《联合国残疾人权利公约》和精神卫生法的未来

Peter Bartlett
{"title":"《联合国残疾人权利公约》和精神卫生法的未来","authors":"Peter Bartlett","doi":"10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) took effect on 3 May 2008. Here, I survey the content of the CRPD, noting that much of it will buttress existing policy initiatives. It places obligations on states (including the UK) to implement its provisions, which include standard human rights protection, rights to service provision particularly in the community, and protection from exploitation. Amendment of the Mental Health Act 1983 and Mental Capacity Act 2005 will be required to meet these standards. Although some of these changes are consistent with existing policy directions, others on their face provide a direct challenge to how we have thought about mental health law. In particular, the requirement that mental disability can never justify a deprivation of liberty (art 14) directly challenges how mental health law has been conceived in the UK. Compulsory treatment is also likely to be open to challenge, either in whole or in part. Mental health professionals must engage with these new ideas to re-formulate what mental health law is for.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88653,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","volume":"8 12","pages":"Pages 496-498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.012","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the future of mental health law\",\"authors\":\"Peter Bartlett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) took effect on 3 May 2008. Here, I survey the content of the CRPD, noting that much of it will buttress existing policy initiatives. It places obligations on states (including the UK) to implement its provisions, which include standard human rights protection, rights to service provision particularly in the community, and protection from exploitation. Amendment of the Mental Health Act 1983 and Mental Capacity Act 2005 will be required to meet these standards. Although some of these changes are consistent with existing policy directions, others on their face provide a direct challenge to how we have thought about mental health law. In particular, the requirement that mental disability can never justify a deprivation of liberty (art 14) directly challenges how mental health law has been conceived in the UK. Compulsory treatment is also likely to be open to challenge, either in whole or in part. Mental health professionals must engage with these new ideas to re-formulate what mental health law is for.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)\",\"volume\":\"8 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 496-498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.012\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476179309002146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476179309002146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

《联合国残疾人权利公约》于2008年5月3日生效。在此,我概述了《残疾人权利公约》的内容,并指出其中大部分内容将支持现有的政策举措。它规定各国(包括联合王国)有义务执行其条款,其中包括标准的人权保护,特别是在社区提供服务的权利,以及防止剥削。为了达到这些标准,必须修订1983年《精神卫生法》和2005年《精神能力法》。虽然其中一些变化与现有的政策方向一致,但从表面上看,其他变化对我们对精神卫生法的看法提出了直接挑战。特别是,精神残疾永远不能成为剥夺自由的理由的要求(第14条)直接挑战了联合王国对精神卫生法的构想。强制治疗也可能面临全部或部分挑战。精神卫生专业人员必须接受这些新想法,重新制定精神卫生法的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the future of mental health law

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) took effect on 3 May 2008. Here, I survey the content of the CRPD, noting that much of it will buttress existing policy initiatives. It places obligations on states (including the UK) to implement its provisions, which include standard human rights protection, rights to service provision particularly in the community, and protection from exploitation. Amendment of the Mental Health Act 1983 and Mental Capacity Act 2005 will be required to meet these standards. Although some of these changes are consistent with existing policy directions, others on their face provide a direct challenge to how we have thought about mental health law. In particular, the requirement that mental disability can never justify a deprivation of liberty (art 14) directly challenges how mental health law has been conceived in the UK. Compulsory treatment is also likely to be open to challenge, either in whole or in part. Mental health professionals must engage with these new ideas to re-formulate what mental health law is for.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信