{"title":"使用海绵的广义形态学","authors":"J. V. D. Gronde, J. Roerdink","doi":"10.1515/mathm-2016-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Mathematical morphology has traditionally been grounded in lattice theory. For non-scalar data lattices often prove too restrictive, however. In this paper we present a more general alternative, sponges, that still allows useful definitions of various properties and concepts from morphological theory. It turns out that some of the existing work on “pseudo-morphology” for non-scalar data can in fact be considered “proper” mathematical morphology in this new framework, while other work cannot, and that this correlates with how useful/intuitive some of the resulting operators are.","PeriodicalId":244328,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Morphology - Theory and Applications","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalized Morphology using Sponges\",\"authors\":\"J. V. D. Gronde, J. Roerdink\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/mathm-2016-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Mathematical morphology has traditionally been grounded in lattice theory. For non-scalar data lattices often prove too restrictive, however. In this paper we present a more general alternative, sponges, that still allows useful definitions of various properties and concepts from morphological theory. It turns out that some of the existing work on “pseudo-morphology” for non-scalar data can in fact be considered “proper” mathematical morphology in this new framework, while other work cannot, and that this correlates with how useful/intuitive some of the resulting operators are.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematical Morphology - Theory and Applications\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematical Morphology - Theory and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/mathm-2016-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Morphology - Theory and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mathm-2016-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Mathematical morphology has traditionally been grounded in lattice theory. For non-scalar data lattices often prove too restrictive, however. In this paper we present a more general alternative, sponges, that still allows useful definitions of various properties and concepts from morphological theory. It turns out that some of the existing work on “pseudo-morphology” for non-scalar data can in fact be considered “proper” mathematical morphology in this new framework, while other work cannot, and that this correlates with how useful/intuitive some of the resulting operators are.