基于机器学习的决策自动多类分类集成方法

Liming Fu, Peng Liang, Xueying Li, Chen Yang
{"title":"基于机器学习的决策自动多类分类集成方法","authors":"Liming Fu, Peng Liang, Xueying Li, Chen Yang","doi":"10.1145/3463274.3463325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stakeholders make various types of decisions with respect to requirements, design, management, and so on during the software development life cycle. Nevertheless, these decisions are typically not well documented and classified due to limited human resources, time, and budget. To this end, automatic approaches provide a promising way. In this paper, we aimed at automatically classifying decisions into five types to help stakeholders better document and understand decisions. First, we collected a dataset from the Hibernate developer mailing list. We then experimented and evaluated 270 configurations regarding feature selection, feature extraction techniques, and machine learning classifiers to seek the best configuration for classifying decisions. Especially, we applied an ensemble learning method and constructed ensemble classifiers to compare the performance between ensemble classifiers and base classifiers. Our experiment results show that (1) feature selection can decently improve the classification results; (2) ensemble classifiers can outperform base classifiers provided that ensemble classifiers are well constructed; (3) BoW + 50% features selected by feature selection with an ensemble classifier that combines Naïve Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) achieves the best classification result (with a weighted precision of 0.750, a weighted recall of 0.739, and a weighted F1-score of 0.727) among all the configurations. Our work can benefit various types of stakeholders in software development through providing an automatic approach for effectively classifying decisions into specific types that are relevant to their interests.","PeriodicalId":328024,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Machine Learning Based Ensemble Method for Automatic Multiclass Classification of Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Liming Fu, Peng Liang, Xueying Li, Chen Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3463274.3463325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stakeholders make various types of decisions with respect to requirements, design, management, and so on during the software development life cycle. Nevertheless, these decisions are typically not well documented and classified due to limited human resources, time, and budget. To this end, automatic approaches provide a promising way. In this paper, we aimed at automatically classifying decisions into five types to help stakeholders better document and understand decisions. First, we collected a dataset from the Hibernate developer mailing list. We then experimented and evaluated 270 configurations regarding feature selection, feature extraction techniques, and machine learning classifiers to seek the best configuration for classifying decisions. Especially, we applied an ensemble learning method and constructed ensemble classifiers to compare the performance between ensemble classifiers and base classifiers. Our experiment results show that (1) feature selection can decently improve the classification results; (2) ensemble classifiers can outperform base classifiers provided that ensemble classifiers are well constructed; (3) BoW + 50% features selected by feature selection with an ensemble classifier that combines Naïve Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) achieves the best classification result (with a weighted precision of 0.750, a weighted recall of 0.739, and a weighted F1-score of 0.727) among all the configurations. Our work can benefit various types of stakeholders in software development through providing an automatic approach for effectively classifying decisions into specific types that are relevant to their interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3463274.3463325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3463274.3463325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在软件开发生命周期中,涉众针对需求、设计、管理等做出各种类型的决策。然而,由于人力资源、时间和预算的限制,这些决策通常没有很好地记录和分类。为此,自动方法提供了一种很有前途的方法。在本文中,我们的目标是将决策自动分类为五种类型,以帮助涉众更好地记录和理解决策。首先,我们从Hibernate开发者邮件列表中收集了一个数据集。然后,我们实验并评估了270种关于特征选择、特征提取技术和机器学习分类器的配置,以寻求分类决策的最佳配置。特别地,我们应用了集成学习方法并构造了集成分类器来比较集成分类器和基分类器的性能。实验结果表明:(1)特征选择能较好地改善分类结果;(2)当集成分类器构造良好时,集成分类器优于基分类器;(3)结合Naïve贝叶斯(NB)、Logistic回归(LR)和支持向量机(SVM)的集成分类器,通过特征选择选择BoW + 50%的特征,在所有配置中分类效果最好(加权精度为0.750,加权召回率为0.739,加权f1分数为0.727)。我们的工作可以通过提供一种自动方法来有效地将决策分类为与他们的利益相关的特定类型,从而使软件开发中的各种类型的涉众受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Machine Learning Based Ensemble Method for Automatic Multiclass Classification of Decisions
Stakeholders make various types of decisions with respect to requirements, design, management, and so on during the software development life cycle. Nevertheless, these decisions are typically not well documented and classified due to limited human resources, time, and budget. To this end, automatic approaches provide a promising way. In this paper, we aimed at automatically classifying decisions into five types to help stakeholders better document and understand decisions. First, we collected a dataset from the Hibernate developer mailing list. We then experimented and evaluated 270 configurations regarding feature selection, feature extraction techniques, and machine learning classifiers to seek the best configuration for classifying decisions. Especially, we applied an ensemble learning method and constructed ensemble classifiers to compare the performance between ensemble classifiers and base classifiers. Our experiment results show that (1) feature selection can decently improve the classification results; (2) ensemble classifiers can outperform base classifiers provided that ensemble classifiers are well constructed; (3) BoW + 50% features selected by feature selection with an ensemble classifier that combines Naïve Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) achieves the best classification result (with a weighted precision of 0.750, a weighted recall of 0.739, and a weighted F1-score of 0.727) among all the configurations. Our work can benefit various types of stakeholders in software development through providing an automatic approach for effectively classifying decisions into specific types that are relevant to their interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信