运用模糊德尔菲法和层次分析法分析在线土耳其语教师胜任力

Kayhan İnan
{"title":"运用模糊德尔菲法和层次分析法分析在线土耳其语教师胜任力","authors":"Kayhan İnan","doi":"10.5539/ies.v16n2p46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distance and online education have required instructors to acquire new skills and competencies for language teaching. This research aimed to determine online Turkish language instructor competencies. It comprised two stages in which Fuzzy Delphi and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods were used. In the first stage, 52 competencies under seven categories were compiled from the literature by applying the Fuzzy Delphi technique. In the second stage, the AHP method was used to determine the significance and weight of the competencies. There were five competencies in the “technical” category, three in the “individual” category, six in the “management and planning” category, three in the “material” category, nine in the “communication” category, eight in the “learner autonomy” category, and four in the “privacy and security” category. The findings suggested that “communication” was essential competence, and that “pedagogical” competence was more critical than “technical” competence. Furthermore, it was revealed that the instructors did not regard “autonomy” as competence. It also can be inferred that the instructors’ “individual” competencies were not considered very important.","PeriodicalId":299098,"journal":{"name":"International Education Studies","volume":"513 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Online Turkish Language Instructor Competencies by Fuzzy Delphi and Analytical Hierarchy Process\",\"authors\":\"Kayhan İnan\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/ies.v16n2p46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Distance and online education have required instructors to acquire new skills and competencies for language teaching. This research aimed to determine online Turkish language instructor competencies. It comprised two stages in which Fuzzy Delphi and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods were used. In the first stage, 52 competencies under seven categories were compiled from the literature by applying the Fuzzy Delphi technique. In the second stage, the AHP method was used to determine the significance and weight of the competencies. There were five competencies in the “technical” category, three in the “individual” category, six in the “management and planning” category, three in the “material” category, nine in the “communication” category, eight in the “learner autonomy” category, and four in the “privacy and security” category. The findings suggested that “communication” was essential competence, and that “pedagogical” competence was more critical than “technical” competence. Furthermore, it was revealed that the instructors did not regard “autonomy” as competence. It also can be inferred that the instructors’ “individual” competencies were not considered very important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Education Studies\",\"volume\":\"513 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Education Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n2p46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n2p46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

远程和在线教育要求教师掌握语言教学的新技能和能力。本研究旨在确定在线土耳其语教师的能力。它包括模糊德尔菲和层次分析法(AHP)两个阶段。在第一阶段,运用模糊德尔菲法从文献中整理出7类52个胜任力。在第二阶段,采用层次分析法确定胜任力的显著性和权重。“技术”类有5项能力,“个人”类有3项能力,“管理和计划”类有6项能力,“材料”类有3项能力,“沟通”类有9项能力,“学习者自主”类有8项能力,“隐私和安全”类有4项能力。研究结果表明,“沟通”能力是基本能力,而“教学”能力比“技术”能力更重要。此外,我们还发现教师并未将“自主性”视为胜任力。也可以推断,教师的“个人”能力并不被认为是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Online Turkish Language Instructor Competencies by Fuzzy Delphi and Analytical Hierarchy Process
Distance and online education have required instructors to acquire new skills and competencies for language teaching. This research aimed to determine online Turkish language instructor competencies. It comprised two stages in which Fuzzy Delphi and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods were used. In the first stage, 52 competencies under seven categories were compiled from the literature by applying the Fuzzy Delphi technique. In the second stage, the AHP method was used to determine the significance and weight of the competencies. There were five competencies in the “technical” category, three in the “individual” category, six in the “management and planning” category, three in the “material” category, nine in the “communication” category, eight in the “learner autonomy” category, and four in the “privacy and security” category. The findings suggested that “communication” was essential competence, and that “pedagogical” competence was more critical than “technical” competence. Furthermore, it was revealed that the instructors did not regard “autonomy” as competence. It also can be inferred that the instructors’ “individual” competencies were not considered very important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信