法庭记录:创造中的历史,获取的知识

L. Garth
{"title":"法庭记录:创造中的历史,获取的知识","authors":"L. Garth","doi":"10.14713/JRUL.V51I2.1690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IT H A S only been of recent date that organizations such as the Historical Society of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and the Historical Society of the Third Circuit have come into being, in order to fill a void in sore need of being filled. This void may have occurred because, for reasons still unfathomed, historians by and large have traditionally ignored court records as a source of historical research. It may be that they have done so because, not having been trained primarily in the law, historians have not been attracted to, or may be unaware of, the rich historical lore that is buried in judicial records. O r , it may be because a basic lack of familiarity with the legal discipline has led historians to discount the historical value of materials found in these records. By doing so, they may very well have forfeited an understanding of those events which preceded, and then succeeded, a particular case decision—events that may have had an influence on the future directions that our society has taken. More likely, in my judgment, the failure to study and analyze court records from an historical perspective, stems from a combination of these factors, as well as others, to which I have not adverted. Whatever the reason, however, even a hurried and abbreviated journey through early court dockets reveals to us now that the problems facing us today have had in many instances their genesis in years past, and that the events g iv ing rise to those problems may, when examined and understood, possibly provide assistance in solving the 20th Century concerns presently confronting us. Indeed, it should come as no surprise to us that","PeriodicalId":247763,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Rutgers University Libraries","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Court Records: History in the Making, Knowledge for the Taking\",\"authors\":\"L. Garth\",\"doi\":\"10.14713/JRUL.V51I2.1690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IT H A S only been of recent date that organizations such as the Historical Society of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and the Historical Society of the Third Circuit have come into being, in order to fill a void in sore need of being filled. This void may have occurred because, for reasons still unfathomed, historians by and large have traditionally ignored court records as a source of historical research. It may be that they have done so because, not having been trained primarily in the law, historians have not been attracted to, or may be unaware of, the rich historical lore that is buried in judicial records. O r , it may be because a basic lack of familiarity with the legal discipline has led historians to discount the historical value of materials found in these records. By doing so, they may very well have forfeited an understanding of those events which preceded, and then succeeded, a particular case decision—events that may have had an influence on the future directions that our society has taken. More likely, in my judgment, the failure to study and analyze court records from an historical perspective, stems from a combination of these factors, as well as others, to which I have not adverted. Whatever the reason, however, even a hurried and abbreviated journey through early court dockets reveals to us now that the problems facing us today have had in many instances their genesis in years past, and that the events g iv ing rise to those problems may, when examined and understood, possibly provide assistance in solving the 20th Century concerns presently confronting us. Indeed, it should come as no surprise to us that\",\"PeriodicalId\":247763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Rutgers University Libraries\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Rutgers University Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14713/JRUL.V51I2.1690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Rutgers University Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14713/JRUL.V51I2.1690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到最近,美国新泽西州地区法院历史学会和第三巡回法院历史学会等组织才成立,以填补迫切需要填补的空白。造成这种空白的原因可能是,历史学家在传统上基本上忽略了将法庭记录作为历史研究的来源。他们之所以这样做,可能是因为历史学家主要不是受过法律方面的训练,他们没有被司法记录中丰富的历史知识所吸引,或者可能不知道这些知识。或者,这可能是因为对法律学科的基本不熟悉导致历史学家低估了这些记录中发现的材料的历史价值。通过这样做,他们很可能丧失了对那些发生在一个特定案例之前、然后成功的事件的理解——这些事件可能对我们社会未来的发展方向产生影响。在我看来,更有可能的是,未能从历史的角度研究和分析法庭记录,是这些因素以及我没有提到的其他因素的结合。然而,不管原因是什么,即使是对早期法庭档案的一次匆忙而简短的浏览,现在也向我们揭示了我们今天面临的问题在许多情况下是在过去几年产生的,而引起这些问题的事件,如果加以研究和理解,可能有助于解决我们目前面临的20世纪的问题。的确,我们不应感到意外
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Court Records: History in the Making, Knowledge for the Taking
IT H A S only been of recent date that organizations such as the Historical Society of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and the Historical Society of the Third Circuit have come into being, in order to fill a void in sore need of being filled. This void may have occurred because, for reasons still unfathomed, historians by and large have traditionally ignored court records as a source of historical research. It may be that they have done so because, not having been trained primarily in the law, historians have not been attracted to, or may be unaware of, the rich historical lore that is buried in judicial records. O r , it may be because a basic lack of familiarity with the legal discipline has led historians to discount the historical value of materials found in these records. By doing so, they may very well have forfeited an understanding of those events which preceded, and then succeeded, a particular case decision—events that may have had an influence on the future directions that our society has taken. More likely, in my judgment, the failure to study and analyze court records from an historical perspective, stems from a combination of these factors, as well as others, to which I have not adverted. Whatever the reason, however, even a hurried and abbreviated journey through early court dockets reveals to us now that the problems facing us today have had in many instances their genesis in years past, and that the events g iv ing rise to those problems may, when examined and understood, possibly provide assistance in solving the 20th Century concerns presently confronting us. Indeed, it should come as no surprise to us that
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信