当代信任下国家镇压的遗产:苏俄不分青红皂白的镇压与有针对性的镇压

Nemanja Cocic, Chrysostomos Tabakis, Andrey Ten
{"title":"当代信任下国家镇压的遗产:苏俄不分青红皂白的镇压与有针对性的镇压","authors":"Nemanja Cocic, Chrysostomos Tabakis, Andrey Ten","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3914609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indiscriminate state repression leaves long-term negative consequences on interpersonal trust and trust in state institutions. In this paper, we investigate whether a variation in density of Soviet police forces, which governed the level of selectivity in repression execution, lead to heterogeneity in long-term trust response to repression. Similar to other studies, we find that both horizontal trust and vertical trust are negatively associated with indiscriminate repression exposure in the past. However, our results suggest that the magnitude of the negative effect diminishes with repression executed in a more selective fashion proxied by the intensity of the perpetrator’s deployment. Surprisingly, we find that trust response might even inverse to positive in localities where the state repression had been accompanied by a perpetrator’s presence at extremely high levels, i.e., when the state could ensure highly selective repression. Overall, our findings propose that the legacy of totalitarian regimes on horizontal and vertical trust might depend on the state’s capacity to execute repression with more or less precision against perceived enemies.","PeriodicalId":347047,"journal":{"name":"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Legacy of State Repression on Contemporary Trust: Indiscriminate versus Targeted Repression in Soviet Russia\",\"authors\":\"Nemanja Cocic, Chrysostomos Tabakis, Andrey Ten\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3914609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indiscriminate state repression leaves long-term negative consequences on interpersonal trust and trust in state institutions. In this paper, we investigate whether a variation in density of Soviet police forces, which governed the level of selectivity in repression execution, lead to heterogeneity in long-term trust response to repression. Similar to other studies, we find that both horizontal trust and vertical trust are negatively associated with indiscriminate repression exposure in the past. However, our results suggest that the magnitude of the negative effect diminishes with repression executed in a more selective fashion proxied by the intensity of the perpetrator’s deployment. Surprisingly, we find that trust response might even inverse to positive in localities where the state repression had been accompanied by a perpetrator’s presence at extremely high levels, i.e., when the state could ensure highly selective repression. Overall, our findings propose that the legacy of totalitarian regimes on horizontal and vertical trust might depend on the state’s capacity to execute repression with more or less precision against perceived enemies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3914609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3914609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不分青红皂白的国家镇压会对人际信任和对国家机构的信任产生长期的负面影响。在本文中,我们研究了苏联警察部队密度的变化是否会导致对镇压的长期信任反应的异质性,这决定了镇压执行的选择性水平。与其他研究类似,我们发现横向信任和纵向信任都与过去的无差别压抑暴露呈负相关。然而,我们的研究结果表明,负面影响的程度随着以更有选择性的方式执行的镇压而减少,这种方式由犯罪者的部署强度所代表。令人惊讶的是,我们发现信任反应甚至可能在国家镇压伴随着犯罪者极高水平的存在的地方逆转为积极的,即当国家可以确保高度选择性的镇压时。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,极权主义政权在横向和纵向信任方面的遗产可能取决于国家对其感知的敌人或多或少精确地执行镇压的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Legacy of State Repression on Contemporary Trust: Indiscriminate versus Targeted Repression in Soviet Russia
Indiscriminate state repression leaves long-term negative consequences on interpersonal trust and trust in state institutions. In this paper, we investigate whether a variation in density of Soviet police forces, which governed the level of selectivity in repression execution, lead to heterogeneity in long-term trust response to repression. Similar to other studies, we find that both horizontal trust and vertical trust are negatively associated with indiscriminate repression exposure in the past. However, our results suggest that the magnitude of the negative effect diminishes with repression executed in a more selective fashion proxied by the intensity of the perpetrator’s deployment. Surprisingly, we find that trust response might even inverse to positive in localities where the state repression had been accompanied by a perpetrator’s presence at extremely high levels, i.e., when the state could ensure highly selective repression. Overall, our findings propose that the legacy of totalitarian regimes on horizontal and vertical trust might depend on the state’s capacity to execute repression with more or less precision against perceived enemies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信