Atharva Pansare, Prabhat Panwar, Pranali K. Kosamkar
{"title":"基于问卷回答的自然语言处理人格预测","authors":"Atharva Pansare, Prabhat Panwar, Pranali K. Kosamkar","doi":"10.1109/PuneCon55413.2022.10014939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the modern IT revolution is booming at a rapid growth speed, organizations and recruiters are finding it increasingly challenging to select the ideal applicant from a large number of applicants with diverse skill sets and personalities. Hence, selecting a candidate with a suitable personality for respective job profiles is a very important and great challenge for the HR department nowadays. Out of various personality prediction methods available out there, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator or MBTI is famous and accurate for our purpose of creating a personality prediction system for selecting candidates based on their personality. This study took into account all sixteen MB-Model coordinates. A comparative study of Random Forest, Logistic Regression, SVM, XGBoost has been done to perform personality prediction, and accuracy and confusion matrix for performance measurement of the models. While using TF-IDF, for the personality categories like Introversion/Extroversion the accuracy is 80.46%, for Sensing/Intuition it is 88.70%, for Thinking/Feeling it is 81.21% and for Perceiving vs Judging it is 72.97% with the Logistic Regression algorithm. Using Count vectorization for tokenizing, the accuracy is 80.97% for Introversion/Extroversion, for Sensing/Intuition it is 88.93%, for Thinking/Feeling it is 77.92% and for Perceiving vs Judging it is 73.48% with XGBoost algorithm, which gave the best performance.","PeriodicalId":258640,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality Prediction with Natural Language Processing using Questionnaire Responses\",\"authors\":\"Atharva Pansare, Prabhat Panwar, Pranali K. Kosamkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PuneCon55413.2022.10014939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the modern IT revolution is booming at a rapid growth speed, organizations and recruiters are finding it increasingly challenging to select the ideal applicant from a large number of applicants with diverse skill sets and personalities. Hence, selecting a candidate with a suitable personality for respective job profiles is a very important and great challenge for the HR department nowadays. Out of various personality prediction methods available out there, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator or MBTI is famous and accurate for our purpose of creating a personality prediction system for selecting candidates based on their personality. This study took into account all sixteen MB-Model coordinates. A comparative study of Random Forest, Logistic Regression, SVM, XGBoost has been done to perform personality prediction, and accuracy and confusion matrix for performance measurement of the models. While using TF-IDF, for the personality categories like Introversion/Extroversion the accuracy is 80.46%, for Sensing/Intuition it is 88.70%, for Thinking/Feeling it is 81.21% and for Perceiving vs Judging it is 72.97% with the Logistic Regression algorithm. Using Count vectorization for tokenizing, the accuracy is 80.97% for Introversion/Extroversion, for Sensing/Intuition it is 88.93%, for Thinking/Feeling it is 77.92% and for Perceiving vs Judging it is 73.48% with XGBoost algorithm, which gave the best performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PuneCon55413.2022.10014939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PuneCon55413.2022.10014939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Personality Prediction with Natural Language Processing using Questionnaire Responses
As the modern IT revolution is booming at a rapid growth speed, organizations and recruiters are finding it increasingly challenging to select the ideal applicant from a large number of applicants with diverse skill sets and personalities. Hence, selecting a candidate with a suitable personality for respective job profiles is a very important and great challenge for the HR department nowadays. Out of various personality prediction methods available out there, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator or MBTI is famous and accurate for our purpose of creating a personality prediction system for selecting candidates based on their personality. This study took into account all sixteen MB-Model coordinates. A comparative study of Random Forest, Logistic Regression, SVM, XGBoost has been done to perform personality prediction, and accuracy and confusion matrix for performance measurement of the models. While using TF-IDF, for the personality categories like Introversion/Extroversion the accuracy is 80.46%, for Sensing/Intuition it is 88.70%, for Thinking/Feeling it is 81.21% and for Perceiving vs Judging it is 72.97% with the Logistic Regression algorithm. Using Count vectorization for tokenizing, the accuracy is 80.97% for Introversion/Extroversion, for Sensing/Intuition it is 88.93%, for Thinking/Feeling it is 77.92% and for Perceiving vs Judging it is 73.48% with XGBoost algorithm, which gave the best performance.