems and big-sized systems, along with young systems (less than one year) tend to use more refactoring. As a part of these results, we also could identify that some practices do not eliminate the debt by itself, but support a favorable scenario for TD payment or prevention. Additionally, after comparing the three major TD types cited (code debt, test debt and design debt) we could discover an important similarity of TD payment practices between code debt and design debt. Lastly, we identified that no matter the cause leading to TD occurrence, refactoring remained the most common practice.Conclusion: Definition of practices related to TD payment is an essential activity for software development teams. Developing healthy software systems that can be maintained in the future requires that companies find the right approaches for TD payment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387906.3388632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387906.3388632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

背景:技术债务(TD)是一个比喻,用来描述可以在短期内给公司带来好处,但从长远来看可能会损害软件整体质量的技术决策。目的:本研究旨在从软件从业者的角度描述与TD支付相关的实践现状。方法:作为InsighTD项目的一部分,我们使用了一种调查研究方法来收集和分析——从数量上和质量上——来自哥伦比亚、智利、巴西和美国的432名软件从业者的调查的反应语料库。结果:我们能够确定重构(24.3%)是与TD支付相关的主要实践,以及改进测试(6.2%)和改进设计(5.8%)。此外,我们确定小型系统和大型系统,以及年轻系统(不到一年)倾向于使用更多的重构。作为这些结果的一部分,我们还可以确定一些实践本身并不能消除债务,但是支持TD支付或预防的有利场景。此外,在比较了所引用的三种主要的TD类型(代码债、测试债和设计债)之后,我们可以发现代码债和设计债之间TD支付实践的重要相似性。最后,我们确定了无论导致TD发生的原因是什么,重构仍然是最常见的实践。结论:定义与TD支付相关的实践是软件开发团队的基本活动。开发可在未来维护的健康软件系统需要公司找到合适的输配电支付方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What are the Practices used by Software Practitioners on Technical Debt Payment? Results From an International Family of Surveys
Context: Technical debt (TD) is a metaphor used to describe technical decisions that can give the company a benefit in the short term but possibly hurting the overall quality of the software in the long term.Objective: This study aims to characterize the current state of practices related to TD payment from the point of view of software practitioners.Method: We used a survey research method to collect and analyze - both quantitatively and qualitatively - a corpus of responses from a survey of 432 software practitioners from Colombia, Chile, Brazil, and the United States, as a part of the InsighTD project.Results: We were able to identify that refactoring (24.3%) was the main practice related to TD payment, along with improving testing (6.2%) and improve design (5.8%). Also, we identify that small-sized systems and big-sized systems, along with young systems (less than one year) tend to use more refactoring. As a part of these results, we also could identify that some practices do not eliminate the debt by itself, but support a favorable scenario for TD payment or prevention. Additionally, after comparing the three major TD types cited (code debt, test debt and design debt) we could discover an important similarity of TD payment practices between code debt and design debt. Lastly, we identified that no matter the cause leading to TD occurrence, refactoring remained the most common practice.Conclusion: Definition of practices related to TD payment is an essential activity for software development teams. Developing healthy software systems that can be maintained in the future requires that companies find the right approaches for TD payment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信