基于各行业LDA主题模型的工作满意度因素比较分析——以Job Planet评论为例

Dong-Wook Kim, Juyoung Kang, J. Lim
{"title":"基于各行业LDA主题模型的工作满意度因素比较分析——以Job Planet评论为例","authors":"Dong-Wook Kim, Juyoung Kang, J. Lim","doi":"10.9716/KITS.2016.15.3.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Submitted:April 29, 2016 1 st Revision:July 22, 2016 Accepted:July 25, 2016 * 본 과제(결과물)는 교육부의 재원으로 지원을 받아 수행된 산학협력 선도대학(LINC) 육성사업의 연구결과입니다. ** 아주대학교 e-비즈니스학과, 학사과정 *** 아주대학교 e-비즈니스학과 교수, 교신저자 **** 아주대학교 e-비즈니스학과 부교수 As unemployment rates and concerns about turnover keep growing, the need for information is also increasing. In these situations, the job reviews which share information about the company catch people's attention because they are usually created by people who worked at the company. The development of SNS and mobile environments has led to an increase in the web services that provide job reviews. For example, Jobplanet is a job review service in Korea, and Glassdoor.com offers a similar service in the US. Despite this attention, however, research utilizing job reviews is insufficient. This paper asks whether there are differences in ratios of job satisfaction factors by industry, using LDA topic modeling and co-occurrence analysis to explore the differences. Through the results of LDA, we find that the ratios of job satisfaction factors are similar by industry. At the same time, the results of co-occurrence analysis show that the co-occurrence frequency of some job satisfaction factors appears high: pay and welfare, balance of work and life, company culture. We expect that the result of this research will be helpful in comparative analysis of job satisfaction factors by industry. Furthermore, in this paper we suggest how to use the job review data in organizational behavior research. Keyword:LDA Topic Modeling, Facet job satisfaction, Job Review, Co-occurrence Analysis 韓國IT서비스學會誌 第15卷 第3號 2016年 9月, pp.157-171 158 Dongwook Kim.Juyoung Kang.Jay Ick Lim","PeriodicalId":272384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korea society of IT services","volume":"245 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Job Satisfaction Factors, Using LDA Topic Modeling by Industries : The Case Study of Job Planet Reviews\",\"authors\":\"Dong-Wook Kim, Juyoung Kang, J. Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.9716/KITS.2016.15.3.157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Submitted:April 29, 2016 1 st Revision:July 22, 2016 Accepted:July 25, 2016 * 본 과제(결과물)는 교육부의 재원으로 지원을 받아 수행된 산학협력 선도대학(LINC) 육성사업의 연구결과입니다. ** 아주대학교 e-비즈니스학과, 학사과정 *** 아주대학교 e-비즈니스학과 교수, 교신저자 **** 아주대학교 e-비즈니스학과 부교수 As unemployment rates and concerns about turnover keep growing, the need for information is also increasing. In these situations, the job reviews which share information about the company catch people's attention because they are usually created by people who worked at the company. The development of SNS and mobile environments has led to an increase in the web services that provide job reviews. For example, Jobplanet is a job review service in Korea, and Glassdoor.com offers a similar service in the US. Despite this attention, however, research utilizing job reviews is insufficient. This paper asks whether there are differences in ratios of job satisfaction factors by industry, using LDA topic modeling and co-occurrence analysis to explore the differences. Through the results of LDA, we find that the ratios of job satisfaction factors are similar by industry. At the same time, the results of co-occurrence analysis show that the co-occurrence frequency of some job satisfaction factors appears high: pay and welfare, balance of work and life, company culture. We expect that the result of this research will be helpful in comparative analysis of job satisfaction factors by industry. Furthermore, in this paper we suggest how to use the job review data in organizational behavior research. Keyword:LDA Topic Modeling, Facet job satisfaction, Job Review, Co-occurrence Analysis 韓國IT서비스學會誌 第15卷 第3號 2016年 9月, pp.157-171 158 Dongwook Kim.Juyoung Kang.Jay Ick Lim\",\"PeriodicalId\":272384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korea society of IT services\",\"volume\":\"245 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korea society of IT services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2016.15.3.157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korea society of IT services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2016.15.3.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

提交:2016年4月29日,1 st修订:7月22日2016年接受:2016年7月25日*본과제(결과물)는교육부의재원으로지원을받아수행된산학협력선도대학(林肯)육성사업의연구결과입니다。* *아주대학교e -비즈니스학과,학사과정* * *아주대학교e -비즈니스학과교수,교신저자* * * *아주대학교e -비즈니스학과부교수失业率和担忧营业额持续增长,对信息的需求也在增加。在这种情况下,分享公司信息的工作回顾会引起人们的注意,因为它们通常是由在公司工作过的人写的。随着社交网络和移动环境的发展,提供工作评价的网络服务越来越多。例如,Jobplanet是韩国的一个工作评论服务,Glassdoor.com在美国提供类似的服务。然而,尽管如此,利用工作回顾的研究是不够的。本文探讨不同行业的工作满意度因素的比例是否存在差异,采用LDA主题建模和共现分析来探讨差异。通过LDA的结果,我们发现不同行业的工作满意度因子的比例是相似的。同时,共现分析结果显示,薪酬福利、工作与生活的平衡、企业文化等工作满意度因素的共现频率较高。期望本研究结果能对不同行业的工作满意度因素的比较分析有所帮助。此外,本文还提出了如何将工作回顾数据应用于组织行为学研究的建议。关键词:LDA主题建模,Facet工作满意度,工作回顾,共现分析。Juyoung康。林杰伦
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Job Satisfaction Factors, Using LDA Topic Modeling by Industries : The Case Study of Job Planet Reviews
Submitted:April 29, 2016 1 st Revision:July 22, 2016 Accepted:July 25, 2016 * 본 과제(결과물)는 교육부의 재원으로 지원을 받아 수행된 산학협력 선도대학(LINC) 육성사업의 연구결과입니다. ** 아주대학교 e-비즈니스학과, 학사과정 *** 아주대학교 e-비즈니스학과 교수, 교신저자 **** 아주대학교 e-비즈니스학과 부교수 As unemployment rates and concerns about turnover keep growing, the need for information is also increasing. In these situations, the job reviews which share information about the company catch people's attention because they are usually created by people who worked at the company. The development of SNS and mobile environments has led to an increase in the web services that provide job reviews. For example, Jobplanet is a job review service in Korea, and Glassdoor.com offers a similar service in the US. Despite this attention, however, research utilizing job reviews is insufficient. This paper asks whether there are differences in ratios of job satisfaction factors by industry, using LDA topic modeling and co-occurrence analysis to explore the differences. Through the results of LDA, we find that the ratios of job satisfaction factors are similar by industry. At the same time, the results of co-occurrence analysis show that the co-occurrence frequency of some job satisfaction factors appears high: pay and welfare, balance of work and life, company culture. We expect that the result of this research will be helpful in comparative analysis of job satisfaction factors by industry. Furthermore, in this paper we suggest how to use the job review data in organizational behavior research. Keyword:LDA Topic Modeling, Facet job satisfaction, Job Review, Co-occurrence Analysis 韓國IT서비스學會誌 第15卷 第3號 2016年 9月, pp.157-171 158 Dongwook Kim.Juyoung Kang.Jay Ick Lim
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信