{"title":"M&M 1963:另一种均衡","authors":"Alan L. Tucker, T. F. Sugrue, Kenneth J. Kopecky","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1803332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Invoking the same assumptions as Modigliani and Miller (1963), we demonstrate that their debt-only corner solution is not a unique equilibrium and furthermore that an alternative equilibrium exists in which capital structure is irrelevant for determining shareholder value. Our equilibrium follows from a simple and feasible arbitrage trading strategy and is sustainable in the sense that it is neither dominated by nor dominates the M&M solution in an inter-temporal setting. Our equilibrium has potentially significant implications for topics ranging from the under-leverage puzzle to the cost of capital to assessing fund performance, and beyond.","PeriodicalId":340291,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"M&M 1963: An Alternative Equilibrium\",\"authors\":\"Alan L. Tucker, T. F. Sugrue, Kenneth J. Kopecky\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1803332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Invoking the same assumptions as Modigliani and Miller (1963), we demonstrate that their debt-only corner solution is not a unique equilibrium and furthermore that an alternative equilibrium exists in which capital structure is irrelevant for determining shareholder value. Our equilibrium follows from a simple and feasible arbitrage trading strategy and is sustainable in the sense that it is neither dominated by nor dominates the M&M solution in an inter-temporal setting. Our equilibrium has potentially significant implications for topics ranging from the under-leverage puzzle to the cost of capital to assessing fund performance, and beyond.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1803332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1803332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Invoking the same assumptions as Modigliani and Miller (1963), we demonstrate that their debt-only corner solution is not a unique equilibrium and furthermore that an alternative equilibrium exists in which capital structure is irrelevant for determining shareholder value. Our equilibrium follows from a simple and feasible arbitrage trading strategy and is sustainable in the sense that it is neither dominated by nor dominates the M&M solution in an inter-temporal setting. Our equilibrium has potentially significant implications for topics ranging from the under-leverage puzzle to the cost of capital to assessing fund performance, and beyond.