研究与实践图书馆员

R. G. Cheshier
{"title":"研究与实践图书馆员","authors":"R. G. Cheshier","doi":"10.2307/40322629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EARLIER in this program, H.C. Wright argued eloquently that librarians need to become more concerned with ideas than with things and that library researchers need to use more than the scientific method as they approach library problems. While librarians accept these ideas in principle, most practicing librarians would have problems in seeing the practical side of them. To quote Wright, \"The most brilliant failure of librarians to date is the inability to distinguish their substance from their instruments.\" But that may not be bad or even relevant. One is reminded of the question the information scientists used to ask librarians as the latter dealt with people: \"Did you give him the information he wanted or did you simply give him the item in which the information was contained?\" That was an infuriating question then and still is to librarians. Simply stated, librarians work with ideas as well as with things and deal with several professions which are increasingly unclear whether they are sciences, humanities, behavioral sciences, or some as yet undefined amalgam of these. Medicine and librarianship in particular are unclear, and since these are the professions with which many librarians spend most of their time, they, too, are unclear. The dilemma this creates is pervasive in the author's thinking of how we might reach some accommodation. Wright and this author are probably not as far apart as might appear, however, and the assignment here is to articulate a stance toward research","PeriodicalId":256869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education for librarianship","volume":"750 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research and the Practicing Librarian\",\"authors\":\"R. G. Cheshier\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40322629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"EARLIER in this program, H.C. Wright argued eloquently that librarians need to become more concerned with ideas than with things and that library researchers need to use more than the scientific method as they approach library problems. While librarians accept these ideas in principle, most practicing librarians would have problems in seeing the practical side of them. To quote Wright, \\\"The most brilliant failure of librarians to date is the inability to distinguish their substance from their instruments.\\\" But that may not be bad or even relevant. One is reminded of the question the information scientists used to ask librarians as the latter dealt with people: \\\"Did you give him the information he wanted or did you simply give him the item in which the information was contained?\\\" That was an infuriating question then and still is to librarians. Simply stated, librarians work with ideas as well as with things and deal with several professions which are increasingly unclear whether they are sciences, humanities, behavioral sciences, or some as yet undefined amalgam of these. Medicine and librarianship in particular are unclear, and since these are the professions with which many librarians spend most of their time, they, too, are unclear. The dilemma this creates is pervasive in the author's thinking of how we might reach some accommodation. Wright and this author are probably not as far apart as might appear, however, and the assignment here is to articulate a stance toward research\",\"PeriodicalId\":256869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of education for librarianship\",\"volume\":\"750 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of education for librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40322629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of education for librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40322629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本节目的早些时候,H.C.赖特雄辩地指出,图书馆员需要更多地关注思想而不是事物,图书馆研究人员在研究图书馆问题时需要使用比科学方法更多的方法。虽然图书馆员原则上接受这些想法,但大多数实际的图书馆员在看到它们的实际方面会有问题。引用赖特的话:“迄今为止,图书管理员最大的失败是无法区分他们的内容和工具。”但这可能并不坏,甚至也不相关。这让人想起了信息科学家在图书馆员与人打交道时经常问他们的问题:“你是给了他想要的信息,还是只是给了他包含信息的物品?”这在当时是一个令人恼火的问题,至今对图书馆员来说也是如此。简单地说,图书馆员不仅要处理事物,还要处理思想,而且要处理一些越来越不清楚的职业,这些职业是科学、人文科学、行为科学,还是这些职业的一些尚未定义的混合体。医学和图书馆员尤其不清楚,因为这些是许多图书馆员花费大部分时间从事的职业,所以它们也不清楚。在作者思考如何达成某种和解时,这种困境无处不在。然而,赖特和笔者的分歧可能并不像看起来那么大,这里的任务是阐明对研究的立场
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research and the Practicing Librarian
EARLIER in this program, H.C. Wright argued eloquently that librarians need to become more concerned with ideas than with things and that library researchers need to use more than the scientific method as they approach library problems. While librarians accept these ideas in principle, most practicing librarians would have problems in seeing the practical side of them. To quote Wright, "The most brilliant failure of librarians to date is the inability to distinguish their substance from their instruments." But that may not be bad or even relevant. One is reminded of the question the information scientists used to ask librarians as the latter dealt with people: "Did you give him the information he wanted or did you simply give him the item in which the information was contained?" That was an infuriating question then and still is to librarians. Simply stated, librarians work with ideas as well as with things and deal with several professions which are increasingly unclear whether they are sciences, humanities, behavioral sciences, or some as yet undefined amalgam of these. Medicine and librarianship in particular are unclear, and since these are the professions with which many librarians spend most of their time, they, too, are unclear. The dilemma this creates is pervasive in the author's thinking of how we might reach some accommodation. Wright and this author are probably not as far apart as might appear, however, and the assignment here is to articulate a stance toward research
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信