洛克是有意识的基督

Philosophia Christi Pub Date : 2019-08-30 DOI:10.5840/PC20192118

Oliver D. Crisp

{"title":"洛克是有意识的基督","authors":"Oliver D. Crisp","doi":"10.5840/PC20192118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In several recent articles and a monograph, Andrew Loke has outlined a particular model of the Incarnation, which he calls the Divine Preconscious Model (DPM). In this article I provide a critique of this model, drawing on recent work by James Arcadi in order to show that there are serious theological costs involved in adopting the DPM.","PeriodicalId":434758,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia Christi","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loke’s Preconscious Christ\",\"authors\":\"Oliver D. Crisp\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/PC20192118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In several recent articles and a monograph, Andrew Loke has outlined a particular model of the Incarnation, which he calls the Divine Preconscious Model (DPM). In this article I provide a critique of this model, drawing on recent work by James Arcadi in order to show that there are serious theological costs involved in adopting the DPM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophia Christi\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophia Christi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/PC20192118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia Christi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/PC20192118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在最近的几篇文章和一本专著中，安德鲁·洛克概述了化身的一个特殊模型，他称之为神圣的前意识模型(DPM)。在这篇文章中，我对这种模式进行了批判，引用了James Arcadi最近的工作，以表明采用DPM涉及到严重的神学成本。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Loke’s Preconscious Christ

In several recent articles and a monograph, Andrew Loke has outlined a particular model of the Incarnation, which he calls the Divine Preconscious Model (DPM). In this article I provide a critique of this model, drawing on recent work by James Arcadi in order to show that there are serious theological costs involved in adopting the DPM.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Philosophia Christi

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量