{"title":"关于微分的进一步说明","authors":"E. Phillips","doi":"10.1017/S095018430000255X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"~{f (x).x}^-kf(x) when x>X, (7) ax then, as a little calculation shows, f(x)^Ax-~, (8) where A is a positive constant. No one would prefer (7) to (8) as a criterion of convergence and (8), like (6), is a well-known test for the convergence of infinite integrals. The next test, in the usual order, is given by taking <f>(x)=x log x in Theorems 1 and 2. That the test is useless may be seen from the fact (mildly interesting in its proof) that","PeriodicalId":417997,"journal":{"name":"Edinburgh Mathematical Notes","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A further note on differentials\",\"authors\":\"E. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S095018430000255X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"~{f (x).x}^-kf(x) when x>X, (7) ax then, as a little calculation shows, f(x)^Ax-~, (8) where A is a positive constant. No one would prefer (7) to (8) as a criterion of convergence and (8), like (6), is a well-known test for the convergence of infinite integrals. The next test, in the usual order, is given by taking <f>(x)=x log x in Theorems 1 and 2. That the test is useless may be seen from the fact (mildly interesting in its proof) that\",\"PeriodicalId\":417997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edinburgh Mathematical Notes\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edinburgh Mathematical Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S095018430000255X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edinburgh Mathematical Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S095018430000255X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
~{f (x).x}^-kf(x) when x>X, (7) ax then, as a little calculation shows, f(x)^Ax-~, (8) where A is a positive constant. No one would prefer (7) to (8) as a criterion of convergence and (8), like (6), is a well-known test for the convergence of infinite integrals. The next test, in the usual order, is given by taking (x)=x log x in Theorems 1 and 2. That the test is useless may be seen from the fact (mildly interesting in its proof) that