作为剩余价值的投机

Andrea Eckersley, T. Bird
{"title":"作为剩余价值的投机","authors":"Andrea Eckersley, T. Bird","doi":"10.5334/MJFAR.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Speculation is an artist’s capital, enabling the emergence of the new. This is art’s capacity to bring about new frames of reference—new kinds of questions, experiences, events or encounters— to leverage difference in order to open onto an indeterminate future. As Elizabeth Grosz (2014: 123) notes, ‘(i)f art reads as other than an artistic expression, it is always about the summoning up of a new future, and as such it’s always a kind of political gesture’. Brian Massumi (2018: 25) regards this gesture as a means of reclaiming value from its reduction to the economic logic of the market, in order to emphasise the intensities of experiences that have value in and of themselves, such as the singular vivacity of an experience of colour. Excess is at the core of this theory of value, the unselected that forms the virtual background, a world of surplus. However, Massumi argues that capitalism produces an impoverished version of surplus value, dependent on a continual accumulation of increasing quantity to the detriment of the singular quality appearing as such. Artists’ social, affective and material speculations, their attempts to create something new, produce a processual surplus value as an affective excess that differs in kind from the surpluses of capital accumulation. We will argue that these speculative practices ought to be understood primarily in terms of an ethos actualised in an artist’s practice and not, as is so often the case, only in terms of the speculative financial returns the products of such practices may yield in the global art markets. The paper will explore the affective aspects of speculation through an investigation of the practice of Belgian artist Joelle Tuerlinckx. Her associative mode of working produces a web of processual thinking that forms connections as well as leaving loose ends open, often reactivating forgotten or abandoned objects, in a manner that produces a different order of value. Grosz, Elizabeth and Esther Wolfe (2014). ‘Bodies of Philosophy: An Interview with Elizabeth Grosz’, Stance 7, April, pp 115–126 Massumi, Brian (2017). ‘Virtual Ecology and the Question of Value’, in General Ecology: The New Ecological Paradigm, Erich Horl with James Burton (eds.), London: Bloomsbury, pp 345–373.","PeriodicalId":345481,"journal":{"name":"MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speculation as Surplus-Value\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Eckersley, T. Bird\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/MJFAR.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Speculation is an artist’s capital, enabling the emergence of the new. This is art’s capacity to bring about new frames of reference—new kinds of questions, experiences, events or encounters— to leverage difference in order to open onto an indeterminate future. As Elizabeth Grosz (2014: 123) notes, ‘(i)f art reads as other than an artistic expression, it is always about the summoning up of a new future, and as such it’s always a kind of political gesture’. Brian Massumi (2018: 25) regards this gesture as a means of reclaiming value from its reduction to the economic logic of the market, in order to emphasise the intensities of experiences that have value in and of themselves, such as the singular vivacity of an experience of colour. Excess is at the core of this theory of value, the unselected that forms the virtual background, a world of surplus. However, Massumi argues that capitalism produces an impoverished version of surplus value, dependent on a continual accumulation of increasing quantity to the detriment of the singular quality appearing as such. Artists’ social, affective and material speculations, their attempts to create something new, produce a processual surplus value as an affective excess that differs in kind from the surpluses of capital accumulation. We will argue that these speculative practices ought to be understood primarily in terms of an ethos actualised in