家务清洁作为工作与劳动的职业关系

L. Singha
{"title":"家务清洁作为工作与劳动的职业关系","authors":"L. Singha","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvkwnq9k.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter shows how cultural injustices obstruct service-providers’efforts to do cleaning as work. When the work is done as labour, therelationship is substantially unequal because of some combination of class,class–caste, gender and socioeconomic (and racial) disparities, and becausethe work done is considered low status. That is, both the work and workerare stigmatised. The worker often harbours ‘ressentiment’When cleaning is done as work, there will be a friendly work relationshipthat can be located within wider work relationships, but participatoryparity between the service-user and service-provider can be hampered byservice-users’ classed actions that inadvertently or intentionally retrenchhousework as low-value ‘women’s work’. For instance, feeling guilty aboutoutsourcing housecleaning or assuming that the service-provider needshelp in recognising their rights as workers. Such injustices as practisedin relation to commodified ‘women’s work’ in the home are part of thewider cultural injustices that pervade paid work more generally.","PeriodicalId":256435,"journal":{"name":"Work, Labour and Cleaning","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Occupational Relations of Domestic Cleaning as Work and Labour\",\"authors\":\"L. Singha\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvkwnq9k.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter shows how cultural injustices obstruct service-providers’efforts to do cleaning as work. When the work is done as labour, therelationship is substantially unequal because of some combination of class,class–caste, gender and socioeconomic (and racial) disparities, and becausethe work done is considered low status. That is, both the work and workerare stigmatised. The worker often harbours ‘ressentiment’When cleaning is done as work, there will be a friendly work relationshipthat can be located within wider work relationships, but participatoryparity between the service-user and service-provider can be hampered byservice-users’ classed actions that inadvertently or intentionally retrenchhousework as low-value ‘women’s work’. For instance, feeling guilty aboutoutsourcing housecleaning or assuming that the service-provider needshelp in recognising their rights as workers. Such injustices as practisedin relation to commodified ‘women’s work’ in the home are part of thewider cultural injustices that pervade paid work more generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Work, Labour and Cleaning\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Work, Labour and Cleaning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkwnq9k.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work, Labour and Cleaning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkwnq9k.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章展示了文化上的不公正是如何阻碍服务提供者把清洁工作当成工作来做的。当工作作为劳动完成时,由于阶级、阶级、性别和社会经济(和种族)差异的某种组合,并且由于所做的工作被认为是低地位的,这种关系实质上是不平等的。也就是说,工作和工人都被污名化了。当清洁工作被视为工作时,会有一种友好的工作关系,这种关系可以在更广泛的工作关系中找到,但服务用户和服务提供者之间的参与平等可能会受到阻碍,因为服务用户的分类行为无意或有意地将家务劳动贬低为低价值的“女性工作”。例如,对外包家政服务感到内疚,或者认为服务提供商在承认他们作为工人的权利方面需要帮助。这种与家庭中商品化的“妇女工作”有关的不公正是普遍存在于有偿工作中的更广泛的文化不公正的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Occupational Relations of Domestic Cleaning as Work and Labour
This chapter shows how cultural injustices obstruct service-providers’efforts to do cleaning as work. When the work is done as labour, therelationship is substantially unequal because of some combination of class,class–caste, gender and socioeconomic (and racial) disparities, and becausethe work done is considered low status. That is, both the work and workerare stigmatised. The worker often harbours ‘ressentiment’When cleaning is done as work, there will be a friendly work relationshipthat can be located within wider work relationships, but participatoryparity between the service-user and service-provider can be hampered byservice-users’ classed actions that inadvertently or intentionally retrenchhousework as low-value ‘women’s work’. For instance, feeling guilty aboutoutsourcing housecleaning or assuming that the service-provider needshelp in recognising their rights as workers. Such injustices as practisedin relation to commodified ‘women’s work’ in the home are part of thewider cultural injustices that pervade paid work more generally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信