扩展有界响应LTL的表达性

A. Cimatti, Luca Geatti, N. Gigante, A. Montanari, Stefano Tonetta
{"title":"扩展有界响应LTL的表达性","authors":"A. Cimatti, Luca Geatti, N. Gigante, A. Montanari, Stefano Tonetta","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.346.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extended Bounded Response LTL with Past (LTLEBR+P) is a safety fragment of Linear Temporal Logic with Past (LTL+P) that has been recently introduced in the context of reactive synthesis. The strength of LTLEBR+P is a fully symbolic compilation of formulas into symbolic deterministic automata. Its syntax is organized in four levels. The first three levels feature (a particular combination of) future temporal modalities, the last one admits only past temporal operators. At the base of such a structuring there are algorithmic motivations: each level corresponds to a step of the algorithm for the automaton construction. The complex syntax of LTLEBR+P made it difficult to precisely characterize its expressive power, and to compare it with other LTL+P safety fragments. In this paper, we first prove that LTLEBR+P is expressively complete with respect to the safety fragment of LTL+P, that is, any safety language definable in LTL+P can be formalized in LTLEBR+P, and vice versa. From this, it follows that LTLEBR+P and Safety-LTL are expressively equivalent. Then, we show that past modalities play an essential role in LTLEBR+P: we prove that the future fragment of LTLEBR+P is strictly less expressive than full LTLEBR+P.","PeriodicalId":104855,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expressiveness of Extended Bounded Response LTL\",\"authors\":\"A. Cimatti, Luca Geatti, N. Gigante, A. Montanari, Stefano Tonetta\",\"doi\":\"10.4204/EPTCS.346.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extended Bounded Response LTL with Past (LTLEBR+P) is a safety fragment of Linear Temporal Logic with Past (LTL+P) that has been recently introduced in the context of reactive synthesis. The strength of LTLEBR+P is a fully symbolic compilation of formulas into symbolic deterministic automata. Its syntax is organized in four levels. The first three levels feature (a particular combination of) future temporal modalities, the last one admits only past temporal operators. At the base of such a structuring there are algorithmic motivations: each level corresponds to a step of the algorithm for the automaton construction. The complex syntax of LTLEBR+P made it difficult to precisely characterize its expressive power, and to compare it with other LTL+P safety fragments. In this paper, we first prove that LTLEBR+P is expressively complete with respect to the safety fragment of LTL+P, that is, any safety language definable in LTL+P can be formalized in LTLEBR+P, and vice versa. From this, it follows that LTLEBR+P and Safety-LTL are expressively equivalent. Then, we show that past modalities play an essential role in LTLEBR+P: we prove that the future fragment of LTLEBR+P is strictly less expressive than full LTLEBR+P.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.346.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.346.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

LTLEBR+P (Extended Bounded Response LTL with Past, LTLEBR+P)是近年来在反应性合成中引入的线性时间逻辑(Linear Temporal Logic with Past, LTL+P)的一个安全片段。LTLEBR+P的优点是将公式完全符号地编译为符号确定性自动机。它的语法分为四个层次。前三个层次的特征是(特定的组合)未来的时间模式,最后一个层次只承认过去的时间操作符。在这种结构的基础上存在算法动机:每个级别对应于自动机构造的算法的一个步骤。LTLEBR+P复杂的语法使得很难精确地描述其表达能力,也很难将其与其他LTL+P安全片段进行比较。本文首先证明了LTLEBR+P对于LTL+P的安全片段是表达完备的,即在LTL+P中可定义的任何安全语言都可以在LTLEBR+P中形式化,反之亦然。由此可见,LTLEBR+P与Safety-LTL在表达上是等价的。然后,我们证明了过去模式在LTLEBR+P中起着至关重要的作用:我们证明了LTLEBR+P的未来片段严格低于完整的LTLEBR+P。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expressiveness of Extended Bounded Response LTL
Extended Bounded Response LTL with Past (LTLEBR+P) is a safety fragment of Linear Temporal Logic with Past (LTL+P) that has been recently introduced in the context of reactive synthesis. The strength of LTLEBR+P is a fully symbolic compilation of formulas into symbolic deterministic automata. Its syntax is organized in four levels. The first three levels feature (a particular combination of) future temporal modalities, the last one admits only past temporal operators. At the base of such a structuring there are algorithmic motivations: each level corresponds to a step of the algorithm for the automaton construction. The complex syntax of LTLEBR+P made it difficult to precisely characterize its expressive power, and to compare it with other LTL+P safety fragments. In this paper, we first prove that LTLEBR+P is expressively complete with respect to the safety fragment of LTL+P, that is, any safety language definable in LTL+P can be formalized in LTLEBR+P, and vice versa. From this, it follows that LTLEBR+P and Safety-LTL are expressively equivalent. Then, we show that past modalities play an essential role in LTLEBR+P: we prove that the future fragment of LTLEBR+P is strictly less expressive than full LTLEBR+P.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信