议题抑制与美国政党制度危机:两党双头垄断的代价

John C. Berg
{"title":"议题抑制与美国政党制度危机:两党双头垄断的代价","authors":"John C. Berg","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2198572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paradoxically, the American party system is both highly polarized and unable to confront issues of vital importance. This paper examines the limitation of debate, and in some cases the complete absence of debate, on four major issues in the 2012 election: economic policy, climate change, international security, and -- paradoxically, given the strength of racial voting in that election -- race. The inability of the two-party system to provide choices on such issues is a serious restriction on popular sovereignty, and one indication that the system is in crisis. This revision of an earlier paper, which did not consider race as an issue, was presented at the 2013 annual conference of the New England Political Science Association, Portland ME, April 25-27, 2013.","PeriodicalId":196892,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Comparative Law & Analysis (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Issue Suppression and the Crisis of the American Party System: The Cost of Two-Party Duopoly\",\"authors\":\"John C. Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2198572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paradoxically, the American party system is both highly polarized and unable to confront issues of vital importance. This paper examines the limitation of debate, and in some cases the complete absence of debate, on four major issues in the 2012 election: economic policy, climate change, international security, and -- paradoxically, given the strength of racial voting in that election -- race. The inability of the two-party system to provide choices on such issues is a serious restriction on popular sovereignty, and one indication that the system is in crisis. This revision of an earlier paper, which did not consider race as an issue, was presented at the 2013 annual conference of the New England Political Science Association, Portland ME, April 25-27, 2013.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Comparative Law & Analysis (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Comparative Law & Analysis (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2198572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Comparative Law & Analysis (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2198572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

矛盾的是,美国的政党制度既高度两极化,又无法面对至关重要的问题。本文考察了2012年大选中辩论的局限性,以及在某些情况下完全没有辩论的四个主要问题:经济政策、气候变化、国际安全,以及种族——考虑到那次选举中种族投票的强度,这是自相矛盾的。两党制无法在这些问题上提供选择,这是对人民主权的严重限制,也是该制度陷入危机的一个迹象。在2013年4月25日至27日于缅因州波特兰举行的新英格兰政治科学协会2013年年会上,对之前一篇没有将种族问题考虑在内的论文进行了修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Issue Suppression and the Crisis of the American Party System: The Cost of Two-Party Duopoly
Paradoxically, the American party system is both highly polarized and unable to confront issues of vital importance. This paper examines the limitation of debate, and in some cases the complete absence of debate, on four major issues in the 2012 election: economic policy, climate change, international security, and -- paradoxically, given the strength of racial voting in that election -- race. The inability of the two-party system to provide choices on such issues is a serious restriction on popular sovereignty, and one indication that the system is in crisis. This revision of an earlier paper, which did not consider race as an issue, was presented at the 2013 annual conference of the New England Political Science Association, Portland ME, April 25-27, 2013.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信