an artist’s practice and not, as is so often the case, only in terms of the speculative financial returns the products of such practices may yield in the global art markets. The paper will explore the affective aspects of speculation through an investigation of the practice of Belgian artist Joelle Tuerlinckx. Her associative mode of working produces a web of processual thinking that forms connections as well as leaving loose ends open, often reactivating forgotten or abandoned objects, in a manner that produces a different order of value. Grosz, Elizabeth and Esther Wolfe (2014). ‘Bodies of Philosophy: An Interview with Elizabeth Grosz’, Stance 7, April, pp 115–126 Massumi, Brian (2017). ‘Virtual Ecology and the Question of Value’, in General Ecology: The New Ecological Paradigm, Erich Horl with James Burton (eds.), London: Bloomsbury, pp 345–373.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/MJFAR.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/MJFAR.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

投机是艺术家的资本,它使新事物得以出现。这是艺术带来新的参考框架的能力——新的问题、经验、事件或遭遇——利用差异来打开一个不确定的未来。正如Elizabeth Grosz(2014: 123)所指出的,“(i)如果艺术不是作为一种艺术表达来阅读,它总是关于召唤一个新的未来,因此它总是一种政治姿态”。Brian Massumi(2018: 25)认为这种姿态是一种从市场经济逻辑的减少中回收价值的手段,以强调具有自身价值的体验的强度,例如色彩体验的独特活力。过剩是这一价值理论的核心,未被选择的部分构成了虚拟的背景,一个过剩的世界。然而,Massumi认为,资本主义生产的是一种贫乏的剩余价值,依赖于不断增加的数量的积累,而损害了单一质量的出现。艺术家对社会、情感和物质的推测,他们对创造新事物的尝试,产生了一种过程剩余价值,作为一种情感过剩,它与资本积累的剩余在种类上有所不同。我们将认为,这些投机行为应该主要从艺术家实践中实现的精神气质来理解,而不是像通常情况那样,仅仅从这种做法的产品可能在全球艺术市场上产生的投机性金融回报来理解。本文将通过调查比利时艺术家Joelle Tuerlinckx的实践来探讨投机的情感方面。她的联想工作模式产生了一个过程思维的网络,形成了联系,也留下了松散的部分,经常以一种产生不同价值秩序的方式重新激活被遗忘或遗弃的对象。Grosz, Elizabeth和Esther Wolfe(2014)。“哲学的主体:对伊丽莎白·格罗兹的采访”,立场7,4月,第115-126页。“虚拟生态和价值问题”,在一般生态学:新生态范式,埃里希·霍尔与詹姆斯·伯顿(编),伦敦:布鲁姆斯伯里,345-373页。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speculation as Surplus-Value
Speculation is an artist’s capital, enabling the emergence of the new. This is art’s capacity to bring about new frames of reference—new kinds of questions, experiences, events or encounters— to leverage difference in order to open onto an indeterminate future. As Elizabeth Grosz (2014: 123) notes, ‘(i)f art reads as other than an artistic expression, it is always about the summoning up of a new future, and as such it’s always a kind of political gesture’. Brian Massumi (2018: 25) regards this gesture as a means of reclaiming value from its reduction to the economic logic of the market, in order to emphasise the intensities of experiences that have value in and of themselves, such as the singular vivacity of an experience of colour. Excess is at the core of this theory of value, the unselected that forms the virtual background, a world of surplus. However, Massumi argues that capitalism produces an impoverished version of surplus value, dependent on a continual accumulation of increasing quantity to the detriment of the singular quality appearing as such. Artists’ social, affective and material speculations, their attempts to create something new, produce a processual surplus value as an affective excess that differs in kind from the surpluses of capital accumulation. We will argue that these speculative practices ought to be understood primarily in terms of an ethos actualised in an artist’s practice and not, as is so often the case, only in terms of the speculative financial returns the products of such practices may yield in the global art markets. The paper will explore the affective aspects of speculation through an investigation of the practice of Belgian artist Joelle Tuerlinckx. Her associative mode of working produces a web of processual thinking that forms connections as well as leaving loose ends open, often reactivating forgotten or abandoned objects, in a manner that produces a different order of value. Grosz, Elizabeth and Esther Wolfe (2014). ‘Bodies of Philosophy: An Interview with Elizabeth Grosz’, Stance 7, April, pp 115–126 Massumi, Brian (2017). ‘Virtual Ecology and the Question of Value’, in General Ecology: The New Ecological Paradigm, Erich Horl with James Burton (eds.), London: Bloomsbury, pp 345–373.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信